Darros Posted November 6, 2012 Share Posted November 6, 2012 Today in math we had this little assignment, and gave me a bit of trouble. I think I got it right, but I'm really not sure. There was a little issue with factoring, and I'm just wondering what exactly the answer was. I don't have mine back and probably won't for a few days. It's kind of bugging me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobflac Posted November 6, 2012 Share Posted November 6, 2012 You know, it has been years since I did Calc, but I could not walk away until I at least tried this. I got (x+6)(x-1)^2 / x(x-2)^2 but again, I am way too rusty, and I am not too terribly confident in that answer. I can try to show my work if you want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darros Posted November 6, 2012 Author Share Posted November 6, 2012 I think that was similar to what I had, but my denominator was different. I had (x)(x-2)(x^2-3x-2) or something like that. The quadratic there was a headache because it didn't factor and I ended up with huge decimals in my restrictions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity Posted November 6, 2012 Share Posted November 6, 2012 (edited) pain in the ass but hang on lemme get out my paper that was pretty fun thanks ANSWER: (x-1)2(x+1)(x+6) ----------------------- x(x-2)(x2-3x-2) EDIT: do you like my perfectly formatted fraction that was pretty fun thanks EDIT: oh yeah restrictions if they want what I think they want: function is undefined at x = 0, x = 2, and x = 3 +/- sqrt(17) quantity over 2. simplification is defined but not equal to the original function (f(x) would have been undefined) at x = 1, x = -1 EDIT2: actually after some more thought I suspect "restrictions" only means "when is the original function undefined but the simplification is defined" which would be only x = 1 and x = -1 that's the kind of thing I'd ask my professor on a test though Edited November 6, 2012 by Mr. Sparkles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity Posted November 6, 2012 Share Posted November 6, 2012 (edited) Well, fuck me. Did not realize this wasn't FFtF. I need to start checking ;/ Edited November 6, 2012 by Mr. Sparkles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity Posted November 6, 2012 Share Posted November 6, 2012 (edited) legit double-post here EDIT: which of course comes after a deliberate double-post to make a triple-post :| Edited November 6, 2012 by Mr. Sparkles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grace Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 ANSWER: (x-1)2(x+1)(x+6) ----------------------- x(x-2)(x2-3x-2) I did it and arrived to the exact same answer. Integ pretty much hit the nail on the head with the restrictions as well, so yeah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darros Posted November 7, 2012 Author Share Posted November 7, 2012 (edited) pain in the ass but hang on lemme get out my paper that was pretty fun thanks ANSWER: (x-1)2(x+1)(x+6) ----------------------- x(x-2)(x2-3x-2) EDIT: do you like my perfectly formatted fraction that was pretty fun thanks EDIT: oh yeah restrictions if they want what I think they want: function is undefined at x = 0, x = 2, and x = 3 +/- sqrt(17) quantity over 2. simplification is defined but not equal to the original function (f(x) would have been undefined) at x = 1, x = -1 EDIT2: actually after some more thought I suspect "restrictions" only means "when is the original function undefined but the simplification is defined" which would be only x = 1 and x = -1 that's the kind of thing I'd ask my professor on a test though haha, I could just let you do all my math forever if you want. Your formatting is beautiful. That's actually great. Thanks. The restrictions, as we defined them, are any x values, at any point in the whole equation process, that make the denominator equal to 0. So it would be 1, -1, 2, and 0 from the original piece, as well as the 3 +/- root 17 all over 2 restrictions, which had me confused. I thought I factored wrong. It looks like I didn't. Thank you very much. Also thank you Manix. Edited November 7, 2012 by Macho Barbarian Darros Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 haha, I could just let you do all my math forever if you want. Your formatting is beautiful. That's actually great. Thanks. The restrictions, as we defined them, are any x values, at any point in the whole equation process, that make the denominator equal to 0. So it would be 1, -1, 2, and 0 from the original piece, as well as the 3 +/- root 17 all over 2 restrictions, which had me confused. I thought I factored wrong. It looks like I didn't. Thank you very much. Also thank you Manix. anytime, dude. I enjoy doing math, and algebra shit like this is good practice to keep me limber for calc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nflchamp Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Restrictions for the initial problem are 2, 0, -1, and 1. You get undefineds in the numerator of the overall equation if you put in 2 or 0. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.