I don't typically mind religion/science arguments, and I don't mind people arguing for their religion with at least proper etiquette and some semblance of support, but this guy has got me beat. If you're trolling, and I don't think you are, you've won.
How can you simply "disagree" with something? It's been proven, through the Miller-Urey Experiment, that amino acids can be created through conditions that would have been present on the early earth. Organic compounds CAN be created from nonorganic ones. Even if you only examine that singular fact, and you agree with microevolution, the rest should at least be more than unacceptable?
Theories, such as the Big Bang and evolution, are not random guesses that should be believed or ignored without a second thought. Lots of work has been put in to proving the validity of these theories, and as they are realistically unchallenged in terms of accuracy, they are currently accepted. If, somehow, God appeared in Times Square tomorrow and proved his dominance and superiority, I'm sure views would change. The problem with religion is that there IS no accepted grey area. The BIble is somehow the literal word of God, mistranslated and miscopied over thousands of years, and it's still completely true? Anybody accepting that has a lot less behind them than any scientist or their supporters.