Junkhead Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 (edited) I think it's Oswin, despite me not having used him too much over my playthroughs...I just know he is great, his Spd isn't as good as a trained Bors or Wendy, but he sure manages to do well his job, and that is tanking exellently even on HHM. Edited February 6, 2010 by Alan Rainsworth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just call me AL Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Oswin, great bases, great growths, bit of a nice support list, starts off good and ends the same way. Not many armor knights/generals are like that. Outside GBA FEs: FE10!Gatrie, and FEDS reclassed Wolf and Sedgar are his competition. In the GBA FEs only: Basically every other answer is wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Rey León Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 OsWIN is the correct answer. Of course, he got seriously SPD screwed in my last two playthroughs, but he was still a great tank, even if he was having double trouble. -_- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Oswin. Nothing else comes close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deliriyum Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Oswin, with Gilliam, Barth, and Bors miles behind him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkhead Posted February 6, 2010 Author Share Posted February 6, 2010 Gilliam is his nerfed version, well...the only thing Gilliam matches up to or surpasses are slight Str & Skill difference, Oswin has a Spd & Res lead, he also doesn't suffer from earlygame axe users. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Spoon Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Wallace. He's just awesome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ϲharlie Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Oswin is probably the best, but I voted for Wallace just for shiggles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whase Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 you forgot to add Amelia :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just call me AL Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 you forgot to add Amelia :P I don't think he's counting her since she can go either go pally, GK, or 3rd tier recruit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whase Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 I don't think he's counting her since she can go either go pally, GK, or 3rd tier recruit. Unfair! :( I could also say "I don't use gilliam so he won't become a general. he shouldn't be on the list" she can become a general so she should be there IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Wendy all the way Bitch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just call me AL Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Wendy all the way Bitch. Bad bases, bad support list, bad joining situation, and eventually enters an axefest when fielded. Don't really see how she's good. And no, hacking does not count towards usefulness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkhead Posted February 6, 2010 Author Share Posted February 6, 2010 Unfair! :( I could also say "I don't use gilliam so he won't become a general. he shouldn't be on the list" she can become a general so she should be there IMO. That "he" he was reffering to was me. @Al: He's talking about his experience even though it doesn't matter here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emeraldfox Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Where's the 'All of them' option? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just call me AL Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 (edited) Where's the 'All of them' option? Other than Oswin, FE10!Gatrie, and FEDS reclassed Wolf and Sedgar, has there been a really good general in the FE series? I'm afraid not. I know Gilliam's decent and all, but still. The amount of good generals in the FE series in general is a pretty low number. Edited February 6, 2010 by LittleAl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emeraldfox Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Other than Oswin, FE10!Gatrie, and FEDS reclassed Wolf and Sedgar, has there been a really good general in the FE series? I'm afraid not. I know Gilliam's decent and all, but still. The amount of good generals in the FE series in general is a pretty low number. Hey, I asked where the 'All of them' option was. Not for your crap, mmkay? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roxas Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 OSW1N! :D War har har. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just call me AL Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Hey, I asked where the 'All of them' option was. Not for your crap, mmkay? And all I'm saying is: There's really no point in putting in the "All of them" option, since the total amount of actually good generals can be counted on one hand. Whether it's GBA FEs only or the entire FE series. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emeraldfox Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 And all I'm saying is: There's really no point in putting in the "All of them" option, since the total amount of actually good generals can be counted on one hand. Whether it's GBA FEs only or the entire FE series. And all I'm saying is; I didn't ask for your crap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just call me AL Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 And all I'm saying is; I didn't ask for your crap. Someone else, if not me, was probably gonna say it anyways. And stating facts =/= "spreading crap around" as you like to put it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Rey León Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Unfair! :( I could also say "I don't use gilliam so he won't become a general. he shouldn't be on the list" she can become a general so she should be there IMO. Smart people don't make her a General anyway so it's a non-issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Bad bases, bad support list, bad joining situation, and eventually enters an axefest when fielded. Don't really see how she's good. And no, hacking does not count towards usefulness. D: At least she has a Triangle attack. When you have three Maxed Generals, they kick ass :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkhead Posted February 6, 2010 Author Share Posted February 6, 2010 Yes, but no one can max out WITHOUT hacking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel M Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 The lack of Roger and Draug is dis- oh wait wrong game. Eh... probably toss my vote to Oswin Osborne, but Gilliam Bojangles at least promotes to a unit with a stat called "movement". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.