[About Randolph in Azure Moon]

25 minutes ago, omegaxis1 said:

No, I did. I gave one example of Dimitri confessing that he killed children. He used Fleche, who isn't even someone Dimitri killed, as an example. So no, that's not even one example. I did give scenarios, because the point is that Dimitri doesn't look under nuances and deeper reasons. If he views someone in a negative way in his boar state, he kills, simple as that. 

Also, he states this confession not in the support, but in the story. If anything, trying to insist that he's justified in his admission of killing kids just too much.

I kinda get you're missing the point of what I said. First of all, the orphans I used as examples are mentioned in his supports. His C and A support to be exact.

After re-reading these however, it turns out he merely captured the children. Which does mean he must have killed at least one child off-screen, but we have no way of knowing whether they were "innocent" or hostile. Considering the context however - the full blown war with children losing loved ones left and right - it is more likely he was attacked by children.

At least only one child, you may ask? Yes, as not having directly killed Fleche himself does not mean Dimitri can not feel responsible for her death. As the support proves, he could have easily disarmed Fleche, stopped her in some way, and prevented Rodrigue and Fleche from dying. 

Oh, and thinking about it... didn't Edelgard try to assassinate her fellow students multiple times? Before the war? You know, when they were under 18? "Children", one might say.

2 hours ago, omegaxis1 said:

Dimitri literally has only himself to blame for Edelgard invading Faerghus. Because there is 100% no proof in CF that Edelgard would have even tried to invade Faerghus had Dimitri not allied with Rhea. Because contrary to what you're thinking, Edelgard isn't like she is in the other routes during CF, since even she states in her B support that without Byleth's support, she'd have lost her way.

Which kinda brings me back to this. Edelgard was aware of who Dimitri was: her childhood friend/step-sibling. And I don't remember Dimitri allying with Rhea before the war, huh, weird. And you are telling me she only invaded Faerghus because he allied with Rhea? Why try to assassinate him then?

 

But heavens, this thread is hardly about Randolph and Fleche anymore and is devolving into a Dimitri bad/Edelgard bad thread once more. I think imma stop bothering with this, maybe we can pick this up in a more appropriate thread, hm.

[About Randolph in Azure Moon]

58 minutes ago, omegaxis1 said:

You are literally only going about Fleche as the ONLY example, one that Dimitri didn't kill. But he did very much admitted that he killed KIDS. And you're assuming trying to insist that every kid that Dimitri killed simply has to be just like Fleche. Am I correct in this? 

Well, even one example is more than you gave, to be quite honest. You merely created some highly theoretical scenarios of little, innocent boys, killing to survive, to get some bread and such.

As Axel987 mentioned, the only other concrete proof of Dimitri killing children, besides Fleche, is his own support line. You know, those orphans who attacked him, with obvious lethal intent; circling back to Dimitri not having killed any non-combatants. Merely those showing clear hostility towards him, in a time of war.

Fleche and those orphans are already enough children to be counted as "children". Dimitri saying he killed "Adults and children." doesn't mean he slaughtered millions of them. Pretty sure he would already feel bad enough about killing those few, hostile children.

1 hour ago, omegaxis1 said:

Because contrary to what you're thinking, Edelgard isn't like she is in the other routes during CF, since even she states in her B support that without Byleth's support, she'd have lost her way.

And yet you say Dimitri is "way more of a hypocrite", "he's in for revenge" and criticize him for not seeing "himself in the wrong". In a route that is not his own. A route without Byleth as Dimitri's support. Doesn't he state multiple times, in AM that is, that he wouldn't know what he would have done without the professor?  Like, literally the same reason you defend Edelgard for her actions in the other routes?

[Petition to claim parity between homosexual options in FE:TH]

2 minutes ago, Rezzy said:

  Hide contents

Then why are they even S supports and not just A?

 

Spoiler

Well, to be fair, you do marry! Not them, not anyone you've ever seen and will see, not even a man, but you marry someone! :)

 

Edit: Not to start any conspiracy theories or anything, but I assume to make it look like there is more than just one gay option.

 

[Budding talent progression]

14 minutes ago, Tribute said:

Not 12 activity points.

Three, assuming you go into it with a full morale bar.

Byleth can only train their budding talent via teachers, not via weekly instructions. Hence one needs to spend a total of 12 activity points.

Mind you, activity points and not instruction/teaching points.

[Petition to claim parity between homosexual options in FE:TH]

Fun fact (and spoiler I assume):

Spoiler

Alois' and Gilbert's S-supports are platonic and Byleth ends up marrying a random villager GIRL when the game ends. Hence we actually only have one gay option: Linhardt. At least he isn't a sadist, yay?