Jump to content

Voting Gauntlet: Battle on the Beach!


Vaximillian
 Share

Voting Gauntlet: Battle on the Beach poll!  

202 members have voted

  1. 1. Whom are you going to support?



Recommended Posts

Just now, Ice Dragon said:

Actually, based on the forecast, the best chance Leo has is to burn as many flags as possible. At the current pace, Leo will barely fail to recover from the next Gaius multiplier, meaning he wants to push Gaius's multiplier a few hours earlier to give him another few hours to recover.

Well that is better... still sucks though how the multiplier makes it so that spending flags on non-multiplier is basically digging a grave for you round ranking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 minute ago, SageOfAnys said:

Well that is better... still sucks though how the multiplier makes it so that spending flags on non-multiplier is basically digging a grave for you round ranking.

Given how far apart multipliers are after the initial yo-yo, most players will have way more flags than multipliers to spend them on, so it's not too bad.

 

1 minute ago, Oboro! said:

CMON LEO

WE CAN DO IT

GAIUS IS NOTHING BUT WEAK SAUCE

WHAT A LOSER

Maple syrup > ketchup.

Edited by Ice Dragon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ice Dragon said:

I'm basically doing the same thing: turning numbers into words.

 

As for a few other things:

  • Gaius's win in the first round definitely counts as an upset. His team was about 5% smaller and ended up winning because Frederick's team couldn't recover from the last Gaius multiplier.
  • Forecasts for the Voting Gauntlets are actually more interesting than forecasts for the weather because the reactions of the players can affect the outcome.
  • That said, Robin has very little hope to win. Her next multiplier is to far from the end of the round to make Corrin's team unable to recover, but not far enough from the end of the round to get one more multiplier in near the end. However, because the round has only just started, a lot can still change, but it will have to change a lot to have a meaningful effect.
  • Leo's currently projected loss is entirely avoidable. If the current trend continues, he's still in a position for a rally in the last 2 or 3 hours to take back his rightful lead. Leo can also invest some more pressure in the next few hours to push the next Gaius multiplier earlier by about 2 or 3 hours, which can give Leo enough time to recover from the Gaius multiplier.

Listen, I don't care. The point is that forecasts are not always accurate. You act like whatever you say goes here. It's starting to get irritating.

I'm not denying that there's a chance Robin will lose. I actually think that's a bit more likely. But saying she and Leo have no chance are not true.

Edited by Anacybele
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SatsumaFSoysoy said:

So you would support Nohrian Scum just because he is Takumi's friend?

I didn't play Fates so I have no idea who's friendly with who

But I'll just say yes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anacybele said:

Um, what? I don't know, I never actually played FE4. I just know a few story details.

Concerning Seliph and Julia, they start at 490 Love Points- 500 results in marriage. However, their love growth is -5, which means even if you leave them adjacent to each other for a turn, which gives +5 LP, they won't gain a single point. There are two glitch-based workarounds that do let you wed the two, but their marriage dialogue is generic and nothing special happens because the developers didn't expect you to marry the duo.

Why do Seliph and Julia have such a high starting love value? Well they are half siblings, perhaps it's a latent filial love? Perhaps a little mistaken eros on Seliph's part too, but if there is, it is abolished once he learns the truth of his relation to Julia. The negative growth isn't a sign of them not liking each other as the game goes on, it's just to block the chance of the two getting married.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Interdimensional Observer said:

Concerning Seliph and Julia, they start at 490 Love Points- 500 results in marriage. However, their love growth is -5, which means even if you leave them adjacent to each other for a turn, which gives +5 LP, they won't gain a single point. There are two glitch-based workarounds that do let you wed the two, but their marriage dialogue is generic and nothing special happens because the developers didn't expect you to marry the duo.

Why do Seliph and Julia have such a high starting love value? Well they are half siblings, perhaps it's a latent filial love? Perhaps a little mistaken eros on Seliph's part too, but if there is, it is abolished once he learns the truth of his relation to Julia. The negative growth isn't a sign of them not liking each other as the game goes on, it's just to block the chance of the two getting married.

I see. I like to think it implies they deeply care for each other, just not in THAT way. Or they DID have some feelings for each other, it just happened before they knew they were related, a la Star Wars Luke and Leia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Anacybele said:

I'm not denying that there's a chance Robin will lose. I actually think that's a bit more likely. But saying she and Leo have no chance are not true.

Huh? Are you even reading what I write? I never once said either of them have no chance.

 

@Beddlam Thanks for the more level-headed answer. I'm starting to lose my cool a bit.

Edited by Ice Dragon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Anacybele said:

Listen, I don't care. The point is that forecasts are not always accurate. You act like whatever you say goes here. It's starting to get irritating.

I'm not denying that there's a chance Robin will lose. I actually think that's a bit more likely. But saying she and Leo have no chance are not true.

I think you misunderstand what forecasts are. They aren't telling the future, they are telling trajectory according to current evidence. They aren't set in stone, and just because they don't prove to be 100% accurate doesn't make them a bad forecast. As Ice Dragon has done, any good forecaster knows that they aren't showing you how it will be, but a range of possible outcomes with relative likely-hood. The chart shows you the results if current trends continue, but as Ice Dragon has clearly indicated in his posts, this actually points to a range of possible outcomes that, in this case, can be effected by the actions of the players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Oboro! said:

I didn't play Fates so I have no idea who's friendly with who

But I'll just say yes!

Just letting you know because I think it's kinda funny, Oboro actually has a skill that boosts her damage output against Nohrians because she's one of the few especially racist Hoshidans in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ice Dragon said:

Actually, based on the forecast, the best chance Leo has is to burn as many flags as possible. At the current pace, Leo will barely fail to recover from the next Gaius multiplier, meaning he wants to push Gaius's multiplier a few hours earlier to give him another few hours to recover.

Sigh, this is stressful. But I'm going to follow your advice and just hope the rest of the team is somehow on the same page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Beddlam said:

I think you misunderstand what forecasts are. They aren't telling the future, they are telling trajectory according to current evidence. They aren't set in stone, and just because they don't prove to be 100% accurate doesn't make them a bad forecast. As Ice Dragon has done, any good forecaster knows that they aren't showing you how it will be, but a range of possible outcomes with relative likely-hood. The chart shows you the results if current trends continue, but as Ice Dragon has clearly indicated in his posts, this actually points to a range of possible outcomes that, in this case, can be effected by the actions of the players.

I don't mean it's a bad forecast. I just think it's bad to act like that the forecast is definitely going to happen and that there's no chance it's wrong.

Ice Dragon, you did say Robin had no chance.

Edited by Anacybele
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Anacybele said:

Ice Dragon, you did say Robin had no chance.

Whenever I use qualifiers on my statements, I really do mean them in full.

 

39 minutes ago, Ice Dragon said:

Robin has basically no chance against Corrin because of where the multiplier is going to hit. Team Robin needs to either speed up their point acquisition to move their next multiplier forward by something like 10 hours or slow down their point acquisition to move their next multiplier backwards by something like 10 hours, and neither of those are statistically plausible.

"Basically no chance" is not the same as "no chance". It's not statistically plausible, but it could happen. It's like pulling a perfect-nature off-banner Ryoma.

26 minutes ago, Ice Dragon said:

That said, Robin has very little hope to win. Her next multiplier is to far from the end of the round to make Corrin's team unable to recover, but not far enough from the end of the round to get one more multiplier in near the end. However, because the round has only just started, a lot can still change, but it will have to change a lot to have a meaningful effect.

"Very little hope" is also not the same as "no chance".

And in both cases, I gave information about exactly what needs to happen to improve that chance. It's still early in the round. Anything could still happen.

If I ever meant "no chance", I would have said it straight up instead of dodging around. I'm sure I've had some flat out "yeah, no" moments in other threads you can use for reference when I really do mean "no way in hell".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ice Dragon said:

"Basically no chance" is not the same as "no chance". It's not statistically plausible, but it could happen. It's like pulling a perfect-nature off-banner Ryoma.

So that's where all my luck went. Darn.

Anyone here moving to Team Leo from Elise?

Edited by MrSmokestack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Ice Dragon said:

Maple syrup > ketchup.

I mean, yes, but suntanning vampire is still better than candy thief.

40 minutes ago, Ice Dragon said:

Actually, based on the forecast, the best chance Leo has is to burn as many flags as possible. At the current pace, Leo will barely fail to recover from the next Gaius multiplier, meaning he wants to push Gaius's multiplier a few hours earlier to give him another few hours to recover.

Aw, crud, so you mean Leo is, for the most part, losing to Gaius?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, SageOfAnys said:

Just letting you know because I think it's kinda funny, Oboro actually has a skill that boosts her damage output against Nohrians because she's one of the few especially racist Hoshidans in the game.

I know about that skill!

And she's not racist! She gets along with some Nohrian people!

Even Niles of all creeps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GuiltyLove said:

I WAS FIRST

ALSO WHERE IS UR CAMUS

I HAVEN'T BEEN GETTING HIM

WHY DOES THIS MATTER TO PEOPLE SO MUCH?

Also, that's weird. Your Catria has been showing up for me quite a lot. I even needed her to tank a hit from a bow again, because I only had flyers left, and neither one rounded that candy man. She made sure to kill him afterwards though.

WHAT DO YOU FEED HER TO BE SO BULKY?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bartozio said:

WHY DOES THIS MATTER TO PEOPLE SO MUCH?

 

wut

Just now, Bartozio said:

Also, that's weird. Your Catria has been showing up for me quite a lot. I even needed her to tank a hit from a bow again, because I only had flyers left, and neither one rounded that candy man. She made sure to kill him afterwards though.

 

LOL

Just now, Bartozio said:

WHAT DO YOU FEED HER TO BE SO BULKY?

In Taiwan there are these things called "pig's blood cake". I made the same thing except with the blood of all the Reinhardts I killed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...