Jump to content

General Banzai

Member
  • Posts

    2,195
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by General Banzai

  1. Personally I'd say there's three eras: Kaga (1 through 5), Post-Kaga (6 through 10), and Post-Post-Kaga (11 through 14). I would actually say there was an even larger pivot in terms of gameplay and story philosophy between Radiance Saga and Awakening than between Thracia and 6.

    No era has a consistent strength or weakness--FE4 has basically garbage story, characters, and gameplay, but Thracia has a pretty decent story and the best gameplay in the series. Post-Kaga plots range from the best in the series with 8 and 9 to confused messes in 7 and 10. I don't even think it's a matter of ambition or risk taking--FERD was far more ambitious and risky than FE4, for instance. Post-Kaga gameplay tends to be pretty uninspired. Meanwhile, Post-Post-Kaga (or rather, Post-2007-companywide-Intsys-failure) sees a pivot toward absolutely no story emphasis (which was also seen in pretty much all of Intsys's properties post-2007) but with a lot of advancements and experiments in gameplay that keep the games pretty refreshing.

  2. But some of your criticism apply to every Video Game ever made, like why doesn't Nergal send his most powerful generals to get Nils and Ninian, which the answer to is because it is a Video Game.

    In Chapter 3 of Sacred Stones, Vigarde assigns Glen and Valter to capture Eirika and Ephraim.

  3. Would it be an unpopular opinion that I really don't get the amount of criticism the story of 7 gets? Its a competent escalation of events from fighting bandits to corrupt nobles, an assassin guild all the way to the evil sorcerer pulling the strings. That and the smaller, more personal scale does make it stand out among the other stories.

    The world building is definitely up to snuff thanks to the focus on only three countries. As a result all three are reasonably fleshed out.

    You gotta read my QUINTESSENCE? DON'T UNDERSTAND thread

    I claim credit for singlehandedly changing people's views on FE7's story, yes that was me I did it

  4. I don't think Eliwood is much better than Roy really, he has the same problem of mediocre bases (doesn't double, gets 2-3HKOd, 2-3HKOs back, 1 range locked). Roy's game just has harder enemies.

    I mean, how a good a unit is is defined by their enemies. Otherwise FERD characters would all be the best in the series, but they just have stronger enemies to deal with.

  5. Denning is like the original Fire Emblem meme. He's a meme inside the context of the game, repeatedly vapidly until the original context has no further meaning. He's coincidentally the best character in FE7.

    Gheb was pretty memeful back in the old days. GhebFE is basically MemeFE, after all.

    3-13 Archer

    Glass, Batta the Beast

×
×
  • Create New...