Mukmuk

Just to clarify, Seth actually has better all-around growths than all of the cavaliers you get in the game. If this isn't a troll I don't know what this is. Joshua is sword-locked in an enemy-phase game. He's certainly no Rutger because the passive CRIT is lowered. Fun fact: he'll only have on average around 13 strength at a Lvl 20 myrmidon. Obviously you got very lucky with your Joshua. Tana is technically a better unit statistically than Vanessa, it's just her weak join time and Vanessa's easy availability and level lead that puts her over Tana. It's not like even in the endgame Vanessa's much worse than Tana statistically, you'll most likely be using both anyways. It's not about enjoyment of the game, Moulder is just strictly better than Natasha. He gets a level lead and that's the deciding factor between the two. I would agree with you that Natasha is underrated, but tier lists can't be made off personal experience.

Ironman, Hard/Lunatic Mode, No Death, full recruitment runs are #1!!! No, of course not. You're mostly right. However, keeping everyone alive gives an added challenge, sometimes fun, sometimes torturous, to the game. I wouldn't necessarily say for me this mind set works. Every time I lose a unit and reason is telling me "let it slide!", I just can't. I reset because I like my Fire Emblem games macho. I remember my first Ironman run of Binding Blade (much like Mangs is doing at the time of this post), as few deaths as possible. I only lost 3 units, but some of them were my more useful units. I lost Dieck (ugh), Sue (Sue's ok.), and PERCEVAL (UGHHHH). Probably most people would agree that only 3 units dying in an ironman run is pretty good (Mangs lost like 30lol and counting), but not for me. During the entire run, I was thinking, "aw, shit! Perceval could have done that! Man, if only Dieck was here, he could have helped a lot!" The run wasn't half as fun with those thoughts plaguing me. Oh well, even if the 'non-restrictive' FE playstyle isn't for me, I can always laugh at bald Norwegian dudes failing horribly...

A lot of people are saying Apotheosis, but I don’t really think it’s the most difficult. I can easily beat it without rallies, Limit Break (I never bothered to spend money on other DLC), whatever. But that’s unimportant, at least to you. Honestly, if you want to beat the game properly, just don’t buy DLC at all. Relying on Infinite Regalia or the EXP map (along with others) to buff your units is an utter joke and a waste of your time.

Ian Sinclair killed the voice acting of Berkut. SoV in general, as most people would agree. I don’t know. I’m going to have to go with popular opinion here and say Mia from RD. I mean...it’s just awful.

Blazing Blade- Old Hubba *Turns out to be Dark Druid* Uh oh. In all seriousness, Pent in Binding Blade, probably.

Yeah, Fire Emblem maker would be awesome. Hell, fans can come together and create entire games, not just levels. That would be cool. The Last Promise was decent, but with Fire Emblem Maker there's so much more potential.

Looks like I need to see a doctor lol. Oops.

Well... I still think you should be ok???? Even if they are gone. There is a reserrection shrine somewhere I believe. Oh yeah. Yeah, that. Well, you can just revive them, then. I don't know if that shrine has 1 charge or more. If you honestly can't beat the level, then... DUNGEON TIME!!! Ok, no. Keep us updated- I'm still not clear on what you actually need help on- Jamil, how to get past the witches, Also, if I'm recalling correctly, it is completely unreasonable to have a level 13 Dread Fighter Saber at that point without grinding.

Isadora, maybe. But she’s not the terrible unit you make her out to be, like Life said above. Lucius is bad? Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! (I’m tempted to put in more “Ha”s but I won’t). Now that’s just bullshit. Who else are you going to promote except for Lucius that’s not Pricilla? Erk or Canas over Lucius? You’ve got to kidding me. Also you clearly didn’t take into account availability but ok...

To be fair, it’s actually not that easy to get a direct answer for these kind if questions on Google. But yeah. And now to yip9: Does it even fucking matter? Who cares?

Why are you playing a different Fire Emblem game in the middle of a play through anyways? What’s the point? Anyways, apart from whatever I already mentioned, glad you’re enjoying FE7. You’ll like FE6 and FE8 as well. A word has to go in especially for FE8. FE8 is the best GBA game, but don’t listen to me because I’m biased.

Both of you are right, that wasn’t a well thought out comment. I wouldn’t be surprised either. Anyways, it’s gonna be hard to make FE4 for a new generation. It was hard waiting for foot units to catch up while Sigurd killed everything. Just saying.

