Jump to content

Eltoshen

Member
  • Posts

    1,195
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Eltoshen

  1. A lot of the discussion recently got me thinking that Edelgard's ideology reminds me of Malcolm X in some aspects. Edelgard is from a more privileged position of power, but the main comparison I'd make is that both believed that no change would ever come about unless people fought back against the violence and discrimination they were experiencing.

    People are complacent and are more comfortable with what they know and fear change of any sort, even if it's against their best interests. You can just look at the current state of the world.

     

    Quote

    The other is a ruthless person who will respond violently when she is attacked but she never actually goes out and pre-emptively starts killing people. She was more than justified in her decision to execute people who tried to kill her, robbed her tomb and assaulted her students. 

    Uh...no she wasn't. Multiple students make remarks about her decision in every route. They were not even given a trial. That scene was literally there to show you that Rhea has a dark side, as cringy as that sounds (the face she makes, the creepy smile - read between the lines dude). Jeralt comments on this the moment you meet her. Like, you have got to be purposefully misunderstanding the source material to say something like this and mean it.

  2. 2 hours ago, Crysta said:

    Edelgard > Lelouch

    I WENT THERE.

    You don't need to say it twice. Anybody who isn't a misogynist would agree. 

     

    Oops, I went there.

     

    Also, people who act like the crest system would just go away, I'd really like to see some examples of this in history. The French Revolution ring a bell to anybody? How peaceful was that?

  3. On 9/16/2019 at 6:44 PM, Escape the Fate said:

    I don’t think are “canon” recruitments per se but I do find it interesting that there is no overlap of the lords’ “outside-house supports”:

    Edelgard: Lysithea/Hanneman/Manuela

    Dimitri: Raphael/Marianne/Catherine/Alois/Gilbert

    Claude: Petra/Annette/Ingrid/Shamir/Cyril

    Shamir does support Hubert and Dedue as well, but still I thought it was a nice touch if intentional.

    Hanneman and Manuela also stay with Edelgard if you don't recruit them, so I think this list makes a lot of sense as to some biases the creators had. Shamir is a mercenary at heart, so it makes sense that she'd join either of them depending on where Byleth goes.

    On 9/16/2019 at 2:24 PM, ck425 said:

    I've completed BE and almost finished GD, having recruited a lot more characters second time round. Certain characters seem to make far more sense being recruited than others. I'd like to compile a list of which characters make the most sense from a story point of view. Here are the ones I've found:

     

    Black Eagles:

    Lorenz - His family are pro-empire and he loves nobility. It makes sense for him to join the Empire and attempt to finish the war asap to save the peasantry from further suffering. Also his supports with Dorothea and Ferdinand are great.

    Blue Lions

    Petra - For the same reason as the Alliance. Another thought that occurs is she wouldn't trust Edel after her sneak attack.

    See, you lost me on your first reasoning. How is loving nobility a good reason for joining the Empire? Edelgard especially detests incompetent nobles and believes the world should be run by the people who are most qualified for the job, regardless of their social status. I'd definitely say it's just a family reason.

    Also regarding Petra's reasoning, she specifically remarks about loving surprise attacks multiple times throughout the game (as it is akin to hunting), so even if she were to join the other houses, I doubt that'd be her reasoning.

  4. Falcoknight Dorothea and Marianne running around with a Levin Sword and Magic Lance (separate runthroughs).

    Great Knight Lindhardt - Gets doubled by absolutely everything but doesn't take damage from any enemy without a Silver weapon.

    Dark/Holy Knight Ferdinand

    Dancer Felix

    Gremory Edelgard, Bernadetta and Ingrid, all 3 of them are great, Ingrid and Bernadetta both have Physic and Edelgard is an absolute monster (Hades, Luna and Seraphim aren't even necessary, but great boss killers).

    I see no point doing the same old builds past your 2nd or 3rd run through. Sounds absolutely boring.

