Greencapps Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 160 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefaultBeep Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 161 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Glacies Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 2 hours ago, Mackc2 said: But it's unnatural and I am now scared what this game will demand from me, could it be my money, or am I doomed to never pull Katarina I have a Katarina. She's really good, though not as good as my Olwen. And I'm a casual noob player. But of course, I still have yet to get Ninian, so... Furret. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefaultBeep Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 Just now, Rex Glacies said: I have a Katarina. She's really good, though not as good as my Olwen. And I'm a casual noob player. But of course, I still have yet to get Ninian, so... Furret. I would trade my Ninian for a Katarina in a heartbeat. Not even joking. I do have Olwen at least. +Spd and Life and Death 3 can make her pretty great. Please... please tell me that's not also a Pokémon name? 163 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interdimensional Observer Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 (edited) 163- the Pokemon who owns a restaurant chain where the ladies wear atrociously colored clothing. 164- Kaepora Gaebora Edited October 13, 2017 by Interdimensional Observer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Glacies Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 4 minutes ago, DefaultBeep said: I would trade my Ninian for a Katarina in a heartbeat. Not even joking. I do have Olwen at least. +Spd and Life and Death 3 can make her pretty great. Please... please tell me that's not also a Pokémon name? 163 I would trade her for Ninian as well. I mean, she's certainly not bad... but Ninian! I think my Olwen is +Res. Not great, but it works well with Glacies. Because all my units need to have Glacies. And Furret is a Pokemon, yes. 6 minutes ago, Interdimensional Observer said: 162- the Pokemon who owns a restaurant chain where the ladies wear atrociously colored clothing. Hate to burst your bubble, but Furret is 162 (Hoothoot is 163), and you were ninja'd so it should be Noctowl. And now, I am Ledyba. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interdimensional Observer Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 166- the Power Ranger bug? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefaultBeep Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 Just now, Rex Glacies said: I would trade her for Ninian as well. I mean, she's certainly not bad... but Ninian! I think my Olwen is +Res. Not great, but it works well with Glacies. Because all my units need to have Glacies. And Furret is a Pokemon, yes. Having a dancer is great, but I've already got Azura and Olivia, so I could spare my Ninian, although she is my favorite of the three. I mainly just want to get more red mages that aren't Tharja (she's broken my pity rate twice now), and Katarina has the advantage of being from my favorite game while also just being a better Tharja. I do have Sanaki (also off-banner, somehow), but I have yet to play FE10, so she doesn't mean a whole lot to me. I hope you don't have anyone like Hector or Lukas, or else I feel bad for them. There are times when I'm proud of clever Pokémon names. This is not one of those times. Proof of why Gen 1 is the best Pokémon Gen. 167 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interdimensional Observer Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 5 minutes ago, DefaultBeep said: There are times when I'm proud of clever Pokémon names. This is not one of those times. Proof of why Gen 1 is the best Pokémon Gen.  We had Seel in the first gen as was visually shown earlier! Seel, the seal Pokemon! Clever? Not at all! 168- it's hanging over your head right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefaultBeep Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 Just now, Interdimensional Observer said: We had Seel in the first gen as was visually shown earlier! Seel, the seal Pokemon! Clever? Not at all! Don't call me out when I'm pretending to know about anything related to Pokémon! In my defense, I don't think Seel was in Pokémon Snap or Pokémon Monopoly, so it basically doesn't exist to me. Those are my only two sources of Pokémon knowledge. 169 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interdimensional Observer Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 Just now, DefaultBeep said: Don't call me out when I'm pretending to know about anything related to Pokémon!  As long as you don't call me out when I pretend to be interested in FE Heroes. 