bottlegnomes Posted June 3, 2012 Share Posted June 3, 2012 (edited) She still has better bases than Catria, no matter how large/small the leads. Is what anyone has said in this topic factually invalid? Unless it is, why does it matter? As we've seen in other RTUs, people put different weight on different things, so for some people Palla's better bases might actually matter, while for others they might not be big enough to matter. Edited June 3, 2012 by bottlegnomes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Horace Posted June 3, 2012 Share Posted June 3, 2012 (edited) the better bases honestly don't really matter in H2, which I think is what this rating thingy is for H5 is a different matter but that's not the point of the ratings Edited June 3, 2012 by General Horace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor Odinson Posted June 3, 2012 Share Posted June 3, 2012 (edited) I don't think it's an issue if the rater gave Palla a score not outrageously higher than Catria's before factoring in biases Like they may mention bases and ranks separately but if all Palla is winning is around a point or less then it's not really counted separately But yeah. stuff that's been mentioned. Bases/ranks, closer to promotion. Loses to Catria by 40% speed but at her jointime, bases/ranks--especially the ranks-- edge out growths as an advantage IMO, so I'll just give her .5 over what I gave Catria. 5.5/10 and I'll gave her the same .5 bias I gave to Catria too because Palla's pretty cool. 6/10 Edited June 3, 2012 by Fat Bunny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity Posted June 3, 2012 Share Posted June 3, 2012 I don't think it's an issue if the rater gave Palla a score not outrageously higher than Catria's before factoring in biases oh lol I didn't even realize that we'd done Catria already I'm not bitching about scores here - and it's not a factual inaccuracy - it just bothered me that this particular bullet was getting such regular attention. It's not like one guy said it, it's a distinct trend to explicitly point out that one strength. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I don't play for turns Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 I just noticed that Wendy>Macellan. I know I was a little late. I don't play Shadow dragon often, so I can't really rate here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bottlegnomes Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 oh lol I didn't even realize that we'd done Catria already I'm not bitching about scores here - and it's not a factual inaccuracy - it just bothered me that this particular bullet was getting such regular attention. It's not like one guy said it, it's a distinct trend to explicitly point out that one strength. It is still a point in her favor, even if it is incredibly minor. But fair enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Weapon ranks count as part of her bases, in my rating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Weapon ranks count as part of her bases, in my rating. In your rating, sure, but since when were you ever the person I was complaining about? :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel M Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 OrangeCrush is usually just mad all the time. As for Palla, even though the rating is done... I think she stands out slightly better, but I can sort of see how one could kind of conclude Catria > Palla if they think a lot higher on long-term. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.