Florete Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Oh ok...-40k is not a fatal blow. And there's nothing stopping you from using two snipers (Rebecca and Louise), especially when Louise comes with that A with Pent making him that much better. and is also essentially +10k due to being already promoted. fix'd It's 50k, and it's a pretty darn huge blow. Rebecca and Wil are both assumed to be played, so Louise is likely to not be played on account of her being an addition that isn't contributing except maybe a support with Pent, which isn't good enough on its own to get her played. One Sniper is all anyone really needs, so three is overkill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canas is back Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 It's 50k, and it's a pretty darn huge blow.Rebecca and Wil are both assumed to be played, so Louise is likely to not be played on account of her being an addition that isn't contributing except maybe a support with Pent, which isn't good enough on its own to get her played. One Sniper is all anyone really needs, so three is overkill. also, it takes a slot away from a better character, and kills tactics or exp,besides bows are expensive themselves so BOWS+ 50 K PROMOTION=FAILED FUNDS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reikken Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 It's 50k, and it's a pretty darn huge blow. Everyone else uses 10k. 50k is only 40k over that, so it's 40k. Rebecca and Wil are both assumed to be played, Of course, since you can't evaluate a character that doesn't exist, but they don't need to both be fielded at once. That makes no sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florete Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 (edited) Let's see what I can pull out... Supports - They're getting each other. Here's why. Wil's other supports: Dart - Not played in ranks Lyn - Wants Florina or Kent more. Plus, Rebecca's evade > Lyn's Critical evade. Plus, Rebecca is faster. Rath - Not likely to be played on account of being another bow user Wallace - Not likely to be recruited at all, much less played Raven - Takes too long to be worth it Wil wants Rebecca Rebecca's other supports: Dart - Not played in ranks Louise - Not likely to be played on account of being another bow user Nino - Comes too late to make use of supports Lowen - A possible alternative, though rather long Sain - Also possible, though not as good as Lowen. Longer, and Lowen's evade>Sain's crit evade Raven - Possible, but not as good as Lowen for her. Also long. Rebecca wants Wil the most, though possibly Lowen. They are likely to be around the same level when they meet, though Rebecca is notably harder to raise. Level 8 sounds like a fair level. Rebecca: HP: 21.2 Str: 6.8 Skill: 8.5 Spd: 10.2 Luck: 7.5 Def: 4.05 Res: 3.1 Wil: HP: 24.5 Str: 9 Sk: 8 Sp: 7.4 Lk: 8.4 Df: 6.2 Rs: 1.5 Wil wins in: HP, Str, luck, Def. Rebecca wins in: Skill, Sp, Res. Who is better here is arguable. They shouldn't be attacked head on, so the HP, Def, and Res don't matter too much. Thus, Wil does more damage and Rebecca is doubling more and (barely) hitting more. However, if Rebecca is paired with Lowen, she may easily have a C-support by now, closing the gap in power and further boosting her in hitting, dodging, and critting. No clear winner here. Let's advance to promotion. On account of the second Orion's Bolt appearing on Four-Fanged Offense, they can easily be promoted together. Rebecca lv 1 Sniper HP: 32.4 St: 14.6 Sk: 15.5 Sp: 18.4 Lk: 13.5 Df: 7.85 Rs: 8.7 Wil lv 1 Sniper HP: 36.5 St: 16 Sk: 16 Sp: 14.2 Lk: 13.2 Df: 10.6 Rs: 7.5 Wil wins in: HP, st, sk, def. Rebecca wins in: Sp, luck, res The differences in st, sk, luck, and res are so small they're hardly noticeable. Thus, Wil has better durability in HP and def while Rebecca is faster. Since they shouldn't be attacked up close, I'd say Rebecca has a bit of an advantage here. They're likely supporting each other, so... yeah. As for B supports... Rebecca likely has Lowen, helping her close the minor gaps in str and hit and boosting her avoid and crit. Wil likely has Lyn, which re-opens the minor gaps in str and hit, yet not helping him avoid anything. This is faster than Rebecca's Lowen B, but doesn't start until later, so that evens things out again. Another problem is that when Lyn hits 20, she isn't being deployed until promotion unless a bonus slot is available, which doesn't come much. Finally, endgame stats. lv 15 sounds fair: Rebecca: HP: 40.8 St: 20.2 Sk 22.5 Sp: 26.8 Lk: 20.5 Df: 9.95 Rs: 12.9 Wil: Hp: 47 st: 23 sk: 23 sp: 19.8 lk: 18.8 df: 13.4 rs: 11 Wil wins in: HP, st, sk, def. Rebecca wins in: Sp, luck, res Differences are more noticeable. .5 Skill difference is really nothing. 7 speed is something, but enemies are slow, so Wil is still likely to double a good deal of the time. Wil still has the durability and Rebecca still has the dodging. Neither really matters much since they aren't likely to be attacked, but given the possibility, I'd say Rebecca is more likely to live on account of dodging more often. Supports are the same, minus Lyn not being deployed. It almost comes down to personal preference. The speedy dodger, or the heavier hitter? Do you mind a bit of a challenge earlier? My vote is on the speedy dodger, as her joining conditions are obsolete to me. Edited October 7, 2008 by Fox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_____ Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Lowen wants Marcus A/Eliwood B or Eliwood A/Marcus B more than Rebecca B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doom103 Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Wil is a cooler character, but Rebbecca has better stats so I use Wil, but my Wil turned out very good on my second play through Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
