Interceptor Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 Rule #54 of Fire Emblem: don't try to make sense of effective bonuses or the Weapon Triangle. Down that road lies madness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liz Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 Then why were they vulnerable to bows in previous games? you ask too many irrelevant questions. it's a game mechanic. game mechanics are changed. quite often, may i add. logically, Wyverns shouldn't be weak to arrows, since they're scales protect them. they just added that to make them less hax, since they already are good melee units and have excellent range and all that. they had to make them less hax, which is why they probably made them weak against bows. either that, or they just made everyone who could fly weak to bows to avoid the hassle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bros Posted July 1, 2009 Author Share Posted July 1, 2009 you ask too many irrelevant questions.it's a game mechanic. game mechanics are changed. quite often, may i add. logically, Wyverns shouldn't be weak to arrows, since they're scales protect them. they just added that to make them less hax, since they already are good melee units and have excellent range and all that. they had to make them less hax, which is why they probably made them weak against bows. either that, or they just made everyone who could fly weak to bows to avoid the hassle. Last possibly irrelevent question. Why is Myrth vulnerable to bows? Shes a Dragon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dondon151 Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 Rule #54 of Fire Emblem: don't try to make sense of effective bonuses or the Weapon Triangle. Down that road lies madness. FE6 tried to in a support conversation, but it didn't make sense at all >.> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bros Posted July 1, 2009 Author Share Posted July 1, 2009 FE6 tried to in a support conversation, but it didn't make sense at all >.> Which one? I'd like to read it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dondon151 Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 LancexLot: http://serenesforest.net/fe6/support/020.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alacalibur Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 LancexLot: http://serenesforest.net/fe6/support/020.html Chess on the battlefield FTW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanarkin Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 lmao all physical attacks are effective against Rafiel -__- even those that target resistance. Danm those with long range they doubled! (4-e-1) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grandjackal Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 Is Raphael weak to bows? Dammit, he's weak to everything! Sex appeal alone kept him in an empty desert over the course of years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanarkin Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 Is Raphael weak to bows?Dammit, he's weak to everything! Sex appeal alone kept him in an empty desert over the course of years. he is weak to everything. Ike can't talk too loud or he'll break Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bros Posted July 3, 2009 Author Share Posted July 3, 2009 I meant to bows do Bonus Damage to him. Not if it's a danger to him because everything is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knife Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 I meant to bows do Bonus Damage to him. Not if it's a danger to him because everything is. No bonus damage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.