uguu Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Then does that mean A=D? And C=E, but does A=C? And if A does =C then does A=E? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NTG Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 If A=B and B=D, I would assume A=D. And if C=E, don't know about A=C because there's not enough information. But if A does = C, then I'd assume A=E. (Or rather than =, they are equivalent...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanz Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 I have been sitting here trying to think of something witty to say but I can't, so I am just not going to say anything...except this of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meteor Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uguu Posted January 11, 2008 Author Share Posted January 11, 2008 Then does that mean A=D? And C=E, but does A=C? And if A does =C then does A=E? Hi me! If A=B and B=D, I would assume A=D. And if C=E, don't know about A=C because there's not enough information. But if A does = C, then I'd assume A=E. (Or rather than =, they are equivalent...) There's plenty of information, D comes after C, and since letters before C and D, which comes after C are equal to each other that means that it has to be equal to them... I think I have been sitting here trying to think of something witty to say but I can't, so I am just not going to say anything...except this of course. That's not witty. Yes. Of course! The answer to everything is obviously yes! I see it now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meteor Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Exactly! How simple was that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uguu Posted January 11, 2008 Author Share Posted January 11, 2008 Hi me!There's plenty of information, D comes after C, and since letters before C and D, which comes after C are equal to each other that means that it has to be equal to them... I think That's not witty. Of course! The answer to everything is obviously yes! I see it now! Hi me! Exactly! How simple was that? No it wasn't, you're good at math. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CGV Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 I've always loved math Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurion_Emblem Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 I like math that involves thinking...not just "lol, search the book for obscure equations! and then get the wrong answer regardless... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uguu Posted January 11, 2008 Author Share Posted January 11, 2008 I've always loved math Lol, when I first read that post I read "I've always loved maRth" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NTG Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 There's plenty of information, D comes after C, and since letters before C and D, which comes after C are equal to each other that means that it has to be equal to them... I think Well, the facts seem to be that A=B, B=D, and C=E. It could be a pattern, but it could not be too, so it may or may not be A=C. And if it was a pattern, A=B seems irregular since B is 1 after A, while for B=D and C=E there's 2 between them. Or otherwise, I still think there's not enough facts to prove A=C. Hmm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vangaurd Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 It only works if A is the derivative of B and E is the integral of C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 Bump, for great justice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robo Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 If only that tired old internet meme were as great as math eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufasa Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 It all depends on your construct of reality in a philisophical point of view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inactive Account Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 Move variable for great justice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robo Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 It all depends on your construct of reality in a philisophical point of view. Let me tell you: From a purely philisophical point of view, if A=B and B=D, A=D. When C=E and A=C, that means A=E, which would mean anything is anything, making a void of infinite possibilities where line-up is concerned. Since there is no great justice or zig in a void of any sort, any of your jokes fail from the construct of reality in a philisophical point of view. If my first post here was A, and you post was B, then A=B, this post is D and A=D. Your post is as void as the statement your trying to make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufasa Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 ......kay... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robo Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 That was my construct of reality in a philisophical point of view. Sorry about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanz Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inactive Account Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 The funniest thing is that my math teacher says that a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaonohiokala Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 B=D is similar to 8=D because they both look like a, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 A=B if sin = 1/2 and cos = 7/3. B=D if tan = 8, and cot = 2. (67y + 80x + 10b) (4t - 709a + 34x) = The answer to life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufasa Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 The meaning of life = 42 At least according to Douglas Adams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 Douglas Adams is a con man. I am the Eggman, whatever I say is correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts