AstraLunaSol Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Yeah, she's evil. >_> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriemhild Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 (edited) Nonsense! She's always so bright and cheerful. Who's mad at you? Edited February 17, 2010 by Proto Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amelia Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Haiz. Whatever. Uhm... Who would that be now~? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mousefire Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Is amelia still here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkhead Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Nope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstraLunaSol Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 lolololol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mousefire Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 aw, man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkhead Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Hehehaha...of course she's here. Why do you have Oz? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstraLunaSol Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Joke I bet. lolololololol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amelia Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 I'm here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriemhild Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 For a moment, I was like "When did I post that and why did I say "amelia" instead of 'Amelia!'???" Then I saw the username Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griulf Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Something I missed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashGordon94 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Hey peoplez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BK-201 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Hi, next time Iced is on and I'm not tell him "fuck you" for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkhead Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Okay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BK-201 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Furret, - + - = -, only in multiplying is it positive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parrhesia Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Yeah. I'm bad at maths when it's about five thirty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BK-201 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 I'm not. Math is an enjoyable subject. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkhead Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Did you read my comment!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BK-201 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 The okay? I IS CONFUSED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkhead Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Okay I meant my latest one in your profile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BK-201 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Yes, it convinced me that shooting Iced is the way to go. As if negatives stack on through addition with each other shooting him should results in times 0 making the result neutral. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parrhesia Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 (edited) Now that I think about it, think Iced was referring to double negatives. Through maths. We had the dumbest introduction to double negatives; teacher put on 'Another brick in the wall' (whatever the title actually is) and then instructed us firmly that yes, we didn't need no education. Edited February 17, 2010 by The Ferret Whisperer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BK-201 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Now that I think about it, think Iced was referring to double negatives. We had the dumbest introduction to double negatives; teacher put on 'Another brick in the wall' (whatever the title actually is) and then instructed us firmly that yes, we didn't need no education. No, he was saying that both - + - and - * - = +. And here he is calling me idiot. I'm two years younger.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BK-201 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Now that I think about it, think Iced was referring to double negatives. Through maths. We had the dumbest introduction to double negatives; teacher put on 'Another brick in the wall' (whatever the title actually is) and then instructed us firmly that yes, we didn't need no education. Also the words "we didn't need no education" means you did need education as you don't need 0 of something so you need an amount >0. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.