-
Posts
71 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by PyroPlazma
-
Wouldn't mind seeing other characters getting some more spotlight. But binding blade is also over-saturated with characters so that's a bit tricky. Would like the FE8 style convoy with it being tied to lords, but I also understand that's kinda busted. My only issue with the FE7 model is flanking reinforcements can screw Merlinus.
-
She's certainly a better sword lord than Roy/Eliwood!
-
Why is Grado an "Empire"?
PyroPlazma replied to Alastor15243's topic in Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones
I was going to say something similar, but you beat me to the punch lol. -
I agree with what he said.
-
Well said
-
Grammar mistake that was meant to say "Post FE8"
-
Moulder va Natasha Comparison
PyroPlazma replied to Whisky's topic in Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones
You forgot Moulders mustache -
They never returned
-
Well since FE8 I believe they've more less used or been depicted using axes. Besides the whole point of that was Pegasus=Lance, Wyvern=Axe, Griffon=Sword so weapon triangle is represented in fliers.
-
Griffon Riders: Essentially just an in between of Wyvern Riders and Pegasus Riders, wield swords to complete the trinity.
-
In which FE game were armor knights at their most useful?
PyroPlazma replied to Mjolnir's topic in General Fire Emblem
I honestly don't remember, it's been over 2 years since I played the game lol. -
In which FE game were armor knights at their most useful?
PyroPlazma replied to Mjolnir's topic in General Fire Emblem
Not counting great knights... Shadows of Valentia, that's about it.... Fire Emblems are design from the player perspective is antithetical to how armor knights work. -
What is your unpopular Fire Emblem opinion?
PyroPlazma replied to BlackSymphony's topic in General Fire Emblem
1. Generals should trade some attack for very high resistance. Killing should be akin to killing Dragons in Binding Blade, Besides magic (already dealt with) You'd need to use armor effective weapons. They should also get full weapon triangle plus bows. 2. Characters should either wear aesthetic clothing designed to show off their features or wear practical looking armor. I hate the halfway approach (you know who I'm talking too) 3. Sacred Stones is the best of the GBA era -
USA Gun Rights/Gun Control Discussion Thread
PyroPlazma replied to Jason-SilverStarApple's topic in Serious Discussion
Most of the current threads pertaining to fire emblem I find to be of little interest. Why can't I argue in a thread made for arguing then post in other threads when something gets my interest? Not to mention I took up a pro gun stance and have been fighting off 3v1 until recently when you showed up. Arguing 3 separate within the same thread is rather consuming to say the least. -
USA Gun Rights/Gun Control Discussion Thread
PyroPlazma replied to Jason-SilverStarApple's topic in Serious Discussion
I think your implication was rather simple Why is my posting history relevant? I have vested interest in this subject because I watched and studied it personally for years (since like 2013 IIRC). Not to mention most FIre Emblem are about tier list and PME 0% stuff I couldn't care less about. No I don't remember or know about "the last guy" are to fill me in? I don't see how I'm doing anything wrong besides disagreeing with you considering I just re-read the code of conduct again. Unless dissenting opinions against moderators is a rule now? You still didn't reply to my previous statement. -
USA Gun Rights/Gun Control Discussion Thread
PyroPlazma replied to Jason-SilverStarApple's topic in Serious Discussion
She's using the common fallacious reasoning in opposition to a armed population being that unless the people collectively together rise up and roflstomp pro government forces in a immediate open battle then the entire effort is pointless. It's a False Dilemma fallacy. They say the same thing about Germany disarming the Jews in preparation for the holocaust. The implication being unless they literally defeated the entire Wehrmacht then all would be pointless. Never mind the fact it's harder to shove people into trucks/trains to death camps when they're armed and no they otherwise have nothing to lose. Not to mention the Syrian civil war is alot more complicated than she likely believes. It hasn't been a complete and total roflstomp of the rebels either... -
USA Gun Rights/Gun Control Discussion Thread
PyroPlazma replied to Jason-SilverStarApple's topic in Serious Discussion
Are you just going to sit there and pretend you didn't just say.... You yourself have provided zero links or data on your own while you condescendingly dismiss me then act as though I'm going the "emotional route" When I send some of that condescension back your way? Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame of me. So this line of argument started out with I replied with TO which you responded with This is the point where I failed to initially catch what was going on. So we've gone from: 1. The POTUS will protect gun 2. This was proven to be demonstrably false 3. Then you pivoted to "Well this technically doesn't outright ban/confiscate guns so....." 4. Pointed out that sufficient draconian legislation can in effect ban something, see automatic weapons in America 5. Now we've arrived at "well why should we have automatic weapons?" You just keep pivoting/moving the goal post to something easier (in your mind) to defend. -