¬_¬ Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 I'd only use Wil if I were to overuse him all of Lyn's mode, but I prefer using the Cavaliers and Erk. Rebecca > Wil in my book, coming from the guy who used his name. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florete Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Lowen wants Marcus A/Eliwood B or Eliwood A/Marcus B more than Rebecca B. I can't see how anyone would want Marcus. He's not a great character later, so it would essentially be a wasted support. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swordsalmon Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 I can't see how anyone would want Marcus. He's not a great character later, so it would essentially be a wasted support. Because he's incredible at start and still is pretty good by late-game due to level advantage and supports. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tino Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Marcus is like a slightly worse Titania or Seth. He is massively, massively underrated and underestimated because of all those FAQs saying that he sucks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florete Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 In comparison to the other Paladins minus Isadora, he does suck... Aren't all three better than him upon promotion or possibly sooner? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swordsalmon Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 In comparison to the other Paladins minus Isadora, he does suck... Aren't all three better than him upon promotion or possibly sooner? None of them match Marcus in early-game, and he's cheaper to use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reikken Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 In comparison to the other Paladins minus Isadora, he does suck... Aren't all three better than him upon promotion or possibly sooner? Yes. It's just that he's INCREDIBLY AMAZING early on and stays decent enough later. His spd will be utter garbage later on, but fortunately for him, this game's average enemy AS is extremely low. Not that he can double everything or anything like that. But he can DA a fair amount. And he has decent str and has good durability thanks to his class and supports. I wouldn't use him after the early chapters, but doing so is not a bad idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_____ Posted October 8, 2008 Share Posted October 8, 2008 In comparison to the other Paladins minus Isadora, he does suck... Aren't all three better than him upon promotion or possibly sooner? The same could be said of Titania or Seth. They're both good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reikken Posted October 8, 2008 Share Posted October 8, 2008 It can't, actually. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tino Posted October 8, 2008 Share Posted October 8, 2008 When I'm talking about a "better" character, I'm talking about a character who helps you the most during game, and Marcus is almost a necessity earlygame. And he's not as bad lategame as most people say, so he is indeed better than the other Paladins. From the way I define "better", that is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florete Posted October 8, 2008 Share Posted October 8, 2008 The same could be said of Titania or Seth. They're both good. They both have good growths. Seth especially has arguably the best Paladin growths in the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_____ Posted October 8, 2008 Share Posted October 8, 2008 They both have good growths. Seth especially has arguably the best Paladin growths in the game. And yet the other Paladins surpass him and Titania, eventually. Marcus does not have terrible growths; he doesn't have the best growths ever, I admit, but he's useable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florete Posted October 8, 2008 Share Posted October 8, 2008 And yet the other Paladins surpass him and Titania, eventually. Marcus does not have terrible growths; he doesn't have the best growths ever, I admit, but he's useable. That's why I don't consider them to be truly awesome characters. But they are both better for their respective games than Marcus is for this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tino Posted October 8, 2008 Share Posted October 8, 2008 That's why I don't consider them to be truly awesome characters. But they are both better for their respective games than Marcus is for this one. That is definitely true. They are the best in their respective games, while Marcus is not in his. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swordsalmon Posted October 8, 2008 Share Posted October 8, 2008 And yet the other Paladins surpass him and Titania, eventually. Marcus does not have terrible growths; he doesn't have the best growths ever, I admit, but he's useable. No one really surpasses Seth, except for possibly Moulder. :/ He has some really nice supports that more than make up for Seth's slightly weaker end-game stats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_____ Posted October 8, 2008 Share Posted October 8, 2008 That's why I don't consider them to be truly awesome characters. But they are both better for their respective games than Marcus is for this one. Yet he's still useable, and he's still a moderatly useful character. I could say "Aran sucks because Nephenee is better!", which isn't true. Aran is a good character. He's just overshadowed by Nephenee. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tino Posted October 8, 2008 Share Posted October 8, 2008 Besides, there's no rule that says you can't use both Aran and Nephenee. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florete Posted October 8, 2008 Share Posted October 8, 2008 Yet he's still useable, and he's still a moderatly useful character. I could say "Aran sucks because Nephenee is better!", which isn't true. Aran is a good character. He's just overshadowed by Nephenee. I didn't say he was unusable. But I find it better to use him as little as possible. He's not horrible later in the game, but everyone else will likely be so much better that he'll seem that much worse. Thus, I find using him a lot to generally be a bad idea. Aran is on a different team for a while, so his usefulness is much different. Come endgame, I much prefer Nephenee myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_____ Posted October 8, 2008 Share Posted October 8, 2008 (edited) I didn't say he was unusable. But I find it better to use him as little as possible. He's not horrible later in the game, but everyone else will likely be so much better that he'll seem that much worse. Thus, I find using him a lot to generally be a bad idea.Aran is on a different team for a while, so his usefulness is much different. Come endgame, I much prefer Nephenee myself. But you do admit that a unit that is surpassed by another unit still has a chance to be used and can be useful for a period of time, correct? Edited October 9, 2008 by ChaosNinji Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.