Jump to content

Quickhammer Mafia - Game Over


SB.
 Share

Recommended Posts

Because "Shitty Filler Mafia" probably isn't allowed.

Co-hosted by Boron.

Rules:
0. As the host, I have the right to edit these rules at any time. If this happens, you will be informed.
1. The game is NOC, meaning you don't talk about the game outside of this game thread while it is ongoing.
2. This game is anonymous, and it's supposed to stay that way. Do NOT reveal your identity while you are playing the game.
3. If you're dead, don't talk to anyone who doesn't have access to the graveyard quicktopic. You can ask to be informed, but please don't spoil the rest of the graveyard.
4. Screenshotting and quoting any information given by the host outside of the thread well result in a modkill.
5. Editing posts is banned, although depending on the severity of the edit punishment may be more lax.
6. Should you be modkilled through any fault of your own, you automatically lose. Tactical modkills are even lamer and will be dealt with accordingly.
7. The game starts on Day 1.
8. Nights last for 24 hours, days last for 72 hours. You may not talk during the night phase.
9. If your action fails or is redirected, you will be informed as such.
10. A hammer is required to lynch. It takes over 50% of the total votes in order to hammer. Failure to achieve a lynch twice will result in universal loss.
10a. This includes intentional no lynches.
11. *YLO will not be announced, as you should be able to figure it out for yourselves.
12. Play to win, but don't spoil the enjoyment of others.

Setup:

1x Town Rolecop
1x Town 1-Shot Roleblocker
5x Vanilla Townie

1x Mafia 1-Shot Roleblocker
1x Mafia 1-Shot Rolecop

-If town/scum Roleblocker cross-target while the mafia RB is on the kill, the mafia RB has higher priority and uses up the 1-shot.
-Limited shot roles are not expended if roleblocked otherwise.
-Scum can act and kill.

Living Players (1):

7. Sanaki, Mafia 1-shot Roleblocker, survived.

Dead Players (8):

2. A True Friend, Vanilla Townie, lynched Day 1.
1. 2hu porn star, Vanilla Townie, killed Night 1.
3. dondont151, Mafia 1-shot Rolecop, lynched Day 2.
9. Wadatsumi, Town Rolecop, killed Night 2.
8. Supreme Intelligence, Vanilla Townie, lynched Day 3.

5. Noerin, Town 1-shot Roleblocker, killed Night 3.

4. Jaraxxus, Vanilla Townie, lynched Day 4.

6. Phantom of the Opera, Vanilla Townie, endgamed Day 4.

---

While the game isn't starting until Sunday evening, role pms will go out now. Please confirm in thread that you have access to your anon account by posting with it.

Edited by SB.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 196
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

All pms are out. Below your role pm itself is your account name (used to login) and the password. If you change it, contact me immediately and notify me what it changed to.

For now, just confirm you have access by posting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A True Friend claims to not participate in RVS.

However, looking at the rest of her post, none of what she brings up is better material for discussion.

Opinions on how to optimally play a closed set-up are not linked to alignment.

As of this time, I believe this is because A True Friend is trying to sound controversial and pro-active without really doing anything.


##Vote: A True Friend


Discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A True Friend claims to not participate in RVS.

However, looking at the rest of her post, none of what she brings up is better material for discussion.
Opinions on how to optimally play a closed set-up are not linked to alignment.
As of this time, I believe this is because A True Friend is trying to sound controversial and pro-active without really doing anything.
##Vote: A True Friend
Discuss.

don't like your wording on that first line. i'm not participating in RVS. this is not a claim, this is a fact. additionally, how is it not better material for discussion than votes which have never helped catch scum. in fact my post provoked your reaction (which in turn provoked this post), which has already done more for the game than all of the useless RVS votes have, checkmate atheists.

it doesn't need to be linked to alignment, nor did i ever claim for it to be linked to alignment. maybe i am just trying to see if what i think is the optimal course for night actions is indeed the optimal course for night actions. the whole reason i asked the question now instead of later was so that it wouldn't get in the way of actual discussion.

basically you're trying to paint my actions in a bad light without actually looking for any scum intent. trying to sound controversial isn't alignment relevant, yet somehow that's a bad thing in your eyes. it's rather presumptuous of you to say that i'm "trying to sound pro-active without really doing anything" when literally nothing has happened. maybe i'm being reactionary here, but it just annoys me how your initial impression seems to be that i'm scummy and then you're trying to justify why that's right rather than reaching that conclusion through a logical progression of any sort (this is bad because that's what scum does, or at least something that i do as scum when i'm having trouble naturally formulating content).

##Vote: Wadatsumi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

don't like your wording on that first line. i'm not participating in RVS. this is not a claim, this is a fact. additionally, how is it not better material for discussion than votes which have never helped catch scum. in fact my post provoked your reaction (which in turn provoked this post), which has already done more for the game than all of the useless RVS votes have, checkmate atheists.

it doesn't need to be linked to alignment, nor did i ever claim for it to be linked to alignment. maybe i am just trying to see if what i think is the optimal course for night actions is indeed the optimal course for night actions. the whole reason i asked the question now instead of later was so that it wouldn't get in the way of actual discussion.

basically you're trying to paint my actions in a bad light without actually looking for any scum intent. trying to sound controversial isn't alignment relevant, yet somehow that's a bad thing in your eyes. it's rather presumptuous of you to say that i'm "trying to sound pro-active without really doing anything" when literally nothing has happened. maybe i'm being reactionary here, but it just annoys me how your initial impression seems to be that i'm scummy and then you're trying to justify why that's right rather than reaching that conclusion through a logical progression of any sort (this is bad because that's what scum does, or at least something that i do as scum when i'm having trouble naturally formulating content).

##Vote: Wadatsumi

1. OMGUS vote this early.

2. Really pretentious language deters me from actually reading your post.

##Unvote

##Vote: A true Friend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. It was an OMGUS. Your validation is essentially I don't wanna participate in RVS and you calling me out for it is scum. Since you are adamant in your refusal to participate in "the false positive extravaganza that is the rvs phase" you cannot pass it off as joking around. So this obvious intent to make a case based on the sole information of him not believing you to be making a size able contribution to the advancement of the game.

2. See how that can sound pretentious.

And yeah I do agree, you are using very flowery wording to convey very little meaning. This gives off the illussion that you are contributing to getting the game out of RVS when you haven't brought that much to the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. it was not. i did not vote him just because he voted me, and would have had a similar reaction if he voted anyone else with that logic (perhaps not as pronounced because admittedly i wouldn't actually know their alignment). i don't think he's scum because he called me out for not participating in RVS, just that the justifiation for that is scummy. why is me not participating in RVS bad or have anything to do with my alignment? my case isn't based around him not believing my initial post to contribute to the advancement of the game (like i said, my intent was just to clear up what the optimal use of roles would be), but rather that it was forced and basically just jumped upon me for stuff that wasn't even alignment relevant.

how am i using very flowery wording that conveys very little meaning, this is how i normally write...i want fucking examples, it's just obnoxious when people are like "oh, your wording is flowery and conveys very little meaning" without pointing to what it is. let's assume that i am in the wrong here, how in the hell do you expect me to ever get better at wording things if you just make blanket statements like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...