Integrity Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 Mount and Blade's multiplayer is generally bollocks. I decided to grind out the Steam achievements anyway, and today was graced with this gem. [spoiler=wiiiiiidescreen, check the chat log] Poor boy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riariadne Posted December 20, 2010 Share Posted December 20, 2010 Marcus is trolololing you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deleted35362 Posted December 20, 2010 Share Posted December 20, 2010 'The hell is an ITT? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riariadne Posted December 20, 2010 Share Posted December 20, 2010 In This Thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erk Posted December 20, 2010 Share Posted December 20, 2010 DUDE. M&B FTW. FUCK YAH! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel M Posted December 20, 2010 Share Posted December 20, 2010 Mine pwns bitches and hos across the lands. IN TWO GAMES! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Alear Posted December 20, 2010 Share Posted December 20, 2010 In This Thread. U sure it ain't in this topic? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parrhesia Posted December 20, 2010 Share Posted December 20, 2010 Marcus finally got revenge on the little bitch. ...And nice to see Lyn catch a javelin through the face, too. Ahh, this makes me lust for Warbands yet further...get Lord Furetchen a REAL title. His unique war-howl of "TIME TO BAKE THE PIES!" shall echo through the hills of Nordregion once again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iced Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 (edited) I like M&B's multiplayer :( still, nothing compares to my army consisting nearly entirely of khergit Lancers in single player. Crossbowmen and footmen are kept in garrison for when I need them. M&B does get boring quickly once you are the most powerful lord in existence :( Edited December 21, 2010 by Iced Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erk Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 I like M&B's multiplayer :( still, nothing compares to my army consisting nearly entirely of khergit Lancers in single player. Crossbowmen and footmen are kept in garrison for when I need them. M&B does get boring quickly once you are the most powerful lord in existence :( Try playing on full realism, like you die....quickly. Put all damage to normal, and get rid of all HUD, like troop icons and damage and stuff. And no cheats. Thats hard shit right there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iced Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Try playing on full realism, like you die....quickly. Put all damage to normal, and get rid of all HUD, like troop icons and damage and stuff. And no cheats. Thats hard shit right there. That is sort of how I play (except the hud bit, that's just silly) it's very difficult at the start (you get captured.....a lot) but once you get a good force together it gets much easier very quickly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 What is this, CoD with medieval weapons? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riariadne Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 U sure it ain't in this topic? They both work. :/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erk Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 What is this, CoD with medieval weapons? lululululz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity Posted December 22, 2010 Author Share Posted December 22, 2010 I play 98% difficulty. The only reason it's not 100% is because I have my battle limit set to 100 and the game speed set to Normal instead of Fast. Either of those would kick it to 100+%. But me, I horde Rhodok Sharpshooters with any flavor of infantry (except Sarranids) in front of them. Biggest points for a line of Sharpshooters behind a line of Nord Huscarls. Except recently at Furetchen's behest I've been recruiting a bunch of Vaegirs... Also: always Rhodok Sharpshooters, never Swadians. Swadian Sharpshooters suck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momo Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 Marcus was sick of Eliwood forcing him to stay in the army, so he killed his son. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iced Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 But me, I horde Rhodok Sharpshooters with any flavor of infantry (except Sarranids) in front of them. Biggest points for a line of Sharpshooters behind a line of Nord Huscarls. Except recently at Furetchen's behest I've been recruiting a bunch of Vaegirs... Also: always Rhodok Sharpshooters, never Swadians. Swadian Sharpshooters suck. Does anyone else feel the Sarranids are kind of underpowered at the moment? All of the other factions have some sort of specialty (well except for the Khergits but thats only because the AI has no idea how to use Horse Archers) but the Sarranids just seem to chill in their desert and not do much in my games. Swadia make up for it by being ridiculously good at everything else once they get men at arms/Infantary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity Posted December 22, 2010 Author Share Posted December 22, 2010 Sarranids suck balls, except for Mamlukes. Mamlukes are the single best open-field unit in the game bar none, and among the best units to staff castles with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.