USA Gun Rights/Gun Control Discussion Thread
PyroPlazma replied to Jason-SilverStarApple's topic in Serious Discussion
10 U.S. Code § 246.Militia: composition and classes U.S. Code Notes prev | next (a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard. (b)The classes of the militia are—(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and (2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia. Also Relevant 1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53. (https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html) Guaranteeing a individuals right to bear arms was literally whole point of the DV v Heller case, read it again. 1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53. Militias are not enacting "vigilante justice" They're protecting the state from external threats of internal tyranny. Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494, 71 S. Ct. 857, 95 L. Ed. 1137 (1951), "[W]hatever theoretical merit there may be to the argument that there is a 'right' to rebellion against dictatorial governments is without force where the existing structure of the government provides for peaceful and orderly change." -
USA Gun Rights/Gun Control Discussion Thread
PyroPlazma replied to Jason-SilverStarApple's topic in Serious Discussion
The act literally defines official and non official militias. Militias normally by definition don't directly fall under government supervision unless federalized. The intention of the 1903 was to clearly establish the difference between regular civilian militias and the National Guard. Hence forth and to this day National Guardsmen attend Basic training with active duty/reservist and wear US Army uniforms (I was the Army for 3 years and can also speak with personal experience on this one). Well regulated back when the constitution was written DID NOT MEAN GOVERNMENT REGULATION! It simply means in good/working order. Yeah provided that person 1. Doesn't understand the constitution was written over 200 years people talked differently (see well-regulated) 2. Doesn't understand militia=regular citizens, both literally and legally. 3. Second amendment=A well armed citizenry being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and use weapons shall not infringed. Second somendment in a nutshell using modern vernacular. Nothing loose or broad about it, just read it several times to yourself. Then put yourself in the shoes of the founding fathers writing it. Specifically in regards to them having just fought a violent revolution to earn their independence. Said war was kicked off when the tyrannical government tried to disarm them (Take a wild guess why they'd do that). -
USA Gun Rights/Gun Control Discussion Thread
PyroPlazma replied to Jason-SilverStarApple's topic in Serious Discussion
Of course the website would take a massive dump forcing me to re-type this... If you can't understand how certain extensive regulation on the functions of firearms can indirectly ban them, then I can't be bothered with the rest of your arguments. See I can be condescending as well. FYI The reason why bump stocks exist is due to the NFA and 1984 act which effectively bans automatic weapons for 95% of the population without stating it outright. Barring production while requiring extensive licensing and tax stamps makes owning automatic weapons prohibitively expensive and time consuming which in turn is why many say automatic weapons are effectively banned. Bump stocks were made to subvert this fact. So remind me again how statements are "fear-mongering" when they are back by real world politicians saying these very things and in many pushing said legislation? Who are vastly unqualified due to possessing zero knowledge in the function and operation of firearms Militia act of 1903 defines unofficial militia as an able bodied man aged 17-45 You'll find "well regulated" doesn't mean what you seem to think it does. . 1. A win is a win regardless 2. Me quoting DC v Heller was more to do with the pointing out the fact that individual citizens do have a constitutional right to own firearms and that it is not some privilege bestowed upon by the state or tied exclusively to militia service. 3. Can you please link me these criticism of Judge Scalia in regards to this case Mind linking me? Can you please link the proper studies that state that gun control=less gun homicide? I have never asserted this. -
USA Gun Rights/Gun Control Discussion Thread
PyroPlazma replied to Jason-SilverStarApple's topic in Serious Discussion
when I say update I mean updating the wording to account for modern day vernacular and advances in technology not necessarily in theory changing whats within the amendment itself. I.E. updating the first amendment to include the internet