Heliosan Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Is it too early to be asking about a tier list for the characters in all three paths? Curious if there is one around and if this has been asked already, I would greatly appreciate a link to the discussion / list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshcja Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 (edited) There's one up just look for the topic that reads "tier list" It's completely wrong in every possible way, but it exists. Edit: If you want a sane and reasonable tier list for each game/difficulty you're SOL but here's some cancer http://serenesforest.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=61289 Edited March 24, 2016 by joshcja Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSND Alter Dragon Boner Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 From what i know Camilla, MU, and Xander is S tire, and Jacob is A Tire I guess Arthur and Charlotte is A+ in term of "should i deploy this unit?" kind of consideration. Fighter is too good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heliosan Posted March 24, 2016 Author Share Posted March 24, 2016 There's one up just look for the topic that reads "tier list" It's completely wrong in every possible way, but it exists. Edit: If you want a sane and reasonable tier list for each game/difficulty you're SOL but here's some cancer http://serenesforest.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=61289 Hmm what about it is wrong from your perspective before I go ahead and start reading the thread? From what i know Camilla, MU, and Xander is S tire, and Jacob is A Tire I guess Arthur and Charlotte is A+ in term of "should i deploy this unit?" kind of consideration. Fighter is too good Hmm yeah, I can see that for those characters, but I am more curious about a more holistic list. I guess that's a good start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayvee94 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 How about we classify the tier based on how often they appear in PvP just like Pokémon. Overused Underused Never used Etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaymew Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Anything Goes: Avatar Never Used: Mikoto, Garon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayvee94 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Anything Goes: Avatar Never Used: Mikoto, Garon Pffffftt.... Hahaha hahaha. Good one. What about Takumi and the other characters.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSND Alter Dragon Boner Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Lol the one opinion i had that everyone else would disagree is probably Gunter and Izana is really good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoesntKnowHowToPlay Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Conquest tier list in a nutshell: S: Some combination of Corrin, Silas, Odin, Jakob, and various kids A: Most peopleB: Most people that join late or are unpopular C: Nyx D: Gunter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaosFox Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 I know the royals would definitely be top tier. The first servant would be high up too, but if we were to place one over the other, I would go with Jakob. I tried using Felicia in a male run and I vastly preferred Jakob during my female run. Kids would be high up as well. I think Nyx or Orochi would be low ranked. Nyx for being to fragile and Orochi for being way to slow. Gunter low because those growths, Keaton would be high ranking due to decent speed and great bulk though he would be out ranked by his daughter. Rinkah would also be mid tier due to her tankiness but low strength growth. I don't know how other people would be placed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshcja Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 (edited) Hmm what about it is wrong from your perspective before I go ahead and start reading the thread? Hmm yeah, I can see that for those characters, but I am more curious about a more holistic list. I guess that's a good start. It's entirely subjective and a lot of people who voted are bad at the game or only did one run. It's also not seperated by difficulty (Certain characters are much better on lunatic while others are much better on normal). Also royals get heavily overrated. Lol the one opinion i had that everyone else would disagree is probably Gunter and Izana is really good Nah, forceful partner/free rallybot/staffbot is legit AF Edited March 24, 2016 by joshcja Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minternets Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Tier lists have too many things that would make them appear wrong to everyone, as this thread has made clear. Skill shops? Mess Hall? path bonuses? grinding? Subjectivity is a bitch. Except for Gunter. Gunter sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jiac Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 (edited) Please note I'm not counting kids since their placement varies depending on parent. Doing one on every specific parent would take too much time. However, I believe that their placement on the tier list would correlate with the tier of their parents. I've only played Conquest so far, and played it on every single difficulty. I will keep in mind certain characters (such as Azura) are utility, and will not consider the ability of certain characters in different classes. (Samurai Odin is really good) They're also ordered by how good they are in their particular tier. Conquest: ~TOP~ -Xander -Corrin -Effie ~High~ -Camilla -Leo -Silas -Keaton -Izana ~Upper Mid~ -Kaze -Shura -Felicia -Niles -Jakob -Laslow ~Mid~ -Odin -Arthur -Charlotte -Azura -Elise -Benny ~Lower Mid~ -Beruka -Selena -Flora -Nyx -Peri -Gunther ~Low~ -Mozu Skills weren't as considered in this tier list, but played a part in certain rankings. Supports took some part, namely in Izana not being top tier. The argument can be made that he's top tier solely by his stats and his rally skills, while having such an easy recruitment requirement. However, his time of recruitment makes his use extremely limited and his limited supports do make a huge difference since supports give +Hit, +Avo and +Crit Avoid. EDIT: Oh man I just realized he was asking if there was only one available. Not just a tier list... EDIT 2: Further revisions. Edited March 24, 2016 by ~Summer~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reality Posted May 10, 2016 Share Posted May 10, 2016 LTC importance is more fun than tier-listing. Especially if we get into the gritty details of how Camillia's kit changes depending on what her support gives her. Or practically anyone else for that matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lazydoggamer Posted May 10, 2016 Share Posted May 10, 2016 (edited) r/fireemblem has made a community birthright tier list and is in the middle of a conquest one https://www.reddit.com/r/fireemblem/comments/4h752t/rfireemblem_makes_a_birthright_tier_list_final/ https://www.reddit.com/r/fireemblem/comments/4iq93r/rfireemblem_makes_a_fates_conquest_tier_list/ Edited May 10, 2016 by lazydoggamer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity Posted May 10, 2016 Share Posted May 10, 2016 necroposting is also more fun than not breaking rules as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts