Zkirsche Posted December 5, 2009 Share Posted December 5, 2009 Best: FE10 Ike Worst: Micaiah, if only because she's a mary-sue (and I have only played FE9 and 10) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bananas Posted December 5, 2009 Share Posted December 5, 2009 Best: Alm >: ( Worst: Roy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DragonBladeSniper Posted December 5, 2009 Share Posted December 5, 2009 I have to renominate best/worse couple? Even though I nominated it like... half a year ago? XD Best: FE10 Ike, I haven't played or watched FE1-5 (except 2, I played a bit) and he is just like... AMAZING!!! He was also good in PoR though. Worst: (not voting) Like last time, I WON'T CHOOSE ROY!!!! awesome: He deserves better. So I'll choose... ummm... No idea. XD I won't vote for worst. Just to save time for you I'll just mention I ain't voting at the beginning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fei Mao Posted December 5, 2009 Share Posted December 5, 2009 Best: Sigurd Worst: Roy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#!/dev/haru Posted December 5, 2009 Share Posted December 5, 2009 Best: Sigurd Worst: Ike Guy's overrated as hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Tarrasque Posted December 5, 2009 Share Posted December 5, 2009 Serv and Volbo say hi. And no, I'm not basing that statement off of grinding(I don't grind in FE2. I generally just play easy mode and only do side battles so as to recruit extra characters/get items). And no, she really doesn't do all to well late in the game due to her poor str and semi bad HP(which is important for magic users). She's obviously the best unit for the first battle of the game when you look at your other units during that chapter (Boey.....) Serv was only slightly more durable than Celica... around their start and Celice did more damage with Magic than he did as well as being able to attack from range so she didn't need to eat a counter-attack. Valbo, more durable, less damage again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CassieCinders Posted December 5, 2009 Share Posted December 5, 2009 Best: Celice I don't like Sigurd Worst: ...dunno, I'm voting Micaiah, because I don't really like her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narga_Rocks Posted December 5, 2009 Share Posted December 5, 2009 Worst: Ike Guy's overrated as hell. What does that have to do with anything? If at least one other Lord is, say, a 6, and Ike is a 6.5, but everyone calls Ike a 9, he's very much overrated, but still better than the 6. Even if he is overrated, he's among the best in fe10. Even if you don't like "Top tier" for him, he's easily "high tier". But if your standard for best and worst is: best: most accurately tiered worst: least accurately tiered then maybe based on what you said Ike can be "worst". Otherwise, I have to say: What? You also didn't specify which Ike you are talking about. The first post has a list from which you can choose, but you did not choose from that list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#!/dev/haru Posted December 5, 2009 Share Posted December 5, 2009 Worst: Ike Guy's overrated as hell. What does that have to do with anything? If at least one other Lord is, say, a 6, and Ike is a 6.5, but everyone calls Ike a 9, he's very much overrated, but still better than the 6. Even if he is overrated, he's among the best in fe10. Even if you don't like "Top tier" for him, he's easily "high tier". But if your standard for best and worst is: best: most accurately tiered worst: least accurately tiered then maybe based on what you said Ike can be "worst". Otherwise, I have to say: What? You also didn't specify which Ike you are talking about. The first post has a list from which you can choose, but you did not choose from that list. I meant "The guy's as overrated as hell". I don't care about the list. It's stupid to seperate them based on the game. They're still the same Ike. And either way, I like every lord in the series better than Ike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Intoner Two Posted December 5, 2009 Share Posted December 5, 2009 Best: Celice Worst: Lyn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narga_Rocks Posted December 5, 2009 Share Posted December 5, 2009 What does that have to do with anything? I meant "The guy's as overrated as hell". I know what you meant. I'm just saying being overrated does not necessarily make you the worst. I don't care about the list. It's stupid to seperate them based on the game. They're still the same Ike. But his abilities are different: His stats are completely different, his class is different, his tier 2 caps are different, he eventually gets axes, his growths are way different, Aether is different: (skill/2)% rather than skill%. Even Ragnell is different since it no longer negates non-wrath crits. Basically, nearly everything about him is different. Thus, he's a different character. I could consider Leaf to be better than otherwise if I include his fe4 incarnation. But as far as this question is concerned, he's just the fe5 Leaf and not the combination of fe4 and fe5. Master Knight is a pretty amazing class. And either way, I like every lord in the series better than Ike. And that's the reason he is "worst" to you, which is fine. But "Ike" is still not a valid response because it doesn't specify which one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candlejack Posted December 5, 2009 Share Posted December 5, 2009 Besides, it can be statistically proven by facts and calculations that many lords are worse than either Ike. *AHEMRoyAHEM* The only good thing about Roy is that Sword of Seals is the best Prf Sword ever. If they made it with unlimited uses, it'd be one of the best weapons OF all time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT075 Posted December 5, 2009 Share Posted December 5, 2009 Best: Ike (FE10) Honorable mention: Sigurd I'd swap them, except that even though Sigurd ORKO's at base, he does actually get worse as the game progresses. In short, he goes from "Godly" to "Eh". Ike goes from "Awesome" to "Godly". Worst: Roy His only redeeming factor is that he's great until he levelcaps, and once he FINALLY promotes, he gets the SoS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candlejack Posted December 5, 2009 Share Posted December 5, 2009 I nominate Best/Worst Unlockable Character. This counts for anyone unlocked after beating campaign (Or beating it a certain number of times) and includes Pelleas and Lehran as well as the others in FE's 6, 8, and 9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luftwaffe Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Best: Ike (FE10) Honorable mention: Sigurd I'd swap them, except that even though Sigurd ORKO's at base, he does actually get worse as the game progresses. In short, he goes from "Godly" to "Eh". Ike goes from "Awesome" to "Godly". Sigurd never goes to 'eh.' Just refer to his average stats. He still beats nearly all mounted units statistically. He also provides leadership bonuses and gets a broken ass weapon in the final chapter. There's also a series on youtube of Sigurd soloing the entire part of his game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT075 Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Best: Ike (FE10) Honorable mention: Sigurd I'd swap them, except that even though Sigurd ORKO's at base, he does actually get worse as the game progresses. In short, he goes from "Godly" to "Eh". Ike goes from "Awesome" to "Godly". Sigurd never goes to 'eh.' Just refer to his average stats. He still beats nearly all mounted units statistically. He also provides leadership bonuses and gets a broken ass weapon in the final chapter. There's also a series on youtube of Sigurd soloing the entire part of his game. Screw stats, Personal experience means everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candlejack Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 My Roy capped everything with all the stat-ups I got. So clearly Roy is the best lord ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT075 Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 My Roy capped everything with all the stat-ups I got. So clearly Roy is the best lord ever. Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anouleth Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Best: FE10 Ike Worst: Lyn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just call me AL Posted December 7, 2009 Share Posted December 7, 2009 Best: I'm gonna go with Sigurd. (With Lyn, Hector, and Ike as honorable mention.) Worst: Roy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkhead Posted December 7, 2009 Share Posted December 7, 2009 Best: FE9 Ike, he is really useful earlygame, with all the axeusers around, he will double most of them and hits quite hard too, he is durable and has great supports with Soren & Oscar. Worst: Leaf, has bad stats, bad growths, he will not be too useful earlygame where most units are soldiers and have WTA ove him, the FE5 RNG isn't helping him out either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Klingy Posted December 7, 2009 Share Posted December 7, 2009 Best: It's a tough choice between Ike (FE10) and Sigurd. Both start off and end up awesome. Both tend to be a bit vunerable to mages, but since Sigurd gets a weapon that eliminates this weakness, I'll have to vote for him. Worst: Again it's a tough choice, this time between Leaf and Roy. Saying Roy premotes 'late' is a MASSIVE understatement, and Leaf sucks even after premotion. Although SoS means Roy as actually pretty good after he premotes, while Leaf's redeeming quality is a fluctuating leadership. (mostly 1 or 2) So I'll have to say Leaf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiff Posted December 7, 2009 Share Posted December 7, 2009 Best: Sigurd (FE4) - A mounted unit in a mount-dominated game. A sword user in a game where swords are the best physical weapon. A Jeigan that never stops being useful. He gets a Silver Sword on the very first chapter (and can always use it because of the repair system), and a 30 might holy sword later on. The dude has everything going his way. Worst: Lyn (FE7) - Bad defense, bad constitution, and meh strength with two underwhelming weapon types. Not an outstanding unit by any stretch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalis Posted December 8, 2009 Share Posted December 8, 2009 Best: Sigurd (FE4) - A mounted unit in a mount-dominated game. A sword user in a game where swords are the best physical weapon. A Jeigan that never stops being useful. He gets a Silver Sword on the very first chapter (and can always use it because of the repair system), and a 30 might holy sword later on. The dude has everything going his way. Worst: Lyn (FE7) - Bad defense, bad constitution, and meh strength with two underwhelming weapon types. Not an outstanding unit by any stretch. Statistic and unit-wise, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narga_Rocks Posted December 8, 2009 Share Posted December 8, 2009 A Jeigan that never stops being useful. Considering the difference between a promoted unit and a not-promoted unit in that game is simply the one that starts before level 20 with a promotion just gets its promo bonuses earlier (including the horse), I'm not sure you can actually call him a Jeigan. It isn't like he has fewer levels to grow than other characters or gets less experience. And without those promo bonuses his stats are about the same as Alec's at first (all but two stats are the same actually) and they are close in level so it isn't like he has bad bases for his level, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.