Jump to content

What would be reasonable for "FE5 style" rankings?


Recommended Posts

Using my 0% log as a guideline, I'd suggest:

AAA: 290 turns

AA: 305 turns

A: 320 turns

And 20 turns for each subsequent lower rank. Not having 50 characters alive by the end of the game reduces rank by 1.

Does this seem reasonable? Is 290 turns too "easy," considering that my 293 turns was achieved with base characters only? Are the spacings reasonable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does this seem reasonable? Is 290 turns too "easy," considering that my 293 turns was achieved with base characters only? Are the spacings reasonable?

I think the best idea would be to either playtest these rankings to be feasible or to srougne up documented playthroughs to get an idea of what turncounts people hit. I dunno, even though you were limiting yourself in that playthrough, you are much better at FE then the "average" player such as myself so yeah, I'd wait for more "data" to appear before finalising anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the best idea would be to either playtest these rankings to be feasible or to srougne up documented playthroughs to get an idea of what turncounts people hit... I'd wait for more "data" to appear before finalising anything.

I agree.

So to everyone else out there: hurry up with your playthroughs and play more efficiently. And recruit all the characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree.

So to everyone else out there: hurry up with your playthroughs and play more efficiently. And recruit all the characters.

Why didn't you tell me this Cath-ages ago? :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...