Jump to content

A topic for gentlemen


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I HAVE CHANGED MY MIND UPON FURTHER INTROSPECTION IT HAS OCCURRED TO ME THAT STOLY IS NOT THE MOST UNGENTLEMANLY OF FIGURES BUT RATHER A DUPLICITOUS SORT OF RABBLE ROUSER KNOWN BY THE MONIKER EIN

HENCEFORTH SAID INDIVIDUAL IS BANNED FROM SUCH GENTLEMANLY ESTABLISHMENTS AS THIS TOPIC AND ALSO I HOPE HE DIES

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I HAVE CHANGED MY MIND UPON FURTHER INTROSPECTION IT HAS OCCURRED TO ME THAT STOLY IS NOT THE MOST UNGENTLEMANLY OF FIGURES BUT RATHER A DUPLICITOUS SORT OF RABBLE ROUSER KNOWN BY THE MONIKER EIN

HENCEFORTH SAID INDIVIDUAL IS BANNED FROM SUCH GENTLEMANLY ESTABLISHMENTS AS THIS TOPIC AND ALSO I HOPE HE DIES

Bring it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TRULY THE MOST UNCHIVALROUS MALE THAT HAS EVER EXISTED POSTING IN AN AREA HE HAS BEEN BANNED FROM WHAT A DISTURBING AND VERITABLY UNCOUTH PILLAR OF FILTH THIS FIGURE IS

Why is that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NO STOLYS ALLOWED UNGENTLEMANLY COOTIES NOT NEEDED HERE SIR AND/OR MADAM

I HAVE CHANGED MY MIND UPON FURTHER INTROSPECTION IT HAS OCCURRED TO ME THAT STOLY IS NOT THE MOST UNGENTLEMANLY OF FIGURES BUT RATHER A DUPLICITOUS SORT OF RABBLE ROUSER KNOWN BY THE MONIKER EIN

HENCEFORTH SAID INDIVIDUAL IS BANNED FROM SUCH GENTLEMANLY ESTABLISHMENTS AS THIS TOPIC AND ALSO I HOPE HE DIES

TRULY THE MOST UNCHIVALROUS MALE THAT HAS EVER EXISTED POSTING IN AN AREA HE HAS BEEN BANNED FROM WHAT A DISTURBING AND VERITABLY UNCOUTH PILLAR OF FILTH THIS FIGURE IS

http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=6639072

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to second this.

And on that note, good morning, my good sirs. Would it be a terrible imposition if a lady joined this discussion? I stress "lady" and not "woman." I should think my monocle and top hat mute testimony to my most genteel of pedigrees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to second this.

And on that note, good morning, my good sirs. Would it be a terrible imposition if a lady joined this discussion? I stress "lady" and not "woman." I should think my monocle and top hat

Now I know where the mustache that I could never grow went. ;~;

I vote to let her in so long as she gives us any mustaches that she shaves off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to second this.

And on that note, good morning, my good sirs. Would it be a terrible imposition if a lady joined this discussion? I stress "lady" and not "woman." I should think my monocle and top hat mute testimony to my most genteel of pedigrees.

Your testimony is accepted for correctly spelling "stationery."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...