Blacken

Congratulations. You've outed yourself as the failure-fearing child I've said you were throughout this thread.You need to apologize and right your fuckup, right now. Because now people who thought that BK was being stupid? Now they think differently. You fucked up.

See, there's the thing. I admit I have faults. I revel in having faults. That's what makes me a goddamn human. I'm also not a person put in a role of authority. I'm not good at those roles. I actively avoid them because I'm not good at them. And I actively work to address my own failings, and minimize my exposure to roles in which those failings will cause significant problems (as opposed to roles where I can comfortably exercise what skills I have in those areas, and improve them).These are not habits of yours. They need to be if you're going to do well. And running from your mistakes is not a good way to do that.

Victoly? She's not. I'm scared. :(

"Stop sucking and actually make the place worth the FESS members that we suggested go here, with our word that it wouldn't suck, and we'll rein in point-and-laughing at stupid people."Compromises are fun.

Semantic equivalence. If you are talking about shit you don't know anything about, you are a fucking nitwit. Because when you walk away, others are misinformed. Monkey see, monkey do.And I don't fucking like dodgers. You don't get to be wrong and keep talking without being introduced to the Backhand Of Correctness. You getting butthurt is not my problem. If I'm right, I'm right. That I'm very pointed about being right does not change a thing, and claims to the contrary are laughable.And you might notice that I don't get pointy when it's not something that any remotely educated human being should already know. If I'm getting annoyed, it's because you didn't do your homework. And, yes, being educated is a prerequisite to actually having a discussion: tardhopping around without a shred of a clue does not a discussion make. If you don't want the MEAN OL' BWAAAACKEN to give you a rhetorical thump upside the head, and you know that he does so when you are grossly uninformed about something basic...welp, I think you can put two and two together. He's too busy feeling persecuted to even talk, let alone compromise.

That would be unethical.

Go back to that man of an e-girlfriend and let the adults talk.

Really? I'm not on an unmetered bandwidth Internet connection. His ads do cost me money.Even if that weren't the case, that doesn't change that, yes, a financial transaction is going on with me (and you, and everyone else) as the commodity being traded. Whether or not any of the money is coming out of my pocket is irrelevant--the ad provider is essentially paying for me to visit his site. I am a party to the transaction (whether against my will or not). And in any case, the moment you open the doors to a community site is the moment you are no longer sole owner. Thanks for playing.

You need fewer witty comments and more competent administration, the ability to admit when you have a problem, and the ability to actually conduct rational discussion rather than hide.

Since I'm not adblocking his ads, yes, I very much am. He is selling my eyes--exposure of the advertisements to me--to his advertisers.

When you run a community site (especially one where you're taking money for it--those ads aren't magical zero-revenue ads, you know), you are the agent of the community.

He can answer why he's continually and constantly fucking up, why he's incapable of admitting when he's wrong, why he's tra-la-fucking-la'ing around posts with meaningful content and responding to retard one-liners from mouthbreathers like Lyle, and then I'll consider it.

When have you ever cared about getting anything useful, Josh?That's a serious question, because frankly it seems like your entire interest is in looking strong to the memberbase. Which, to be honest, you're pretty bad at, because you clearly don't understand people and don't understand how very transparent and pathetic it looks. I don't think you're capable of taking anything useful even when it's offered. You don't take responsibility (I had to fucking nail you to the wall to get you to admit you could have done better regarding losing three months of your site's data, let alone to get you to take responsibility for it!), you don't bother to address problems when they're brought up to you. You would desperately like to surround yourself with more idiots and yes-men, because they don't challenge you, they don't expect you to man up and do something rather than sit around with your thumb up your ass. Instead all you do is shoot the messenger. You respond to stupid little tardcomments right in this thread rather than dare risking the idea that somebody might be right--that somebody might be saying something that would mean you're wrong and mean you have to do something to fix it! Do you think that's good management? Do you think that's ethical? Do you think that's smart? I presume you don't, so why the fuck do you do it? Chris thinks you're doing it because your back's against the wall, and I don't disagree. Maybe because that's the only way to do anything when it comes to a potato like you. Maybe because you're the sort of person who refuses to actually do anything until you have no choice in the matter, no matter how evident it is that you're fucking up.

#theashtray Kratos|AFK H ~chatzilla@sa-90704220.client.mchsi.com :1 New Now Know How#theashtray Blacken Hr~ ~ed@sa-3F8E9AC5.maine.res.rr.com :0 Ed #theashtray PossibleBit Hr ~PossibleB@D97E8109.E33B8274.CB65EB2E.IP :0 PossibleBit #theashtray Bobo Hr ~Bobo@sa-37C13C64.dyn.optonline.net :0 That's for me to know.... #theashtray HUGE_WALRUS Hr@ ~Bob@sa-B7A53378.hsd1.mi.comcast.net :0 Steven #theashtray Mow_Mow Hr% ~mowmow@sa-92C54CAA.socal.res.rr.com :1 Mow Yun #theashtray Raven Hr+ ~lordikey@sa-8A4FBFD.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net :0 Muhed #theashtray Fox Hr& ~butterbui@sa-EE801EC6.hsd1.nh.comcast.net :0 Cedric Bogardus #theashtray [old_sage] H& ~owl_watch@sa-95D1BFC2.dllstx.fios.verizon.net :0 z #theashtray Paradox Hr@ ~clockwork@sa-6E51CDF6.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com :0 Luis #theashtray End of /WHO list. Looks fine to me. (The forum petered out because frankly there's only so many times you can go "I like boobs." "Yup." and keep it novel.)

don't worry he has backups!

Add &t=XmYs to the URL. Because knowing is half the battle.

Jesus fuck, he said he'd fixed that already.FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

And Josh hides another thread of discussion because it makes him look bad. I guess I have my answer, huh? Fuck doing the right thing, it's allllllll about you, Joshypoo.

Mmm. Paranoia is delicious.

No.

Untrue. Catholic doctrine defines humans as having within them the light of God. This does not mean they are not animals, it means that they have a higher status than the animals--the creatures without said light of God. In other words, there are Animals--those that would be today defined within the kingdom Animalia--and there are animals. Bzzt, no. At least not without a lot of qualifications, footnotes, and "but ignore this that destroys my claim".Subhumans like you make atheists like me look bad.

I don't think even you know how much I love that picture.