CrashGordon94 Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 Right, in my Gordin vs. Norne topic, people were talking about using Castor instead, then taking up that point, I got wondering about the question in this topic. Which Bow using Class is better, excluding Reclass? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ϲharlie Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 I'd say that Hunter --> Horseman is better because the Hunter class has a stronger start than the Archer class. Archers receive a pretty significant boost when they promote, but I think it's more important to have a decent base than having good promotion gains. Though I really think that mixing and matching classes through reclass is better than a straight up Archer --> Sniper or Hunter --> Horseman. =\ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel M Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 (edited) The better routes are something like Cavalier (Pegasus Knight) -> Sniper (weird, huh?) and Hunter -> Warrior (better weapon selection with the better rank nevertheless). Horseman is still somewhat usable so... yeah, Hunter -> Horseman. EDIT: Though I'm not 100% sure on this, some might be able to work Hunter -> General if they have a good Def growth in the Hunter class (someone like Kashim or Dolph rolls in my head, but FEPlanet doesn't work on this computer). Edited June 22, 2009 by Colonel M Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bros Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 I voted for Hunter to Horsemen for Wolf and Sedgar. They are both great. Reclass them for even better. As a General they can use bows so they'll have the Defense of a General with bows. I know you said no Reclasas but I thought I'd mention this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacknight9 Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 I voted for Hunter to Horsemen for Wolf and Sedgar. They are both great. Reclass them for even better. As a General they can use bows so they'll have the Defense of a General with bows. I know you said no Reclasas but I thought I'd mention this. and who the hell woul use a general? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodykitty Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 and who the hell woul use a general? Anybody wanting to make single player easy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel M Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 and who the hell woul use a general? Anybody wanting to make single player easy. Or broken. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacknight9 Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 Or broken. single player and online are 2 diffrent things though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodykitty Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 Then it's a good thing this topic isn't WiFi specific, otherwise it probably would have been specified as such. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bros Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 I use Sedgar as a General. He can barwely be damaged by Silver Weapons. And they can use Bows and he seems to want a bow wielding class. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacknight9 Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 I use Sedgar as a General. He can barwely be damaged by Silver Weapons. And they can use Bows and he seems to want a bow wielding class. ... genersals get doubled by everything and forges almost screw defense plus the magic factor. your general will be scrap if he meets a forged hammered beserker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Draper Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 For the last time, THIS IS NOT A WI-FI TOPIC Did you not see the post two above yours? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel M Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 Also Generals can't be OHKOed by a Warrior assuming max / max. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppleObsessedGuy Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 I voted for Archer-Sniper but then I realized it was no reclass. In that case, Hunter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoNameAtAll Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 ... genersals get doubled by everything and forges almost screw defense plus the magic factor. your general will be scrap if he meets a forged hammered beserker They're not Wi-Fi. Read the posts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashGordon94 Posted June 24, 2009 Author Share Posted June 24, 2009 I'm talking about Single-Player. I don't particularly care about Wi-Fi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylvan Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 I voted archer->sniper Hunter->horseman have terrible growths. They don't grow in def or in hp, and have only ok speed. Archers generally have lower attack, but are more durable. Also, for the wifi thing, no horseman for wifi sould ever be trained as hunter->horseman. I know it's not totally relevant, since this isn't a wifi discussion. But that's my logic. I would still vote archer->sniper for wifi, over hunter->horseman, since their growths are so bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ϲharlie Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 Hunter->horseman have terrible growths. They don't grow in def or in hp, and have only ok speed. Archers generally have lower attack, but are more durable. Archers and Hunters have virtually identical class growths. Any growth differences between the two are a measly 5%, except for strength which Hunters win by 10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ercdouken Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 My vote goes to Hunter -> Horseman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacknight9 Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 For the last time, THIS IS NOT A WI-FI TOPICDid you not see the post two above yours? no i didn't actualy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galenforcer Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 Hunter->Horsemen are slightly more usable than archer->sniper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deliriyum Posted June 25, 2009 Share Posted June 25, 2009 (edited) I say archer->Sniper... hunter-> Horseman is better, but archer->Sniper can use the longbow and I just personally like archer's stats better Edited June 25, 2009 by core34510 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roxas Posted June 25, 2009 Share Posted June 25, 2009 I'm more of a Hunter-> Horseman person Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizz Posted June 25, 2009 Share Posted June 25, 2009 snipers :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fei Mao Posted June 26, 2009 Share Posted June 26, 2009 Voted for Hunter->Horseman It depends on your strategy, a problem with archer sometimes is that an enemy might be in a spot where the archers 5 movement could not get in range to attack the enemy. Sometimes rushing is used often so archers probably couldn't keep up with some of the units. Sometimes the archer might be one damage off to kill the enemy because they might have lower strength than a hunter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.