Cynthia Posted December 14, 2008 Share Posted December 14, 2008 Regarding Far From the Forest, it seems rather useless to me anyway to bump a useless topic with a probably even more useless post. Precisely my point. Now if the topic has some discussion value, I can sort of see it. As there are a FEW in that section that have some discussion value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tino Posted December 14, 2008 Share Posted December 14, 2008 Even if that would be the case, I don't see a reason to bump it. Also, a topic of two months old is at page 65 or something, and I doubt someone has a good reason to bump such a relatively old topic (since it's age is relatively older than a topic of two months old that's on page 2, for example). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YokaiKnight Posted December 14, 2008 Share Posted December 14, 2008 (edited) What use is it if someone bumps a 5 month old thread just to say he voted for Fiona in a "fav female cav" poll? Relevant, sure, but also quite useless. Then we move on with our lives? It's not much worse than someone posting in a 1-day old topic with "Florina ^___^." A dull post is dull whether it's five minutes old or five months old. EDIT: Even if that would be the case, I don't see a reason to bump it.People make all kinds of posts for no satisfactory reason that are still allowed. Generally, destructive behavior should be punished; disagreeable behavior should only be discouraged. Edited December 14, 2008 by YokaiKnight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts