Jump to content

guacamole

Member
  • Posts

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by guacamole

  1. It pleases me to no end that people are getting SO MAD over this.

    "Guess I better import/steal the game. That'll show em!"

    "What's next, they cut out death?! Will FE15 be for 3-year olds?!"

    "There is objectively NOTHING wrong with wanting to grope my animu girlfriend and Treehouse are monsters for denying me my GOD GIVEN RIGHT to do so"

    It's like it's my birthday, the only difference is I don't usually get salt as a birthday present. :XD:

  2. Guys. Guys. It's called fantasy armour for a reason. Plus, if you really wanted realism, everyone would have to be in full plate armor to take even half the hits they actually take. Even the mages.

    There's fantasy armor, and then there's just stupid, ugly and impractical design choices for the sake of "sex appeal". Yes, Fire Emblem is a fantasy game, but keep in mind that female units USED to be armored like this:

    FEPR_Titania.png

    Even female dark mages were more suited for combat and didn't go running around half-naked:

    FEFT_Sophia.png

    FE has always been a fantasy series with fantasy elements and fantasy designs, but the difference between Awakening/Fates and the rest of the series is the integrity IS gave to its characters, both in personailty and appearance.

  3. Exactly. Camilla(and Charlotte as well) is perfect the way she is and I'm a little sick of this constant instance that women in games have to covered, no cleavage or anything. Do you have any idea how ridiculous it is to constantly complain about that?

    Um, your opinion is the opposite of the one you quoted, ie not opposed to Camilla cencorship.

  4. Assuming that "Mild Suggestive themes" is a heavier sentence than regular suggestive themes, that would mean this game would have to be less suggestive than Awakening, right?

    If that's the case, some content definitely probably got cut. My guess is the bath house.

    EDIT: Wait, I think I got that backward. Still wouldn't be surprised if some stuff was changed/cut, though.

  5. No censorship is good. If the artists and writers didn't want you to experience the story in that manner, they wouldn't have written it that way.

    Removing references to incest and child brides wouldn't be a good thing?

    There comes a point where one has to admit that the "artists and writers" are not flawless human beings, and the subculture this game is mostly geared towards (otakus) even less so. If anyone desperately needs this game to be filled with creepy and disgusting fetishes, they can play the Japanese version.

  6. Couldn't get into it. Played a bit of it because I thought the morality aspect was neat, but got put off by all the exaggerated, forced "quirkiness". The Mother series is quirky but never to the point of things being completely random, which this game seems to do a lot. Not to mention the very tedious puzzles, sparce and disjointed plot, and weird battle system that belongs in a seperate genre entirely.

    IMO it's like Earthbound x Homestuck, but more annoying. I stopped playing at the snow level.

  7. I wouldn't say it's so clear cut on which version is more "graphic" than the other

    Plus I'm not sure if we're focusing on the fanservice, or the violence anymore

    Well since I assume both versions have about the same amount of fanservice and sexual content, what would be a deciding factor in whether or not one gets a higher rating is the violence. For all I know, both could potentially get an M, but it seems a lot more certain with Conquest.

  8. In either case I think that just strengthens the possibility and likelihood of Fates recieving an M rating as well, considering most of what happens in AA is simply people talking about intense violence, whereas this game actually lets you see it.

    Another thought did cross my mind: what if White/Birthright is rated T while Black/Conquest is rated M, being the darker story with the more graphic imagery? Would one version sell more than the other if that were the case?

  9. To everyone saying this game couldn't possibly recieve an M rating due to its content, just consider that Ace Attorney Dual Destinies recieved an M rating, with the only reasons listed "Violence, Blood, Suggestive Themes, Language". Anyone who's played the AA series knows that nothing in the games ever gets too graphic, and to this day I'm still unsure where the M rating comes from.

    Also, ratings in general have been getting more strict in the last few years (like Chrono Trigger and Eathbound being raised to T).

  10. I don't think I can look at Frederick anymore without imagining him being a Pyromaniac.

    SAM_0014_zpsd4b3a07a.jpg

    I know these things are generic, but still, It'd be funny to imagine him burning things down.

    Wait, it's possible to view supports in the demo? How?

  11. Ugh, it's so stupid how people are complaining about the name "Sully" reminding them of Monsters, Inc. when it was around long before that. It doesn't even have the same spelling. Hell, I've never heard anyone say that Monsters, Inc. ruined Uncharted for them.

×
×
  • Create New...