lolDeath Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 for the love of all that is pure and right in this world, stop bumping this topic up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral "Bull" Halsey Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 (edited) This news is so old... Edited February 5, 2010 by Namie Amuro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judas Posted February 7, 2010 Share Posted February 7, 2010 pics or it didnt happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inui Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 This topic makes very glad to have a penis and not a vagina. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiba Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 this is the best topic ever for women Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defeatist Elitist Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 This topic makes very glad to have a penis and not a vagina. Pics or it didn't happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inui Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 Pics or it didn't happen. ROFL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix Wright Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 for the love of all that is pure and right in this world, stop bumping this topic up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Alear Posted February 14, 2010 Share Posted February 14, 2010 Pics or it didn't happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix Posted February 14, 2010 Share Posted February 14, 2010 @ second set of pics... That's not a tail is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Alear Posted February 14, 2010 Share Posted February 14, 2010 It's a tentacle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defeatist Elitist Posted February 14, 2010 Share Posted February 14, 2010 Have I ever told you I love you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Alear Posted February 15, 2010 Share Posted February 15, 2010 (edited) Have I ever told you I love you? Yes. Have I ever told you I love you? Edited February 15, 2010 by SeverIan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Alear Posted February 15, 2010 Share Posted February 15, 2010 (edited) Hmm. My former post caused me to contemplate Derrida's discussion of the "mark of deletion" as used by Heidegger. The restoriation of being as "transcending" the categories of the entity, the opening of the fundamental ontology, are nothing but necessary yet provisional moments. From The INtroduction to Metaphysics onwards, Heidegger renounces the project of and the word ontology. The necessary, originary, and completely irreducible dissimulation of the meaning of being, its occultation within the very blossoming forth of presence, that retreat without which there would be no history of being which was completely history and the history of being, Heidegger's insistence on noting that being is produced as history only through the logos, and is nothing outside of it, the difference between being and the eternity - all this clearly indicates that fundamentally nothing escaped the movement of the signifer and that, in the last instance, the difference between signified and signifier is nothing. This proposition of transgression, not yet integrated into a careful discourse, runs the risk of formulating regression itself. One must therefore go by way of the question of being as it is directed by Heidegger and by him alone, at and beyond onto-theology, in order to reach the rigorous thought of that strange nondifference and in order to determine it correctly. Heidegger occasionally reminds us that "being" as it is fixed in its general syntactic and lexicological forms within linguistics and Western philosophy, is not a primary and absolutely irreducible signified, that it is still rooted in a system of languages and an historically determined "significance" although strangely privileged as the virtue of disclosure and dissimulation; particularly when he invites us to meditate on the "privilege" of the "third person singular of the present indicative" and the "infinitive." Western metaphysics, as the limitation of the sense of being within the field of presence, is produced as the domination of a linguistic form. To question the origin of that domination does not amount to hypostatizing a transcendental singified, but to a questioning of what constitutes our history and what produced transcendentality itself. Heidegger brings it up also when in Zur Seinsfrage, for the same reason, he lets the word "being" be read only if it is crossed out (kreuzweise Durchstreichung). That mark of deletion is not, however, a "merely negative simbol" (p. 31) [p. 83]. That deletion is the final writing of an epoch. Under its strokes the presence of a transcendental signified is effaced while still remaining legible. Is effeced while still remaining legible, is destroyed while making visible the very idea of the sign. In as much as it de-limits onto-theology, the metaphysics of presence and logocentrism, this last writing is also the first writing. Edited February 15, 2010 by SeverIan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esau of Isaac Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Funny, I'd always thought you were a bit taller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Alear Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 (edited) Those were pics of Inui to prove he developed a penis and not a vagina. It's not a picture of either of us now. I look like this now: Here is a pic of me and Inui: Edited February 22, 2010 by SeverIan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts