Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'necroposting'.
Found 1 result
-
The SF Code of Conduct states that: I'd like to discuss the merits of such a rule. What are the specific benefits of having an explicit rule for this? At the very least, look at this post: http://serenesforest.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=46060&p=3301367 ; I believe this to be an acceptable post, as it answers (and provides more information) to an unresolved problem. In general, I believe that necroposting rules bring very specific cons: - Inability to add on new documentation to an old problem/request. - Creation of many threads asking the same question/making only small incremental steps to one end. - Discouraging continued discussion on a topic (one must agree that creating a new a thread is a much larger barrier to posting than simply replying). Next, allow me to give a few examples of "necroposts" that undeniably helped the community in question and were on topic. FE8 Native Instrument Map Danger Zones In sum, I'd like to propose the following point: A post should be acceptable as long as it is on topic and contributes to the topic of the thread. (and, of course, following all other regulations). At the very least, there should be an exception to documentation-based threads, commonly found in Fan Projects, that would be more general than the stated "You have a bug report or constructive advice for a fangame." However, I firmly believe that any post that is productive and contributes to a topic should never be discouraged.