I think that Canto is fine as it is (just no FE4 canto, please). Canto makes sense for horse units- attack and retreat. The main problem is fixing mounted units in general. Dismount sounds like a good idea (I’ve heard that Thracia had this mechanism). Or, give everyone canto or remove canto entirely. Obviously this doesn’t even scratch the surface but this is just from the top of my head. I’ll think of more stuff later.

I think most people on the fandom have been waiting for a middle east aesthetic for quite a while now. All Nintendo needs to do is not make it too stereotypical/ racist and it’ll be ok. Of course, that speaks for itself.

But she needs (or needed) help on Duma’s Gate, not the swamp, so mentioning Jedah is rather useless. She’ll find out next level anyway. Anyways, she can just bait the mages in with Saber and send the pegasus knights in. No archer needed.

Yep, I will. Gotta pause from my Three Houses grind craze and enjoy some good ol' fashioned FE... Project Exile is pretty incredible. No visible grammar mistakes so far!lol

Kamui's absence is pretty disturbing, yeah. I say that Leon's overrated but that's me. I'm kind of confused why you would use Valbar though. Oh well, whatever works. Jedah? Where the hell did Jedah come from? For Duma's Gate that's Jamil. Saber can take care of him.

Ha ha ha! I have more hours! Ha ha halol Yeah, I would have to agree with all of that. Flayn, not so much. I would also count some of Dimitri's and Shamir's supports as among my favorites. Obviously there's a lot more to be said, but those are off the top of my head.

*searches up Project Exile. AHHHHHHH!!! *Looks at when Project Exile hit the forums (May 31, 2019) Fuckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk why didnt I learn of this sooner how did this escape my attention Mr. / Mrs. Fire Brand, you have saved my life. I am forever indebted to you. I will sacrifice my children to you. In all seriousness, thanks so much. You have no idea how much I appreciate you right nowlol.

Gah! More Fates Ok, in all seriousness: Conquest is vastly superior to both Birthright and Revelations. After playing Conquest, do not, I repeat, DO NOT, waste your time with Birthright or Revelations. It's not worth it. Birthright is way, way too easy (Ryoma) and has an awful story, Revelations has a good first half and then turns into a big, steaming pile of shit in the second half. Even though Conquest suffers from bad writing and an awful story, there are some notable upsides. The tactics are devillish, the maps are great, and the gameplay is great. However, it is unfathomable (to me) how people could have enjoyed Conquest, unless you completely ignore the story. Welp, that's just me.

Oh yeah... that. I completely forgot about that. Yeah, I know what you mean. Oh well, stuff like this is why I hate staffbots in general...

Jeez, chill. I didn't bite your head off. Yes, newer fans (also people like me) want remakes of older games. I only said I don't think it'll happen the next game. Maybe next next.

Oh the tier list. Right. I didn't even look at the bottom half of that comment. You didn't need to clarify anything, my bad. Yeah, Knoll probably doesn't deserve D. It's just that I have a deep animosity toward staffbots. The guaranteed EZ way to beat Vigarde is to have Knoll (or Ewan, if you must...) spam phantoms until the spear breaks. I have never done that. Ever. In my many many runs of SS. I'll clear it up later. You're still right about the rules.

To be fair to all the people asking for FE4 remakes and the like (although I would prefer Thracia first because I never got to play an English version of it-or at best a poorly translated one that made life hell), it (in my humble opinion), is probably not going to happen in the next FE. Video game producers want to follow up on the heels of a successful video game with more fresh concepts and such that make the game more and more interesting, and then when interest has died down a little bit, they can consider doing something else. Just look at Awakening. After that, the producers went into a 3 year long think and came out with Fates, a jumbo-pack of...ideas! to say the least. Obviously the developers were on LSD or something, because they came out with Fates. But, they tried. Oh well. Anyways, following on the massive success of Three Houses, I don't think Nintendo and Intelligent Systems will pull back so quickly. The newer fans are hungry for more material, and they will not be denied their feast. Of course, a new game will also be devoured by older FE fans, so it is probably in Nintendo's best interests to release new games, not remakes. It's a win-win. Of course, this is all my opinion, and I am totally expecting someone to pull a Ben Shapiro on me, but ah well.

What kind of Fire Emblem do you think Nintendo and Intelligent Systems should release next? Just curious about the opinions here. Personally, I want the next up-and-coming Fire Emblem to follow on the heels of Three Houses, with fresh ideas, design and the like, but that's just me.