Jump to content

Jonahtron

Member
  • Posts

    111
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jonahtron

  1. I want a revamp to the summoning pools. Units like Rebecca, Genny and Saber shouldn’t be 5 Star. Heck, you should be able to get them at 3 star, but the 3 star pool literally hasn’t changed at all since release. I also really think healers should just get their own color. They could be like, yellow or something. It just sucks trying to get a Klein to feed to my Reinhardt and instead I get another Wrys. However they probably won’t do any of that. I do hope to see some cool new banners. I couldn’t help but notice that this Feh channel comes out just before warriors’ free update, so their might be something to that. That would be a pretty awful banner though, considering all 3 of warriors’ original characters are generic sword users, so hopefully their’s nothing to that. I’d like some more fe6 or fe7 characters, since we haven’t gotten any for a while. Despite being in the game at launch, fe6 has less characters in the game than fe15 now, so a banner with like, Perceval or Echidna would be cool. Or we could get a dawn brigade banner, I guess. I would be very excited for an fe5 banner, but given all the attention genealogy just got, I doubt they’ll be revisiting Judgral any time soon. Leif will probably be the last lord added to heroes. Unless you count radiant dawn Ike, who could be added as a separate character, given his vastly different design. Aside from all that, I guess they’ll probably announce some grand hero battle or tempest trial. I don’t really have anything specific in mind. Probably something correlating with whatever banner they announce. Pie in the sky, I want a Gharnef grand hero battle, but I don’t expect one.
  2. I wasn’t really asking for evidence. That isn’t really possible at the moment. Someone would loose their job for that. I’m just saying that it seems highly unlikely, partly because a lot of these mechanics sound pretty bad, like the 30% avoid and the skirmishing you’re other party.
  3. Yes it would mean she’s a troll. If this is fake, than she clearly just wants attention. Why else would she post more info the day mangs a video on the leak? She wouldn’t be trying to start a conversation.
  4. I’m not trying to solve anything by saying I think it’s fake. What would I be trying to solve anyways? I’m simply starting my opinion. I think this is fake and mis leaker is a troll. I’d be happy to be proven wrong, but that’s not really possible at the moment.
  5. I started writing that before you made your post here, so I didn’t know you’d see it, but even still, I just don’t believe you. This whole leak just seems highly unlikely the more I think about it. Why would some girl in new Zeland know this information? How did you convinently get more information the day mangs made a video about your leaks? 30% avoid is just way to high a bonus. I can’t imagine the game would feel very fair at that point. It also seems unlikely that you could just fight your other party and it not being some plot important event. The whole thing sounds iffy. To top things off, why should I even believe you’re the real leaker? You just as easily could be a troll. If you were an employee of Nintendo who just leaked a game, it would seem like a bad idea to put yourself out there this much. You could be fired. Of course you could also not work at Nintendo, I guess. What do I know?
  6. Yeah the whole skirmishing against your own party thing seems super unlikely. That, plus the fact that I highly doubt anyone privy to this information would be familiar with mangs, makes me doubt the legitimacy of this post. Also the whole + 30% avoid seems far to extreme. This is fake. Calling it now.
  7. If I had Katarina, I’d back her. Unfortunately, the only one I have trained up is Amelia. I actually have all the guys, but they’re all level one. So I’m either going to train up my -speed Ryoma, or just back Amelia. Or maybe I’ll back Katarina anyways, since she will probably get knocked out round one anyways.
  8. 5. Kirby 4. Super Smash bros 3. Mario 2.Fire Emblem 1. Zelda Honerable mention goes to Shantae, In case you don’t count smash Bros as a series.
  9. I like him better than Lianna. He’s basically just a generic shonen protagonist, but at least he has a lot more personality than Lianna, who’s your basic kind caring person, something that’s much less fun to watch. I’d actually put him above Roy since he at least has a personality.
  10. So the official dlc announcement said that each pack would feature 3 history mode maps, focused on the new characters, so we can assume that each dlc character will get a map focused on them. I'm guessing that means that they'll either be maps where we fight or are joined by the dlc characters, or where the dlc characters are the main characters (the sprite you control on the map). my ideas for the maps are: Niles: Birthright chapter 18. They could do conquest chapter 8, but I feel like it's much more likely that they'll do a map where you fight Niles. If they wanted to do a map where you control Niles, it would have to be something largely original. Maybe that could be based off chapter 8? Oboro: Conquest chapter 10/chapter 23. One's more infamous, while the other is more plot important. Like with Niles, they'd have to do something more original if they wanted a map where you control Oboro, maybe they could base it off birthright chapter 9? Azura: They could do the theater in Nestra, but given that the other 2 characters will probably have maps based off the other 2 routs, Azura's map will likely be a revelations map, probably the final/ 2nd to last chapter. Navarre: Shadow dragon chapter 3 is a likely guess. New Mystery chapter 7 could also be neat, though then they would maybe have to make a Phina portrait or something, so that could cause issues, but it'd be a pretty easy map to make Navarre controllable in. Minerva: Shadow dragon chapter 10 would be a safe bet, but what would be really cool is if the map was based off Minerva's Archanea saga map. Linde: Shadow dragon chapter 11 could work I guess, but if they wanted to do a map where you control Linde, then they could do the 2nd to last map from New Mystery, and have Linde face off against Gharnef, since he killed her dad and all. Owain: Most likely just Owain's paralogue, though they could do his map from the future past, though that map would be weird without Inigo. Tharja: chapter 9 I guess. I couldn't really see them changing any other chapter to make Tharja more significant, unless they just want to somehow put Awakening's final chapter in. Olivia: Could be chapter 10 or 11. Again, I can't really see them making Olivia important anywhere else, or really at all. They could maybe do something original about her meeting up with Chrom's party. So those are my predictions, what are yours? Unlike most people who are whining about us having to pay for the npc characters, I'm actually looking forward to the dlc, so I like speculation like this.
  11. So the official dlc announcement said that each pack would feature 3 history mode maps, focused on the new characters, so we can assume that each dlc character will get a map focused on them. I'm guessing that means that they'll either be maps where we fight or are joined by the dlc characters, or where the dlc characters are the main characters (the sprite you control on the map). my ideas for the maps are: Niles: Birthright chapter 18. They could do conquest chapter 8, but I feel like it's much more likely that they'll do a map where you fight Niles. If they wanted to do a map where you control Niles, it would have to be something largely original. Maybe that could be based off chapter 8? Oboro: Conquest chapter 10/chapter 23. One's more infamous, while the other is more plot important. Like with Niles, they'd have to do something more original if they wanted a map where you control Oboro, maybe they could base it off birthright chapter 9? Azura: They could do the theater in Nestra, but given that the other 2 characters will probably have maps based off the other 2 routs, Azura's map will likely be a revelations map, probably the final/ 2nd to last chapter. Navarre: Shadow dragon chapter 3 is a likely guess. New Mystery chapter 7 could also be neat, though then they would maybe have to make a Phina portrait or something, so that could cause issues, but it'd be a pretty easy map to make Navarre controllable in. Minerva: Shadow dragon chapter 10 would be a safe bet, but what would be really cool is if the map was based off Minerva's Archanea saga map. Linde: Shadow dragon chapter 11 could work I guess, but if they wanted to do a map where you control Linde, then they could do the 2nd to last map from New Mystery, and have Linde face off against Gharnef, since he killed her dad and all. Owain: Most likely just Owain's paralogue, though they could do his map from the future past, though that map would be weird without Inigo. Tharja: chapter 9 I guess. I couldn't really see them changing any other chapter to make Tharja more significant, unless they just want to somehow put Awakening's final chapter in. Olivia: Could be chapter 10 or 11. Again, I can't really see them making Olivia important anywhere else, or really at all. They could maybe do something original about her meeting up with Chrom's party. So those are my predictions, what are yours? Unlike most people who are whining about us having to pay for the npc characters, I'm actually looking forward to the dlc, so I like speculation like this.
  12. I mean, to be fair, expecting 13 dlc characters was a little optimistic. It’s a somewhat scummy strategy, but one I fully expected. I doubt the characters were fully done in the base game though.
  13. Every playable mage is supposed to be an anima mage. Granted, most of there attacks are generic magic, but I specifically recall seeing Robin having a Thoron looking attack.
  14. Really the only character missing from Hyrule warriors was Groose. That was honestly a crime. But other than that, the game was significantly less dividing than this game. Sheik got in, Midna got in, Girahim got in, the fans were happy. As for my dlc predictions, I just think that it's a little suspicious that they haven't said so by now, like how it was suspicious that it took them so long to mention shadow dragon characters. Like, don't you think it would have been a good idea to mention in this interview? Like, just say "There will be 3 new characters in each pack, but we'll also release Owain, Oboro etc. in an update for free!" That would have just made people more excited and therefore, more people would want to buy the game. It's a win win situation! But there silence is concerning.
  15. I don't know why so many people keep predicting a maid or Ninja. They're not going to add a new weapon type. There's like, zero chance of that happening. They would then have to add a bunch of new weapons to the game and probably a generic enemy to the game to use them. That's a lot of new models to make for some realativly cheep dlc. I guess Kaze could get in using swords and he could use shurikens on the side, but I doubt Kaze is high on their priority list.
  16. I think people are being a bit optimistic here. I feel like if we're getting the npc characters, than they'll be part of this dlc, not a free update. So I'm thinking we'll be getting: Fates: Azura, Oboro, Niles Awakening: Owain, Tharja, Gaius/Severa Shadow Dragon: Navarre, Minerva, Camus/Hardin People are saying that they're not going to make us pay for characters already in the game, but I wouldn't put it past them. I doubt the Villains will ever be playable though. The only one I want to play as is Gharnef anyways.
  17. Yes. In fe1, Anna asked if you wanted to save your data for you after each map, so if this is the case, that's a pretty cool reference.
  18. I'm kinda getting an Eliwood vibe from the left figure. It probably isn't, but it kinda looks like him.
  19. It probably does though. I could still see villains being playable and not on the box, but that's about it. We know this is all the fates playable fates protagonists, as Azura is confirmed not in the game. Why would they show all the characters for one game and not the others? Doesn't make a whole lot of since, does it? Especially since 25 is already a ton of characters. I highly doubt they'll be more.
  20. He isn't on the box with all the other characters. That's the argument.
  21. I am almost positive that he won't end up being playable in the game. He's likely just an NPC or something.
  22. I didn't end up complaining about clones because the developers seems to run on Melee logic, in that they want more characters rather than more variety. I'm kinda ok with this, so I won't bother complaining about it too much.
  23. Ok, my rebuttal to your points: I didn't mention archers and mages because there's a weapon triangle, which is kinda a poorly implemented mechanic if most the cast uses swords. I never waned the cast to be all the main characters. I was even ok with them only focusing on the 3 games, I just think they did it poorly. I specifically mentioned Corrin, because I hate Corrin. I do think Including Lyn and Celica's a problem too, but Lyn looks really fun, so I didn't say anything there. We do? Because I don't. I realize that, it's just that magic is kid of her main thing, and it would have lessened the number of sword users. I'm just really salty about too many swords, ok? The story could have been about the villains invading Archenea or Ylisse, or whatever, and the protagonists of that world chase after them and end up in other fire emblem worlds. Why couldn't that work? Ok, maybe "add something new" wasn't the best wording, but what I mean is that fates already has a majority of the cast, why not add characters from literally anything else? I do want to make clear that I am still getting this game, as it looks really fun, and it's not like I hate all the characters. I just think this games choice of characters is just stupid.
  24. For starter: There's 3 lance users (All of which are fliers with the same moveset), 3 axe users and 11 sword users. They claim to be focusing on 3 games to limit the amount of sword users, yet sword users make up nearly half the cast. They claim to focus on Awakening, fates and shadow dragon, but they completely shaft shadow dragon in favor of having 2 Corrins. Because that's what the people want. I actually don't mind them focusing on 3 games. It makes since, given that trying to represent the whole series would be impossible, It's just that almost the whole cast is from Awakening and fates.. Why do Rowan and Lianna use swords? Why does Celica use a Sword? Nobody cares even a little bit about Rowan and Lianna, so why not just cut them and put effort into characters people actually want? And finally, why is the first dlc pack adding in more fates characters? There's already 10 of them, add something new! Rally the main issue is fates. It has too many main characters, so it ends up taking to much room. If it didn't exist, we could of gotten more shadow dragon, and maybe fe7 characters. Also fates contributes four sword users. so that matters, I guess. I don't know. I just wanted to vent. I'm just mad about Jagen and Minerva not getting in the game.
  25. It said new mystery, specifically? Well, I hope that means Katarina or Athena(though maybe not Athena because, you know swords)
×
×
  • Create New...