  5. 11 hours ago, Julian Solo said:

    Only in GD where Dimitri is completely incoherent for no consistent reason. Yeah but Edelgards own mental insanity is shockingly over looked. She starts a world war without enough resources to finish it. Causing it to be prolonged for five years. Claude and Dimitri both find her completely extreme. Only is CF Rhea considered more, so it's why Claude sides with Rhea and Dimitri over her in every other route. 

    He's a fucking mess for the majority of his own route. This is well established by the man himself. Literally only comes back to his senses when Dedue comes back.

  6. 16 hours ago, Julian Solo said:

    Where outside of CF is Rhea presented as a lunatic? She's mental scared for sure but she never harmed anyone who didn't try to kill her? Creepy and being insane are not the same. In fact she's far more reasonable then they present Edelgard. Who refuses to talk to anyone else or accept comprises of anyone but the empire controlling the continent. Like I love Edelgard as a character but she is presented as extreme as hell compared to anyone else in the story.

    Bro, both of them are and were more sane than Dimitri for a majority of the game, so let's just leave it at that.

  7. 12 hours ago, redlight said:

    What part is saying having martial prowess meant to insinuate him being a noob? That's a compliment

    In that case then yes. Anyone with talent in one field can be a teacher. However the game tries to come off as Byleth despite having expertise in one or two fields of knowledge, can teach people things he probably needs to study himself. Of course Byleth's proficiencies do play a role in how well you teach, but there really isn't anything stopping him from teaching about riding pegasi or wyverns.

    Also. Regarding Jeritza

      Reveal hidden contents

    He'd possibly be a good master of all teacher if him having the mastermind ability is anything to go by. Since it's Lysithea's personal ability and it's supposed to represent her being a prodigy it seems that Jeritza himself was a prodigy. He was probably hiding his true talents while he was undercover.

     

    I mean...Manuela and Hanneman aren't experts at combat. You can also do seminars during the weekend with various professors. Each house has their own homeroom professor/teacher but they received mentoring from all of them. It's ridiculous to expect 1 professor to be an expert at everything. That's literally not how anything past high school/college works.

    Besides, people like Hubert actually ask you 'What would you do if you are asked to teach something you're not an expert at?' or something to that affect and one option is 'I would study the topic myself before teaching' which is his preferential line of choice. This game does actually address what you're talking about.

    Many teachers who teach subjects they're not experts on do the exact same thing, studying the discussion topic beforehand either from their own research or through borrowing a colleague's notes or teaching material. In 3 Houses terms, that involves training Byleth's skills with the other professors during explorations and taking part in seminars.

  8. On 9/9/2019 at 3:41 PM, Wolfen09 said:

    I understand the game needs you to be a teacher, but seriously if we speak rationally, byleth would have been in the knights under jeralt, not a teacher.  It's not like byleth was leading the mercs, he was under jeralt.  Now the argument for student while justified, I don't think holds up as well as a knight does.  I mean until recruited, Cyril isn't even a student, so why should some nobody Merc be a student in the "prestigious" academy.

    Because Rhea is an authoritarian and makes the final decisions. That's a main part of the story.

  9. 2 hours ago, PrincessAlyson said:

    Agreed. In talks like these I see Rhea and Edelgard get flak for things that are similar. I don't think either of them have the moral high ground, but I do empathize with Rhea more because she's lost more: most of her species. She's desperate to return to happier days and honestly, can't blame her for that. I would've lost my mind if I came home to find my family and species dead and their bodies mutilated to make weapons of mass destruction.

    Edelgard lost all 10 of her siblings to crest experimentation also, so don't forget that. She describes watching them all die and yet she's still in touch with humanity. Given, Rhea's so fucking old it might make sense why she doesn't experience emotions the same way humans do but then that begs the question - should the supreme ruler of the Church that governs the entire continent be a person who is out of touch with the reality of human life and their emotions?

  10. On 8/17/2019 at 9:17 PM, eclipse said:

    Sometimes, the group task result will take an insanely long time to load.  I think it was the worst for me when I used a student that I recruited.

