Tryhard Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 (edited) Y'all silly I think it was rather obvious that it wouldn't have as many characters as the latest Dynasty Warriors games. 15 is a little low, but what can you do? Edited August 14, 2014 by Tryhard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anacybele Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 I was hoping for hidden characters that weren't revealed (like the characters I wanted for instance). :( But oh well, it looks like an amazing game anyway and I can't wait to try Ghirahim. ^^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 Its the only disappointment with the game honestly is its small roster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roivann Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 Warriors Orochi 3 Hyper was the last Warriors game I played. That has somewhere around 130+ characters. Get on my level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soledai Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 (edited) My most recent was Warriors Orochi 3 Ultimate... Some of you guys are bummed about the roster size? The first Samurai Warriors game had 15 as well... But this game makes up for a small roster with different weapons for each character so I say, it's almost a fair trade. And it's the first HW game, so they have to be a little cautious about it, I'd say. Edited August 14, 2014 by Soledai Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silent Letters Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 "Disappointed" is a strong word, I suppose. I wouldn't even consider the small roster a bad thing, considering that the characters have different movesets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasori Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 (edited) I'm still not entirely sure if i'll go for the scarf. Its awesome of course, but its also 79 euro and my wallet thinks that is less awesome. A little dissapointed about the amount of characters and the fact that only a few characters get second movesets, but its not a huge deal to me. The characters we did get where awesome and Koei will support the game for a good while longer. Edited August 15, 2014 by Sasori Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWill Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 Future updates for the game has been confirmed, so people are still hoping for Groose/Cia/etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soledai Posted August 16, 2014 Share Posted August 16, 2014 I'm not surprised, KT is becoming rather engrossed in DLC, if that's what you meant. Character DLC is certainly a possibility, they've done it with DoA, so there's the possibility, though I would prefer stages and weapons(somewhat) as DLC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anacybele Posted August 16, 2014 Share Posted August 16, 2014 I would normally prefer weapons, locations, etc. as stages, but iIf character DLC means Groose, Pipit, and Ashei, then hell yeah I'll take it! ^^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight Posted August 16, 2014 Share Posted August 16, 2014 I'm actually quite disappointed with that roster size, especially since characters like Agatha and Fi are taking the place of characters like Groose, Skull Kid, Ravio, or the potential joke character of Error. I kind of felt this would be like the ultimate Zelda game crossover of all the games, but it's really only the most popular three, TP, SS and OoT, with a couple of nods to the next most popular, MM and WW. Games like Zelda 2, Awakening, Phantom/Spirit, or even Link to the Past don't get any representation as far as I know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solrocknroll Posted August 16, 2014 Share Posted August 16, 2014 I doubt we're getting any DLC for characters other than Cia, Valga, and Wizro. [spoiler=Major story spoilers! Don't click if you want to go in spoiler free]Actually Cia might be a moveset for Lana. It's revealed that Cia and Lana were once the same person, and at the end, Lana becomes wielder of the Triforce of Power, like how Cia wields it throughout the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soledai Posted August 16, 2014 Share Posted August 16, 2014 In all honestly, I doubt KT would make their originals DLC, knowing KT, you've likely have to meet some requirement to unlock them... which usually is not hard at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NinjaMonkey Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 (edited) characters like Agatha and Fi are taking the place of characters like Groose, Skull Kid, Ravio, or the potential joke character of Error. I'm one hundred percent sure that Agatha is the joke character of this game. Games like Zelda 2, Awakening, Phantom/Spirit, or even Link to the Past don't get any representation as far as I know. Most of those don't have any memorable side characters or set pieces. Edited August 17, 2014 by NinjaMonkey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 (edited) Did you seriously just say that Link to the Past, Awakening and Zelda II weren't memorable? Awakening had you know the FIRST IMPLYED romance in the series. Marin you know? Link to the Past had quite a few NPCs not to mention Agrahim Zelda II had the amazing comedic possibility of Error. Not to mention the towns are all named after the future sages (or in timeline retrospect the previous sages) All of these work better then anything from Skyward Sword. Edited August 17, 2014 by JediSwordSaint Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solrocknroll Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Link's Awakening is my favorite 2D Zelda and second only to Twilight Princess to me (my top 5 is SS, WW, MM, LA, and TP), but it didn't have very amazing sets to draw from in comparison to the 3D ones. I mean, Koholint Village is the best choice. It had Marin as a character. That's about it. Don't like Zelda II and don't care about Link to the Past. However, you did NOT just put down Skyward Sword :(. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breezy Kanzaki Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 I dunno whenever I think about the DS games aside from my hatred of Phantom Hourglass I remember dudes like Linebeck and such. But that's just me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Most of those don't have any memorable side characters or set pieces. Apart from Error, there is Dark Link in Zelda 2. There's a few in Link to the Past, there's Linebeck in the DS games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anacybele Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 However, you did NOT just put down Skyward Sword :(. Just ignore the haters. We know Skyward Sword was an excellent game. ^^ It's still my favorite Zelda to this day too. And it revived my love for the series after it went a bit stale. Though it was mostly because I felt Mario was becoming a better series. Now I absolutely can't WAIT to get my hands on a new Zelda. lol And Hyrule Warriors is my most wanted game after Smash Bros. Wii U/3DS at the moment. :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NinjaMonkey Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 (edited) Did you seriously just say that Link to the Past, Awakening and Zelda II weren't memorable? I suggest you carefully re-read my post, as you clearly didn't do it the first time. Edited August 17, 2014 by NinjaMonkey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Book of Ereshkigal Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 (edited) Did you seriously just say that Link to the Past, Awakening and Zelda II weren't memorable? Most of those don't have any memorable side characters or set pieces. I don't think they did say that lol EDIT: Derp. Am late. Edited August 17, 2014 by L95 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anacybele Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 I have to agree with Ninjamonkey, by the way. The original two Zeldas and A Link to the Past don't really have any memorable characters or locations. Though I loved ALttP to bits. It's in my top five Zeldas. Link's Awakening does have Marin though, and The Minish Cap also has Ezlo and Vaati. So a couple of the 2D games DO have memorable characters. As for locations, I don't remember any from LA though I played through most of it. TMC has Veil Falls and Vaati's wind palace though. Those are the first two that come to mind anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Vaati, there's another character who should have got some representation. I guess they didn't want to make 3D models for 2D characters or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anacybele Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Vaati should've been in the game, I agree. He's the second most recurring villain in the series after Ganondorf. Yet one-shot villains got in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kon Posted August 18, 2014 Share Posted August 18, 2014 Well, has any of the portable Zeldas gotten a rep, or even an item? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.