170. The dead looking anglerfish thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefaultBeep Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, Interdimensional Observer said: As long as you don't call me out when I pretend to be interested in FE Heroes. Your disinterest in Heroes provides a very unique viewpoint within the Heroes threads. You're always welcome to be uncaring toward it, in my opinion. Let's hope they never do anything that would make you want to play it. 171 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greencapps Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 (edited) 172 Anyone mind explaining how to cross out text on the these forums. Edited October 13, 2017 by Greencapps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefaultBeep Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Greencapps said: 172 Anyone mind explaining how to cross out text on the these forums. Assuming you're on a computer, there should be four icons in the upper left of the post editor. B is for Bold text, I is for Italics, U is for Underlined Text, and S is for Strike-through text. There's some other fun options up there as well, like links within text and various listing and alignment formats. 173 Edited October 13, 2017 by DefaultBeep Good job confusing right and left, me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interdimensional Observer Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 27 minutes ago, DefaultBeep said: Your disinterest in Heroes provides a very unique viewpoint within the Heroes threads. You're always welcome to be uncaring toward it, in my opinion. Let's hope they never do anything that would make you want to play it. Well perhaps I'll come around when Micaiah's crew comes in. Or maybe not. Maybe it'll be the day TMS gets in, or the Laguz, or when all the games have representation. Then again, if the BK didn't get me in, there are few things that will. Sephiran being one of them possibly. If my Touma sprite request gets done, maybe then I'll come in. I'd be FtP and wouldn't care about arena rankings too much. I'd probably set a thousand projects for myself, and finish none.  10 minutes ago, Greencapps said: Anyone mind explaining how to cross out text on the these forums. Look at the bar atop the message box, and select the S with a strike through it, next to the U with the underline. Highlight  174 is one ugly baby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefaultBeep Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 10 minutes ago, Interdimensional Observer said: Well perhaps I'll come around when Micaiah's crew comes in. Or maybe not. Maybe it'll be the day TMS gets in, or the Laguz, or when all the games have representation. Then again, if the BK didn't get me in, there are few things that will. Sephiran being one of them possibly. If my Touma sprite request gets done, maybe then I'll come in. I'd be FtP and wouldn't care about arena rankings too much. I'd probably set a thousand projects for myself, and finish none. 174 is one ugly baby. What do you mean, all the games already have representation! Aren't one FE10-exclusive and two FE5-exclusive characters enough representation? And what's TMS and Archanea Saga? Get that worthless poor man's Jigglypuff out of my face. 175 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 176 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 (edited) And the double post strikes again, so have a Edited October 13, 2017 by RedRob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anime27Arts Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 177 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interdimensional Observer Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 12 minutes ago, DefaultBeep said: Get that worthless poor man's Jigglypuff out of my face.  That's the baby version of Jigglypuff, though it looks like it came out the womb prematurely. Better than this old Pokemon Japanese Red/Green thing: Spoiler Yes, Mew is based on an embryo/fetus. Thus explaining why it is able to learn all HMs and TMs and is the originator of all presumably non-legendary Pokemon.  179. I'm tired, it feels like I'm dreaming of counting electric sheep.  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefaultBeep Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 3 minutes ago, Interdimensional Observer said: That's the baby version of Jigglypuff, though it looks like it came out the womb prematurely. Better than this old Pokemon Japanese Red/Green thing:  Hide contents Yes, Mew is based on an embryo/fetus. Thus explaining why it is able to learn all HMs and TMs and is the originator of all presumably non-legendary Pokemon.  Was Jigglypuff not a Gen 1 Pokémon? Or was it one of those that got a pre-evolution in a later Gen? Not gonna lie, that's kinda cute. Not the cutest, but still decently cute, in its own way. 180 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 The latter. 181 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interdimensional Observer Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 33 minutes ago, DefaultBeep said: Was Jigglypuff not a Gen 1 Pokémon? Or was it one of those that got a pre-evolution in a later Gen? One of those pre-evolutions, "Baby Pokemon" some call them, they're useless in gameplay, and exist solely for the cutesies (which is fine). Of the ones the 2nd Gen added, I like either Elekid or Magby the most.  182 the predecessor to Alola- Bellossom! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefaultBeep Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 Gotcha, that makes sense then. I was afraid that my Snap knowledge had begun to fail me... 183 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christactics Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 (edited) 184. i don't know what I'm doing. Edited October 13, 2017 by Christactics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.