Jump to content

samthedigital

Member
  • Content Count

    242
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Favorite Fire Emblem Game
    Binding Blade

Allegiance

  • I fight for...
    -

Recent Profile Visitors

818 profile views
  1. If we use the strictest definition of the word useful then this is true, but it's also true of every other game in the series. It's similar if we take a loose interpretation of the word.
  2. Beruka can fly, so she doesn't need inflated stats to be useful. If many people forget her it's because they're trying to compare her directly to Camilla which is a mistake. You can still use Camilla and dump experience on other units. It might not be possible to milk all of the experience in a map that way, but it's not necessary to do that even if you want a full team. Anyway, this reads as personal grievances that you have with the game rather than any real issue that the game might have. I'll use this as an example. You think that it's a bad idea for units to have specialized roles. I would personally use FE7 and FE8 as examples of poor unit design because every unit has effectively the same role. They all want to be able to fight as many enemies as possible at 1-2 range. The units that do it better are generall the ones that have more movement.
  3. I'm not sure if this was mentioned previously, but it's important to be careful in chapter 8. It's possible to give Lyn extra experience by viewing the cutscene with the ballista multiple times, so Lyn could potentally level when she shouldn't. There are several other issues with the rng and emulators that could cause issues, but I am not the most knowledgable on this. I also haven't followed this guide. I found out about the ballista experience thing the hard way.
  4. This is the one thing I don't agree with from your post. Big maps aren't a problem in a vacuum to be sure, but the size of the maps in FE4 do exacerbate other flaws that the game already has.
  5. I have seen the word tedious used a few times, and I would use that word along with monotonous to describe the beginning of a hard mode difficulty in most cases instead of challenging. I don't find the predominant strategy of dogpiling on a small amount of enemy units to be very compelling, so I would rather enemy stats be toned down.
  6. Without LHM he is absolutely up there even if he's not in the running for the best unit. Some of the units mentioned are not in the running either; Priscilla, Pent, and Hector were mentioned, and they are much closer to Heath than to Marcus (not Hector, but you get the idea). As for your two criticisms of Heath... He definitely isn't going to compare to LHM Florina, but Florina struggles outside of a utility roll without it. Fiora needs something like 10 levels and a promotion just to match his starting bulk, and once he starts doubling his combat is better anyway. His join time is also actually fairly convenient since it's right before a desert map and a few defend maps if you're looking to feed him some levels.
  7. If you're really having troubles a Pure Water and a little time on Crazed Beast nets him a decent amount of kills. Alternatively Axereavers work on the left side of the map; there are a lot of easy options there. Heath is really good in general too. I'd give him a little less credit with LHM, but it's hard to go wrong with his physical bulk compared to the other fliers.
  8. I'm a little surprised that no one has mentioned Heath yet.
  9. In my opinion you have never beaten any Fire Emblem games because you don't like the concept of ironman runs.
  10. Backpacks are not a waste of a unit slot if that's what you're trying to imply. Having one unit perform 'well' is better than having two units performing 'alright' if the difference is being able to perform on enemy phase. It was difficult to get a good quote for the last part because your sentence went on for a lot longer than it should have. In any case, growths do matter, but everything else matters too. A unit with a poor start due to bad bases has to make up for this somehow to become a good unit. Jill isn't a perfect example, but she'll do in this instance. She does not start with great bases compared to some units, but investing in her pays off in a big way. She can solo a handful of chapters (3-6, 3-12, and she can do a lot of work in some of the endgame chapters) where no other unit can. It's just that often units with really poor bases are not as lucky as Jill. In Fates there aren't any units that have awful bases that clear chapters much more efficiently than units with good bases do. It doesn't help that those units generally have growths that help them keep up for the entire game too. I've talked about this before, but why does it matter if Kaze does something worse than another unit? I've explained it before, but maybe an example could work. Suppose we got another unit almost exactly like Camilla (we're going to assume that they join at the same time too) except their defense was one point higher at base. Would you then put Camilla 2 tiers below because there's another unit that's strictly better than her?
  11. The best dancer is usually the least useful unit otherwise by process of elimination, so it is only true to an extent. It also means that Caspar is not a bad choice as a dancer even if it applies to everyone.
  12. Alternatively he's a good option if you don't have any other units that you want to 'relegate' to the dancer role. I think that Caspar can be a decent fit in an in-house only run as an example; I don't use my dancer for much besides dancing anyway.
  13. You're under the assumption that my argument is predicated on numbers showing that Jakob is a lot better than another unit, so you're still missing the point. I don't think that I ever directly compared Jakob to anyone else; you're the one who cares about that. If Jakob functions as a good unit early on in the game without having to spend too much time training him then he should be credited for that. It doesn't matter if Silas can perform the same role or that Camilla might do a specific job much better as long as Jakob can do something well. The important thing to take away from my message is to evaluate Jakob for what he is capable of doing. It doesn't matter at what point in the game it is, and it's not as if Jakob is completely useless later on in the game. This is simply not true. You might find that the game gets progressively more difficult or something like that, but that's because of the self-imposed restrictions you place on yourself. I generally find that Fire Emblem tends to get easier as I get more tools to complete the game. More specifically in the case of Conquest though most chapters later on in the game can be cheesed without much effort.
  14. Refer to the last thing I said in my last post as it applies here too. You're either ignoring what I said earlier or missing the point. It does not matter if Jakob is useless later on in the game, so it would be disingenuous to compare his performance to other units then. If you want to discredit his early game contributions you would have to establish that using him is detrimental in the long term. I know that you're trying to be pedantic, but it doesn't actually matter if I add that line to either one of my sentences.
  15. In some maps dismounting and taking damage from terrain probably also works if you really need to hit 1HP.
×
×
  • Create New...