PostPavilion Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 http://www.playfire.com/win-codmw2/313539313330 Answers: Infinity Ward PS3, Xbox 360 and PC November 10th 2009 fourzerotwo Dual-wield handguns Modern Warfare 2: Ghost False - it's one iteration on Square Enix Task Force 141 Sargeant Gary "Roach" Sanderson I don't think this is illegal on boards..I dunno. >_> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodykitty Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 No thanks. No game that wants to destroy what PC gaming stands for is worth getting for free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candlejack Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 (edited) I'd play it. IF, and only IF Treyarch paid me to play it. It looks like CoD4.5 Coming from a guy who isn't quite sure whether or not he likes L4D2. EDIT: Disregard that. Nick + Machete/Magnum + Combat Rifle = good times. Edited November 4, 2009 by OliverXRenning Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PostPavilion Posted November 4, 2009 Author Share Posted November 4, 2009 Personally I'm not a fan of CoD either...but free game. Sell it for money >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix Wright Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Yes! I'm trying to win. CoD is fun as hell to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hero Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 Shame there are so few realistic shooting games these days, Call of Duty has really lowered the bar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candlejack Posted November 7, 2009 Share Posted November 7, 2009 If war ran like CoD, we'd have nukes falling everywhere. Because people get a LOT more than 25 kills. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanger Posted November 7, 2009 Share Posted November 7, 2009 totally going to to get this game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix Wright Posted November 7, 2009 Share Posted November 7, 2009 If war ran like CoD, we'd have nukes falling everywhere. Because people get a LOT more than 25 kills. Not really. Realistically, ground soldiers don't kill THAT many people. A Marine I know (my old Spanish teacher) only killed thirty-three people. Yeah, that's a handful for one guy, but it's not like these people are killing HUNDREDS. The air force and navy can sometimes kill at least one-hundred, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candlejack Posted November 7, 2009 Share Posted November 7, 2009 If war ran like CoD, we'd have nukes falling everywhere. Because people get a LOT more than 25 kills. The air force and navy can sometimes kill at least one-hundred, though. Yeah, that's what I was aiming for. Each individual soldier probably gets one nuke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix Wright Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 Too bad the vid got taken down, I wanted to see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 Leaving this here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candlejack Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 (edited) And once again Activision treats the PC market like a bitch. If anyone needs me, I'll be in the corner scorning humanity. EDIT: For our slightly less intelligent viewers, that was a joke. Edited November 8, 2009 by OliverXRenning Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zkirsche Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 No Thanks, I'm happy with Cod 5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hero Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 If war ran like CoD, we'd have nukes falling everywhere. Because people get a LOT more than 25 kills. Not really. Realistically, ground soldiers don't kill THAT many people. A Marine I know (my old Spanish teacher) only killed thirty-three people. Yeah, that's a handful for one guy, but it's not like these people are killing HUNDREDS. The air force and navy can sometimes kill at least one-hundred, though. "Only" thirty-three? That's the kind of number expert sharpshooters hit over years of high-intensity deployments, unless they're involved in civilian or prisoner massacres or something. Some air force pilots will kill hundreds of people, as will artillery guys who launch missiles at urban areas, but that's only because most armies, including the US military, don't put too much weight on how much collateral damage they cause in air attacks so long as there are legitimate targets hidden underneath, but that's a different debate. Firefights are only a small part of soldiering and never happen these days if everything goes according to plan. I have a friend who went through three years of service as a combat soldier in the Israeli Defense Force, maybe the most professional military on earth, including in the recent Operation Cast Lead in Gaza last year, who carried around a loaded assault rifle for the whole time and never got into a firefight, simply because his unit never had the bad luck of being attacked by an armed enemy. There's no way games like Call of Duty are games about war and soldiering. If real life were like Call of Duty the world would be depopulated pretty quickly. They're games about shooting. Since they claim to be almost simulations, and are often cited as such, the least they could do is make the shooting more realistic, with accurate weapon specs rather than stereotypical or just plain made-up ones, with characters that aren't gods who can withstand a bullet through a lung without even slowing down, stuff like that. In CoD4 there are some weapons that are actually different weapons from the names given, that's bullshit for a game claiming to be about realistic modern warfare. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 If war ran like CoD, we'd have nukes falling everywhere. Because people get a LOT more than 25 kills. Not really. Realistically, ground soldiers don't kill THAT many people. A Marine I know (my old Spanish teacher) only killed thirty-three people. Yeah, that's a handful for one guy, but it's not like these people are killing HUNDREDS. The air force and navy can sometimes kill at least one-hundred, though. "Only" thirty-three? That's the kind of number expert sharpshooters hit over years of high-intensity deployments, unless they're involved in civilian or prisoner massacres or something. Some air force pilots will kill hundreds of people, as will artillery guys who launch missiles at urban areas, but that's only because most armies, including the US military, don't put too much weight on how much collateral damage they cause in air attacks so long as there are legitimate targets hidden underneath, but that's a different debate. Firefights are only a small part of soldiering and never happen these days if everything goes according to plan. I have a friend who went through three years of service as a combat soldier in the Israeli Defense Force, maybe the most professional military on earth, including in the recent Operation Cast Lead in Gaza last year, who carried around a loaded assault rifle for the whole time and never got into a firefight, simply because his unit never had the bad luck of being attacked by an armed enemy. There's no way games like Call of Duty are games about war and soldiering. If real life were like Call of Duty the world would be depopulated pretty quickly. They're games about shooting. Since they claim to be almost simulations, and are often cited as such, the least they could do is make the shooting more realistic, with accurate weapon specs rather than stereotypical or just plain made-up ones, with characters that aren't gods who can withstand a bullet through a lung without even slowing down, stuff like that. In CoD4 there are some weapons that are actually different weapons from the names given, that's bullshit for a game claiming to be about realistic modern warfare. Shh, you're making them feel less hardcore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix Wright Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 If war ran like CoD, we'd have nukes falling everywhere. Because people get a LOT more than 25 kills. Not really. Realistically, ground soldiers don't kill THAT many people. A Marine I know (my old Spanish teacher) only killed thirty-three people. Yeah, that's a handful for one guy, but it's not like these people are killing HUNDREDS. The air force and navy can sometimes kill at least one-hundred, though. "Only" thirty-three? That's the kind of number expert sharpshooters hit over years of high-intensity deployments, unless they're involved in civilian or prisoner massacres or something. Some air force pilots will kill hundreds of people, as will artillery guys who launch missiles at urban areas, but that's only because most armies, including the US military, don't put too much weight on how much collateral damage they cause in air attacks so long as there are legitimate targets hidden underneath, but that's a different debate. Firefights are only a small part of soldiering and never happen these days if everything goes according to plan. I have a friend who went through three years of service as a combat soldier in the Israeli Defense Force, maybe the most professional military on earth, including in the recent Operation Cast Lead in Gaza last year, who carried around a loaded assault rifle for the whole time and never got into a firefight, simply because his unit never had the bad luck of being attacked by an armed enemy. There's no way games like Call of Duty are games about war and soldiering. If real life were like Call of Duty the world would be depopulated pretty quickly. They're games about shooting. Since they claim to be almost simulations, and are often cited as such, the least they could do is make the shooting more realistic, with accurate weapon specs rather than stereotypical or just plain made-up ones, with characters that aren't gods who can withstand a bullet through a lung without even slowing down, stuff like that. In CoD4 there are some weapons that are actually different weapons from the names given, that's bullshit for a game claiming to be about realistic modern warfare. "Only" was in the context of CoD, not in the life of a real soldier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.