MystletainnNavi
-
Posts
36 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by MystletainnNavi
-
-
Why did that send twice....
-
2 minutes ago, unique said:
i accept this explanation purely because the idea of falchion being a sexist who has to stop being sexist to save the world is hilarious
Who's ever heard of a sentient swo- Oh wait, Skyward Sword exists
-
1 minute ago, unique said:
i accept this explanation purely because the idea of falchion being a sexist who has to stop being sexist to save the world is hilarious
Who's ever heard of a sentient swo- Oh wait, Skyward Sword exists
-
Game Theory: Is the FALCHION MISOGYNIST????
-
Just now, unique said:
if you've played FE12, the bonus missions (not the wifi ones) are remakes of the archanea saga maps
so if you've done those you've pretty much played it
Trust me, I've played FE 12; it's my favourite by miles. But I've simply never gotten around to the bonus missions.
-
There might also be more that I'm missing about the stuff between Shadow Dragon and New Mystery, cause I've yet to play the Archanea Saga, and I REALLY need to.
-
1 minute ago, Hero of the Fire Emblems said:
Why would he? He's back and he can fuck up Hardin's day, so I feel like not having a body is just a minor annoyance to him.
He's back and I doubt he cares about not having a body.He'd need a body to even be able to give it to Hardin though, wouldn't he?
-
Just now, Hero of the Fire Emblems said:
He had the good sense to swap the orbs for fakes at least.
But in the end, it never even mattered, since Grima just freaking awakened himself, because who cares about a plot that makes sense.
-
Just now, Hero of the Fire Emblems said:
Where is this not being smart coming from
"HEY, LET'S TOTALLY BRING THE FIRE EMBLEM, IT'S TOTALLY NOT A TRAP OR ANYTHING AND VALIDAR'S GONNA STEAL IT, RIGHT, HAHAH"
I just... really don't like Chrom...
-
Just now, RedEyedDrake said:
The Japanese language has a lot more gender neutral terms than the English language.
Not to go off subject, but why can't all languages be like this???? I feel really bad for nb people who speak French, cause there's no neutral pronouns at all.
Okay, but back to FE. I still don't get the name changes with the continent.
-
3 minutes ago, Hero of the Fire Emblems said:
Chrom still acts like Falchion is a singular sword
Chrom's also kinda not very smart, as we all know.
-
Just now, Hero of the Fire Emblems said:
It's said to be the selfsame one that Marth uses, iirc, and Chrom says only a single one exists- Nagi's existence in 11 seems non canonical to the timeline of 12 and 13.
Oh shoot, you're right, cause Marth says he doesn't recognize her.
However, the point of multiple Falchions still stands.
-
On the subject of the Falchion, I just remembered that there do exist multiple Falchions. Nagi provides Marth with a less powerful one. So presumably that's one of her fangs? She could have made another, but constructing it differently, for the one in Awakening.
-
To note something that's actually against the point I was originally arguing: Naga
Naga ends his existence after he puts Tiki to sleep. But we see Naga in Awakening as a female. The only logical explanation I can think of is that Nagi takes Naga's place. Medeus does refer to her as Naga's reincarnation.
-
To be honest, you guys are making some very good points. My perspective has shifted a little. Though I still don't like to think of it as canon, cause I'm a filthy Archanea fangirl.
-
Just now, Hero of the Fire Emblems said:
Before we even approach the suggestion, there is a damn reason they redesigned Falchion in 11/12 to NOT look like Tyrfing.
This is very true. It was subtle though, as the only real difference is the hilt. I never really thought it looked that much like the Tyrfing though, cause the Tyrfing has a green base.
-
1 minute ago, IcyHeroGamer said:
It's entirely possible that the Falchion is a Baldur thing, but it's unlikely.
Kinda off topic, but I like to think of Marth having Baldur blood, Merric having Sety blood, and Hardin having Nova or Dain blood.
-
1 minute ago, Hero of the Fire Emblems said:
Zelda begs to differ. Less than 10,000 years and a fucking ice age changes Hyrule like Play-Doh. Fictional plate techtonics are a lot more volitile
Good God, please, let's not talk about Zelda continuity, my brain hurts enough as is.
3 minutes ago, Salamud said:Naga's Falchion being boy-only is an artifact of the Lore before Genealogy of the Holy War happpened. I mean, if we're applying GotHW and Awakening's holy blood with its brands then shouldn't have the ability to use the sword since he's directly descended from Anri's brother.
It's entirely possible that the Falchion is a Baldur thing, but it's unlikely.
The Holy Weapons came into existence because Galle went to presumably Archanea to drink the dragon's blood, and then all the Loptyr stuff happened, and the crusaders, and blah blah blah.
-
2 minutes ago, RedEyedDrake said:
No, it didn't. Medeus' revival has nothing to do with the Binding Shield. What you meant to say was "the Earth Dragons' unsealing".
Medeus was still an Earth Dragon, so his seal would have been lost.
To address the Lucina Falchion thingy
Granted it should be taken with a grain of salt, because localization stuff.
-
Just now, Gustavos said:
Err, I would have put this in the Awakening subforum, or perhaps General Fire Emblem since this discussion should also involve Gaiden and its soon to be released remake, and that's just too many games for it to fit in one's subforum.
That's my b. I instinctively did it because the conversation originally started in an Echoes thread.
-
5 minutes ago, r_n said:
You could have made one
I've little experience on forums, and am kinda shy, but I went ahead and made one, if anyone's up to talk about it.
-
Awakening did a poor job of keeping the continuity set up by Shadow Dragon and New Mystery of the Emblem, having retconned quite a bit of the lore.
Examples: Medeus' revival, Lucina's ability to use the Falchion, geography, degenerating, and so forth
I want to here others' takes on it, but I'll probably still debate (not in a mean way) that there is just about no continuity.
-
Just now, GrimmLow said:
Ok time to move this Achanea vs Awakening discussion elsewhere. This thread that was supposed to be about data mining and questions about is turning into something totally different.
I was waiting for someone to make one, thinking they would ;-;
-
Just now, Corrobin said:
Pretty sure that's a translation mistake.
Was it? My knowledge of the Japanese versions isn't quite as extensive as I might hope it to be.
3 minutes ago, RedEyedDrake said:I'm pretty sure that in the Japanese version Elice says that "Marth is the only one who can do it". Which I think speaks for itself.
I guess that answers the question.
Fire Emblem 7 - 80 HP Hack
in Fire Emblem
Posted
Hey, guys. I've been working on a ROM hack of Fire Emblem 7, making various adjustments (about which I may update from time to time) similar to the fashion of FE 8 Master Mode, and one of them is the overall HP cap being raised to 80, like in FE 4.
Now, I've gone into the hex, and went to the following offsets and changed 3C(60) to 50(80): 017C7C, 029996, 0299AC. As for raising the HP cap, this worked perfectly! However, in testing I've run into a number of issues about which I'll elaborate in the order they occurred.
I went to turn three. The battle window said Hector would double the General and that the General had a 28% chance of hitting. Hector attacks, and does damage just fine. The General retaliates, and surprisingly hits. But then the General attacked again, and hit again. I burned RN several times, and every time the General would hit and double. As for enemy phase, it played like it normally would just fine. I restarted, went to turn three (this oddity did not occur on turn two, and Hector could not reach the General on turn one), attacked again, and it still happened. I continued to try this on multiple different turns after two, and wound up with the same result. And then, to top it all off, the General landed a critical hit, despite having a 0% crit rate.
Basically, what I'm hoping for is that I just did it slightly incorrect, and somebody could set me back on track. Thanks, everyone!