Tino Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Yes, please. I'll let you pick the condition(s) you like most ; ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vykan12 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 I think Brom vs Soren (me) would be interesting under those conditions. I'd probably change infinite forging to no forges at all though. Arguing an archer would also be fun if we tossed in crossbows, 1-3 range upon promotion and of course the buffed version of the double bow. Rolf vs Shinon maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tino Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Then I'd say Brom vs. Soren is more interesting. Though, with SS weapons, do you mean we use the SS weapons from RD? And the support-everyone-that-exists thing... How does that work? How many chapters until you can support someone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vykan12 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Let's see... The S rank weapons would basically be silver Mt + 3 and have the bonuses they gave in RD. IE Rexflame would still give +3 spd, Urvan would give res +3, etc. For supports... let's say it grows 1 level every 5 chapters? Tbh I don't mind dropping that condition for now and sticking with regular supports. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tino Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 So then these would be the conditions, right? -Removable skills -Buyable killer weapons lategame. -SS weapons that don't suck. Sounds good to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vykan12 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 K i'll open then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel M Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 I understand that I have debates going on (I'm pretty sure Camtech is ready to scream in my ear), but I did have some SD ideas: - Gordon, Radd, and Nabarl are swapped into the Brute class. Gordon starts as a Hunter, Radd and Nabarl are Mercenaries. - Radd w/boosted growths and bases vs. early-joining Est (dunno how this will work) - Something vs. Zag / Wolf with their growths cut in half Some might seem pretty dumb, but I thought the first one was kind of interesting (Gordon would have an lol80% HP growth backed by a 50% Def growth. WTF?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reikken Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 Conditional debates? Now that's an idea. It sounds very interesting. I'm totally up for one (or more) of those. (like auto-growing FE7 supports removes my second biggest gripe with the game, super slow support growth. (The first is terrible enemy stats after the early chapters.)) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT075 Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 (I'm pretty sure Camtech is ready to scream in my ear) Maybe, but I've taken longer than this (lol one month) to write a response. And if you want to do those debates, I'd be happy to. Especially the Gordin one :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheetah7071 Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 Anybody want to debate FE5? Just completed it again and I feel like arguing about it. I'd prefer to defend either Tanya or Sara. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mekkah Posted July 12, 2009 Author Share Posted July 12, 2009 I'd like to defend Ralph or Dagda, but considering these character's availability and tier positions maybe it's a better idea if I take Marty instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheetah7071 Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 (edited) I'm willing to debate Tanya vs Ralph if you like, they're in the same tier, and I think that tier list underrates Tanya. Tanya vs Marty is also fine if you think using Ralph won't be a challenge. Edited July 12, 2009 by cheetah7071 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vykan12 Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 Tanya and Ralph shouldn't be in the same tier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mekkah Posted July 12, 2009 Author Share Posted July 12, 2009 It's not so much a challenge as it is arguing that Tanya is detrimental for over half the game. I prefer head to head debates rather than arguing using Tanya vs not using Tanya for most of it. So that's why I'd rather take Marty. Who opens? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheetah7071 Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 If you have a preference, I'll let you choose. If you have no preference, I'll go ahead and open tomorrow after I've gotten some sleep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mekkah Posted July 12, 2009 Author Share Posted July 12, 2009 I'll just open then because I'm bored. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soundecho Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 Debate please :D FE10 mid or low tiers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progenitus Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 (edited) I can debate with you if you want. Don't worry, I'm a lot less aggressive and insulting when in a real debate. here's the current list for easier reference... Middle (15) Mist Marcia Heather Tauroneo Brom Muarim Tanith Skrimir Caineghis Giffca Kieran Geoffrey Calill Rhys Soren Lower Middle (11) Lucia Volke Stefan Tormod Edward Rolf Leonardo Nealuchi Nasir Makalov Illyana Low (13) Vika Sigrun Danved Bastian Ena Kurthnaga Renning Lehran Gareth Oliver Pelleas Kyza Lethe Bottom (5) Sanaki Meg Astrid Lyre Fiona I personally think Boyd should be in mid tier, and Mist/Heather/Cain/Giffca should be moved into upper mid. Edited July 14, 2009 by smash fanatic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soundecho Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 Some interesting match ups I can see. Lucia vs Kieran and Brom vs Tanith. Feel free to bring up other match ups. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progenitus Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 (edited) I don't think Brom vs Tanith will be very fair for the person supporting Tanith. Lucia vs Kieran could be interesting, maybe. A few other suggestions... Volke vs Stefan Boyd vs Brom vs Marcia (not all three at the same time, of course) Anyway, I can open, whenever we decide on a matchup Edited July 14, 2009 by smash fanatic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soundecho Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 (edited) Hmm I'm game with Lucia vs Kieran or Boyd vs Marcia. You pick one and open. Edit: if you pick Lucia vs Kieran, I'd like to support Lucia. Edited July 14, 2009 by soundecho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progenitus Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 I'll take Kieran then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zkirsche Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 I'm sorry Reikken, but I'm leaving for Ireland on Satruday and I probably won't have internet access, meaning that I won't be able to counter any posts you make from now until a week on Tuesday. So yeah, sorry about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vykan12 Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 @Tino: Sorry about the Soren vs Brom debate, I got really pre-occupied with other stuff. I'll try and open today or tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tino Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 No problem. I'm just afraid I might not get a counter in before I leave next Monday... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts