Ercdouken Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Here's how he got banned http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QreNQDh2N1s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanz Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Ok...that was amusing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not Changed by VASM :( Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 I love you man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zephrion Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 At first I thought it would be something really retarded, but that was amazing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEnd Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Sounds about true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
California Mountain Snake Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Dumbass reason to get banned. c wut i did thar? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkhead Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Wow, the way one minimal word changed his condition, LOL, I love that anime part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
California Mountain Snake Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 But seriously, if that's what he got banned over I'm pretty fucking pissed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEnd Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 But seriously, if that's what he got banned over I'm pretty fucking pissed. As said in the other thread: warn level. He got warned for that, and hit 100%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canas is back Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 and got banned Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufasa Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Strange. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Tarrasque Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 What's strange? >_> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lolDeath Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 That was beautiful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rei Rei Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Sounds about true. I BANNED HIM HAHAHAHAHAHA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
California Mountain Snake Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 As said in the other thread: warn level.He got warned for that, and hit 100%. The rules say "100% Warn Level is grounds for banishment, however only if the majority of the administrators, and half of the mods agree." IE, you won't get banned at 100% unless the mods feel it's warrented. The fact that half of the mods and admins felt like banning a 14 year old who was a pretty neutral troll kind of makes them look like douches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jyosua Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 The rules say "100% Warn Level is grounds for banishment, however only if the majority of the administrators, and half of the mods agree." IE, you won't get banned at 100% unless the mods feel it's warrented. The fact that half of the mods and admins felt like banning a 14 year old who was a pretty neutral troll kind of makes them look like douches. Well apparently someone hasn't read the new rules. 8D We let him reach 100% out of kindness. We could have banned him at 90%, and I almost did, but I decided, nah, let's see if he can last 2 weeks without a warn. If so, we'll cut him some slack. But he didn't. Secondly *warranted Thirdly, you call us douches again, and you'll be the one receiving warns. 8) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florete Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 (edited) The rules say "100% Warn Level is grounds for banishment, however only if the majority of the administrators, and half of the mods agree." IE, you won't get banned at 100% unless the mods feel it's warrented. The fact that half of the mods and admins felt like banning a 14 year old who was a pretty neutral troll kind of makes them look like douches. Obviously you haven't seen the new rules. Being suspended multiple times is grounds for consideration to be banned. Especially if your total suspensions add up to more than 2 weeks. He could've been banned long ago. EDIT: Damn, Jyo beat me. Edited March 9, 2009 by Red Fox of Fire Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodykitty Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 I think the ban is warranted considering he was flaming someone that actually didn't deserve to be flamed or do anything to attract flames. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Der Kommissar Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just call me AL Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 I know I probably shouldn't, but... *snickers* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
California Mountain Snake Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Thirdly, you call us douches again, and you'll be the one receiving warns. 8) Oh? Is that so, Herr Jyo? Secondly *warranted You, of all people, are going to correct my spelling? I guess I don't even have to say at this point what this makes you. It begins with "d" if I'm stretching your mental capacities It's "a douche" if you need another hint There are many more members on this site that have expressed much more blatant attacks on other members with little more than a suspension. DHero never made any blatant or malicious flames, he just accumulated a lot of dumb comments, stupid retorts, and things I was definitely guilty of when I was 14 and posted on forum websites. But the fact remains you can't go to federal prison for 20 misdemeanors, and banning a member for saying stupid things would require half of the forum to be banned (including several members of the administration). The fact is that vitriolic attacks have been levied against senior members with little more than a suspension. DHero never did anything worthy of that. This sentence doesn't fit the crime, and I have again lost respect for the administration of this site. Again. Quit stealin' my thunder boh-ay! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Quit stealin' my thunder boh-ay! You mean my thunder. Never forget. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
California Mountain Snake Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 You mean my thunder. Never forget. ...! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florete Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Black Knight obviously wasn't around much when DHero joined. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
California Mountain Snake Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Black Knight obviously wasn't around much when DHero joined. If y'all are going to hold past actions against him, then he should have been banned then. Holding things inside like this is a fucking chickenshit thing to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.