PuffPuff Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 (edited) Dat Rules (borrowed/stolen from Integrity) - Ratings are assumed to be on Normal. - Votes need some explanation regarding their gameplay performance to be counted. If somebody has already given good reason for a score +/- half a point from yours, you can decide not to explain your score, but I always encourage personal reasoning. Incredibly low scores or high scores without proper justification will not be counted. Don't put in some random text thinking it'd count as justification. Put in at least a little thought and give REAL reasoning. +/- ≤1 point extra regarding personality/appearance is encouraged, but no more. If you exercise your bias privileges, please do so explicitly. Also, if your vote is already a 10/10 or greater than 9 and you give a full point of bias, The score may not exceed 10! - Numerical votes out of 10, or something proportional to it. Make it easy to calculate for my sake. - Every ranking phase ends from 2100 to 2200 EST. Every ranking phase starts from 2200 EST to 2300 EST. Do the math if you are in another timezone! - I will insist you do not use the "Not X" reason on any character, where X is another unit. If you do, your vote will be thrown out. - "Recruits X" or "takes you to X chapter" arguments are explicitly banned. C'mon, people, this shouldn't need to be a rule. That's not gameplay performance. - Assume that the character in question is being recruited. - Similar to the "Recruits X" rule, do not use "He Comes with a Free Weapon" as an argument. - I withhold the privilege to tell you your rating is bogus and demand you revise it if it breaks any of the above. I will not throw out votes anonymously, you will be informed and given a chance to revise. Averages: Clerbe/Cleive: 3.91 Robin: 4.45 Boowy/Boey 4.64 Cellica/Celica: 6.06 May: 6.15 Fols/Force: 6.78 Grey: 6.85 Valbo: 7.10 Kamui:7.5 Clea/Claire: 7.58 Jenny 7.61 Ruka/Luka: 7.89 Cliff: 8.31 Silk: 8.47 Paison/Python: 8.60 Sevr/Saber: 9.26 Alm: 9.59 Since Kamui has already been up for a week, time to begin this one. Edited July 18, 2012 by アイネ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byte2222 Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 So, Leo (at long last). He's basically Python but not quite as good, he lacks Python's strength and has even less speed but he does have a bit more skill and quite a bit more defence and durability, his defence growth is very high. However, the same thing that has given otherwise-fairly-mediocre Python an average rating of 8.6 also redeems Leo; bows are just that good. Overall, Leo is not quite as good as Python but bows still make him a valuable unit. 8.0/10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quirino Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Oh look, it's worse Python. He's pretty durable, but because of that range, he's not supposed to be a tank anyways, and the stats that do matter for him (strength+speed) are bad. He also doesn't get access to the holy bow, but he is the only candidate for the silver bow, which is not quite as great, but still pretty good. But his 1-5 range and high movement when he's a bow knights makes him pretty broken, still. 7/10: Mediocre stats, great class. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.