Radiant Dragon Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 (edited) Huh. I see... Who are you planning, then? We can't discuss your choices if you don't give us any (you don't have to make it final as I'm sure you know). Edited September 10, 2011 by Radiant Kitty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psych Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 Right now it's: Me, Pariah, and I guess Paper, RD, and Kevin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 Hmmm. . .on one hand, it's Psych, and he hasn't exactly been active. . .on the other, I saw what happens when we're forced to auto-accept. . .ugh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant Dragon Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 I personally like Psych's proposed plan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psych Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 (edited) Alright then. ##Give Plans to; Psych, Pariah, Paperblade, Radiant Kitty, and Kevin Edit: Bold Edited September 10, 2011 by arachnidsGrip Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zorbees Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 voting no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darros Posted September 11, 2011 Share Posted September 11, 2011 Hm... that team had over half the people on the failed mission. I don't distrust Radiant, Paperblade, or Kevin, but when this mission proposal is really similar to the last one, I think I should vote no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snike Posted September 11, 2011 Share Posted September 11, 2011 voting no I don't necessarily trust Kevin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant Dragon Posted September 11, 2011 Share Posted September 11, 2011 Remember that spy leaders have just as much information access as resistance leaders, as spies aren't informed of other spies. And of course, if one assumes you think like that, then they might do that with who they think is a spy to help one of them blend in. Bringing this back up as food for thought. Legitimate mistake, or Spy trying to act dumb? Opinions? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zorbees Posted September 11, 2011 Share Posted September 11, 2011 itemafia all over again <.< Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanarkin Posted September 11, 2011 Share Posted September 11, 2011 Bringing this back up as food for thought. Legitimate mistake, or Spy trying to act dumb? Opinions? It could be that he misread it. I doubt only that should be enough to make everyone suspicious of Kirsche. Just like it wasn't enough to make everyone suspicious of Proto (IIRC it was some discussion in item mafia i can't remember). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant Dragon Posted September 11, 2011 Share Posted September 11, 2011 It was enough to make people suspicious of Proto for a while. What is Proto's alliance in Itemafia anyway, or is he still alive? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanarkin Posted September 11, 2011 Share Posted September 11, 2011 He died iirc... Anywho, i think we should be wary, but that is not enough to make Kevin unproposable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snike Posted September 11, 2011 Share Posted September 11, 2011 He was possessed. So I am a bit leery of Kevin, yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zkirsche Posted September 11, 2011 Share Posted September 11, 2011 That logic is absolute bullshit. It was in itemafia, and it still is now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paperblade Posted September 11, 2011 Share Posted September 11, 2011 SDS said that he would consider anyone who did what Proto did with the role PMs either scum or an idiot (for not being able to read the rules) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanarkin Posted September 11, 2011 Share Posted September 11, 2011 SDS said that he would consider anyone who did what Proto did with the role PMs either scum or an idiot (for not being able to read the rules) In the defense of my past mistakes (not in kevin's), sometimes you can misread stuff which is understandable. I for one, tend to end up reading words that aren't really there... Whether Kevin had an honest mistake or not i do not know. However, we should be wary of him a little more than everyone. Not only did he make a shady post, he was part of a failed mission. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tables Posted September 12, 2011 Author Share Posted September 12, 2011 Mission Proposal 3.2 by arachnidsGrip Team: zorbees, Pariah, Radiant Kitty, Paperkitty, arachnidsGrip Yes: Kiku-Ichimonji, No: Darros, Snikitty, zorbees, Kay, Kirsche, Radiant Kitty, ClipseyKitty, SlayerX, Paperkitty, arachnidsGrip, Result: Yes - 1, No - 10 Proposal Fails. Darros is the new leader Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Proto, what the hell? You're not on it, and several people don't trust Kevin, so you vote yes? I voted no for two reasons: 1. This is the first proposal, so we've got a couple more before I start getting nervous. 2. It's by Psych, who hasn't been doing much of anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paperblade Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Proto has a habit of upvoting missions for no reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darros Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 The way I'm looking at it right now, I have two people I want to put on this mission because I trust them, and they'd be Eclipse and Tables Paper. I don't trust Slayer or Proto too much. I also don't want to make the team too similar to 2.5's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zorbees Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 voting no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darros Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 To what? I haven't proposed yet. ._. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant Dragon Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 (edited) Where does your trust in eclipse come from, Darros? Also, apologies for not sending in a vote. I don't know how I forgot. Edited September 12, 2011 by Radiant Kitty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriemhild Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Proto, what the hell? You're not on it, and several people don't trust Kevin, so you vote yes? I voted no for two reasons: 1. This is the first proposal, so we've got a couple more before I start getting nervous. 2. It's by Psych, who hasn't been doing much of anything. The only difference between this one and the previous proposal was zorbees being replaced by Kevin. I really don't understand why people don't trust Kevin so I voted Yes. As zak said before proposal 1.1, players should vote what they think of the team while five people vote No to make sure it doesn't go through unless EVERYBODY else votes Yes. My Yes vote was to show that I approve of the team being sent, not because I actually want it to go through. I really think 2.5 had only one Spy in it and not more than that, while the remaining six people contain three Spies, so I want 2-3 of the people from Mission 5 to get in. Also, this is the second proposal, not first. And I think if everybody just defaults their vote to No in the first three proposals, then we'd end up learning nothing from the failed proposals, making zak's plan useless. You guys should vote for what you generally think of the team and stop thinking about whether it's the best team at this point or not. That's what the fourth and fifth proposals are for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.