    This and a lot of other bugs in this thread sound just like loading time issues but idk if they're actually bugs since it doesn't crash the game. I've experienced a few but it just seems like the assets took longer to appear and doesn't happen often.

  11. 3 hours ago, Flere210 said:

    What happen after Edelgard worthy successor dies? What happen in the future is not revealed to us. For example i doubt Fodlan can defend  itself againist Dagda and Almyra whitout relics, but this is never brought up in any ending. As it's not brougth up how they deal whit unfought supporters of the enemy like Caspar's father or the slithers main force(they are not aan hive mind controlled by Thales) in BL. We are just told GoLdEn AgE. I in fact think no ending should logically lead into a golden Age for a number of reasons.

    Well, if we're not going to take the endings for what they're worth, then they were just badly written. You have a point, but if you break it down, if you're operating under a system that focuses on merit rather than inheritance, then that's what you're used to...same goes the other way around. In Edelgard's ending, that change has already taken place. Meanwhile, a church state? No revolution actually occurred so you're still in the status quo where nobles are still in power and the people who inherit that power are other nobles. It's not fair to compare them on equal terms because the path to corruption would be far easier in a system where nobility is still awarded because the inherent privilege of being born to a higher class has never been abolished.

    However, I'd still choose Edelgard's world of merit > class over Rhea's Church and Nobility trumps all, which is what this topic was discussing anyways.

  12. 4 hours ago, Flere210 said:

    I don't think that the corrupt nobles will disappear. I think that they will keep doing their own thing, die of old age or something and get replaced by Sylvain,Ferdinand and so on, wich will not do the same things.

    Power corrupts. Even if we pretend like Ferdinand and Sylvain are perfect angels, what happens after they die? What prevents the corrupt nobles from rising to power again? The status quo won't change if there is no forced incentive for them to do so.

  13. 50 minutes ago, Flere210 said:

    Rha is the reason we cannot change stuff. But Rhea also happen to have a clear objective: revive mommy.

    If mommy get revived she will go away. And mommy get revived in any route because for her SSJ Byleth is good enought.

    In a different time Rhea may have been a wall that can only be removed whit violence, but we are in that one moment when she can step down peacefully. Edelgard did not know that, but the tools to find that out were aviable to her, she just did not use them.

    Regardless of the fact that I disagree with you when you said Rhea was just going to step aside, nobody knew what Rhea's objective was because she confided in nobody. You expect the students like Edelgard and Claude to know that she was just going to step aside once she resurrected her mother when nobody knew about their relationship? She lied about the entire history of Fodlan. Claude questioned her multiple times in his route and she only spilled the beans after it was clear that she was literally about to die so she had nothing to lose.

    Looking at things in hindsight isn't a good way to make an argument regarding these characters. Edelgard had a just purpose (to abolish the injustice of the class system and censorship by the Church) with questionable actions. Rhea's sole purpose was a selfish desire to resurrect her mother to govern all of Fodlan. She literally admits this.

    People acting like change comes about without opposition haven't studied enough history. There is no such thing as peaceful change. Did Edelgard go overboard with some of her actions? No doubt. However, anybody who pretends like the nobility system was just going to disappear once Byleth became archbishop are fooling themselves. There is no indication in Claude or Dimitri's route that the nobility and Crest system was abolished.

  14. On 9/10/2019 at 6:07 AM, Julian Solo said:

    Byleth, Dimitri and Cluade do get her to step down and chance her closed border policy on all routes she lives.

    None of them would have even had the opportunity to do so if edelgard didn't start a war to free the continent from the Church's rule. Also, they don't get her to step down. All I remember from the ending is that Rhea is too weak to govern any longer and she chooses to step aside. Doesn't change the fact that the Church still holds power.

  15. Quote

    Judging by her actions in all 4 routes, she seems driven to start the war over her own personal grudge with Crests than like actually for the betterment of society.

    I disagree with this statement. Just because she has a grievance with Crests doesn't mean that she isn't fighting the crest system for a reason. 

    But fairly noted that she didn't come out with the truth from the start. Another situation where she's very similar to Rhea. I also just remembered that Edelgard had 10 siblings, 8 older and 2 younger who died due to experimentation with Crests (both of them had their families torn apart).

    However, I'm pretty sure Edelgard knew from the start that there was no way she was going to be able to get Rhea to just step down and reveal the truth about the Crest system willingly when she's aware of how long Rhea's been in power. We have to remember that Edelgard has the most knowledge about the Church when it comes to the 3 different lords, thanks to Tomas and TWSID, albeit some of it tainted.

    So if you're going to argue that fighting violence with violence is the answer. Why not fight deception with deception? What right does Rhea have to get mad?

    Also, in the Ashe/Catherine paralogue, she explicitly is going there to pass judgment, so to not expect the Western Church to respond in kind would make no sense.

  16. Rhea has done some questionable shit, and if you play Edelgard's route, this is highlighted even further prior to the start of the final chapter.

    Rhea's loyalty is...

    Her mother >>>>>>>>> Byleth (unless...you know) > Flayn and Seteth >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everybody else > Church dissidents

    It's hard to argue that Edelgard took the morally justifiable route by starting a war with an entire continent, but you can see the reasoning behind her actions. Hers seems to more on a grander scale for the betterment of society while Rhea's is purely for selfish reasons.

    I can understand why Rhea became the way she did, but I personally don't agree with her methods. Censoring the truth and executing anybody who dares question the Church is just barbaric.

    I see people here making arguments that she did well to promote peace, and I can agree that she has done some amazing things for people worthy of respect, but her primary concern is the resurrection of her mother -- to the point where nothing else matters in the face of a possible reunion with her creator. Catherine and Cyril remark on this plenty of times throughout the game, admitting that Rhea really only cares about Byleth and not them.

    Quote

    As she just replaces the church she hates with a puppet one under the empires control. She litterally replaces the church that she claimed manipulates people with one that only exists to manipulate people.  She's a great character but to say her actions are morally more justified then Rheas to me is laughable.

    In her own ending, she steps down from her throne and a suitable ruler takes her place. There's also a difference between a ruling power who doesn't hide the truth and one that purposefully lies to the people to keep peace. Which one you would rather live under is up to the individual. Let's not forget that a huge plot point in this game revolves around the injustice of nobility and the crest system. We learn Rhea is not responsible for the creation of the Crests, but she does take advantage of their existence to maintain power. This, in turn, upholds a world where those without crests or nobility would be seen as lesser than. Obviously, there may be a potential path to corruption in Edelgard's new Adrestian ruled continent, but we don't really have many details to go off of regarding how her new system even works.

  17. 20 hours ago, Naoko_Akamori said:

    I think the flower one is a quest item you pick up in the Greenhouse - it's not an actual flower. The material ones are actually listed on the quest, in a way that they kind of look like quest 'rewards.' It's a little confusing. All you get for the supply runs is money. 

    You get renown too, actually, which is what most people do that quest for.

  18. 2 hours ago, timon said:

    Then why is no one talking about Manuela, she is a LOT more inappropriate than a bellybutton window and some weirdly designed stockings.

    Also I'm more talking about their "head+face", male has god awful hair (actually the worst haircut in the game Lorenz aside) and a terrible expression, while she's overwhelmingly cute.

    Lorenz post time skip has the most glorious hair.

  19. Who cares? It's not something that will change the story drastically if you were originally a TA .

     

    You're meant to be more experienced in battle than the students, growing up as a mercenary. You also are known as the Ashen Demon (though that is hardly brought up) due to your skill on the field. It's pretty much established from the beginning that you're a skilled combatant and were taught by the best knight in Seiros history. You're even acknowledged by Felix (who is pretty much the most skilled student in terms of actual combat skills).

×
×
  • Create New...