Just finished my 2nd playthrough in general and 1st HM playthrough of FE7. So I have a question, why Eliwood is so hated? Don't get me wrong, guy is worse than than Hector and a bunch of cast, but he is not bad, at least at HM. Yeah, he have poor bases, not enough good Rapier, ok for this game standarts growths and late promotion, but on top of that he have some qualities.
First off his promotion. Yeah it's late, but it's a good one. His promo gives him a horse and access to javelins and lances(which are way better than swords). His promo bonuses are also good, giving him access to more enemies, who he can double. His damage output is also good and on that point of the game he becomes good and goes on par with other Paladins(don't kill me for that sentence).
The fact that no one besides Marcus and sometimes Hector cannot kill properly. So in order to get exp you most of the time would damage an enemy with one unit and then kill with another. If keep that in balance beetween units all of your units including Eliwood get enough exp to get a several levels, so it's easy time for him to level up(looks like a Leif FE5 situation).
His utility in the game after promotion is very good, he literally becomes a Paladin without axes to access(sorry). And that already pulls him above a bunch of scrub like Lyn or Bartre(or name another meme characters). And at that point he even become better than Hector because Spd and horse.
Mention that I did not slow myself down in order to get exp for Eliwood, heck I even gave Marcus almost solo some chapters. So I want to you to correct me, because it's looks like something wrong with me that I found Eliwood not a bad lord. How does it changed in HHM? What was your expirience with Eliwood?