Defeatist Elitist

See, I was going to say something, and pretend to have a humorous misunderstanding where I believed you where referring to Football, as opposed to American Football, but I'm not motivated enough.

I live in BC, pretty close to Vancouver.

I live in Canada. Salut, mon ami.

Wait, how does that help? Or did I just ask the wrong question?

Lawl. Also, just to clarify. Their is no chance of the world being destroyed, for several reasons. First of all, the chance of black holes actually being created are slim to none, but in the event that they are created they would have at most the mass of a couple atoms. Now, in order for a black hole to actually pull in matter and grow, it must have at least THE MASS OF OUR SUN. Anything smaller and it will dissipate and collapse, at an increased rate, the smaller it is. So, if black holes are created, they will last less than a second. In addition, these conditions occur all the time when cosmic rays bombard the earth, however they simply are very difficult to observe. In conclusion, Doomsayers are twits.

But this is our whole point. A fact doesn't have to be 100% proveable, since nothing is. It just has to have a fair bit of evidence and backup, and more than anything else presented.

Palin vs Biden is like a pornstar versus a highly educated and decorated Professor. One is hawt and good for sex, and the other is good for everything else.

Alright. This one shouldn't be too hard to debate, since they're both pretty even characters anyway. My "I know this character is actually better" senses shouldn't get in the way. :P

Pairing between two polar opposites, one who happens to weigh 10 times as much as the other >>>>>>>> anything else. Ever. Even breathing.

Who watches? I've been a pretty big fan most of my life, but I haven't seen nearly enough. I've seen every one of the Original Series movies except for the last one, but I did see Generations. I've also seen most of the other movies (First Contact was one of my favorites). I've seen a fair number of TNG and Voyager episodes, but most of the ones I've seen are from Enterprise (the shame). I barely saw OS or DS9. What about you?

But... But... Look at them! They're so cute! ^_^

Half Necro, but I will now have to kill you for not going HectorxFlorina. It is against the natural order of things!

You want a vote thingy? If not, I'd volunteer as a judge if you'd like.

Well, my team usually ends up around the same level, because I usually evenly distribute the kills, BUT, if a character comes 20 levels ahead of the time, and I want to use them A)I'm not going to just sit them out until everyone else catches up, and B)I should still evenly distribute kills. It just makes sense. Why would you leave a member of your team off, being totally useless for half the game?

Poorly defined question. Please extrapolate. :P Too many to list, cannot properly answer. Not Ryoko Asakura?, or

Have you read the thread? Honest question. That's the whole point, no matter how their stats could differ at 20/20, Titania will ALWAYS HAVE A LEVEL LEAD. :P

NO WAI! Of course, it would more accurately reflect it lyrically. :P

If you learn anything from Fire Emblem it should be that "It's good because it's ours" is a REALLY stupid attitude. Yes, I'm looking at you Micaiah.

But that was kind of my point. Given that they where debating, and the standards and ideals of debate, what they said would be considered fact.

I exaggerated slightly, but I believe the point still stands. Hitler could have done far more things that would have benefited Germany a lot more. Hitler was not a good example of a leader who raised his nation up. When a nation begins to invade, as Germany did, they seem to suddenly begin booming economically, however this is an illusion. The fact is, Germany's economy only appeared strong, because of the spoils of war. This is why, as Germany finally stopped expanding, they simply went downhill before losing the war. Germany didn't have a very strong economy, they only managed to progress through the resources they had obtained through the invasion of other nations.

Then... Don't debate? I don't really see what I can, or should say in this situation. Anything else would seem disrespectful...

Alright, then we're probably in agreement.

I have been reading the boards, and testing the waters hear, so now I think I can offer a better response. I will also attempt to avoid being insulting. Many members here seem to no quite understand the concept of debating Fire Emblem. In a Fire Emblem debate, a character is considered "better", in a very concrete way, apart from any play styles or similar, if they are shown to benefit the team most by their use. Playstyle and such never come into it. So while you may be able to use Rolf, and beat the game using him, in the debating arena, it is considered fact that he is the worst character in this game, as it has been proven given these parameters. You may argue with the parameters, and I have tried to explain why they are in place, but nevertheless, that is how things work. Fire Emblem is contrary to what many people say, actually perfect for Tier lists. Because it is not meant for Multiplayer, no real balance is required. Character's are free to have massive advantages over each other. When Tino says something is a fact in a debate, it really is a fact, given the context of debates and their parameters. I think the safest idea would be to say that for people who dislike said parameters, or the debating process, just try not to debate. I know that you (Fox), have clearly stated that you believe no character can be the best because of play styles, etc, but I beg of you, please consider that given the context of such debating parameters as we have provided, that a best character can be established in fact. It doesn't mean that the game is impossible, or even that hard without said character, it simply means that it will be slightly easier with that character. Sadly, it may be quite impossible to fully explain what I mean, but I do hope that you might understand where I'm coming from.

Honestly? No trolling? Not even a smidgen? Hitler could have done quite a bit more for Germany, he did some things that helped, but overall he actually probably hindered them. To your other points. Humans are animals regardless. Animals rape, murder, and do everything like that in order to raise themselves to dominance. They do what is required in order for their survival and the passing on of their genes. Humans just expand on that. But some people try to hold back, they try to not do things when those actions would cause harm to another person, even if that action si clearly in their own best interest. So, really, I don't see where the whole "Lawl, humans are evil" idea comes from. Besides, as I said earlier, good and evil are more opinion than anything.

No, Hitler was insane. :P He could have raised Germany much more easily if he hadn't unbalanced his entire Economy by removing the people who where running it and replacing them with random others. It would have been far more efficient to do many other things. Plus, his obsession with the Occult was just WAY overboard. I'm still not totally convinced you aren't trolling though, so I don't have a totally serious response. ^_^