Playing semantic children's games with a googled dictionary definition lends no credence to your idiotic claim that evidence is something "personal." I'm sure even you can tell the difference between evidence presented to a judicial tribunal, which is often obviously ambiguous and readily manipulated by lawyers to support their position, from evidence for things such as natural selection or the force of gravity, which involve objective phenomena and mathematics. I'm pretty sure you're being intentionally disingenuous at this point.
I'm not interested in continuing this discussion with you in this thread, because unlike yourself, I'm not going to nitpick with Jyosua's post in an attempt to continue what passes for debate with you ad infinitum. I invite you to create a discussion centered around this elsewhere, if you want, so that I can continue stomp on your balls at my leisure without feeling like I'm directly shitting on a staff ruling.