Faerie Knight

##Vote: Junko I'm fine with this

also you don't know what your action might do at all? no pool of results it draws from? do you have limited shots?

also you don't know what your action might do at all? no pool of results it draws from? do you have limited shots?

why the hell not I check a player and get a color that corresponds to an alignment, but I don't know which unless a player I checked flips the meaning of the colors resets after every two checks, so if I had succeeded tonight, even if Junko would flip as town or whoever I checked (which would have been you) flipped as either town or scum, anyone else coming up with the same color doesn't mean they share that alignment. basically I need one flip from every pair for meaningful results but the motivator's dead, too bad, huh? so much for buying town a day where they didn't fuck up, at least I'm Sharena, don't think I can quote the flavor

good for you, please kill me next was blocked ofc, but Junko came up as green when I checked them n1 now hurry up and let me leave this mess

You know what? My motivation could not be lower. I wouldn't do this otherwise, and yes, I saw all the claiming, but to hell with this, might as well do it now before the likely hammer, I'm a Color Cop. I need at least another night to produce even some useful results, so if you're town, you probably want to give that a chance to happen. Only really interested in actually getting at least something out of my role for town, don't particularly care if anyone wants to kill me after and let me be done with this. I checked Junko so far if anyone cares before my results can mean anything. Let's see if I actually can have even a little fun helping this town win. Inb4 I'm RBed tho, but hey, at least I tried instead of just letting you kill me. mafia sucks

Is this addressed to me? I've cleared Mack because of EoD1, and townread Bartozio because he's given good reasoning and explanations for his actions and responded well to questioning. And do you have a problem with my having felt even more "non-commital" than he did there before the flip? I outright said I'd vote Micheaar simply because I'd pick him over Pika near EoD.

I have questions on someone's reads that make me doubt them, so I say that at that time, I wouldn't mind lynching them if those questions weren't answered satisfyingly, because I wouldn't mind lynching someone I have some suspicion on. But I didn't vote then because the wagon had already built fast and I didn't want to risk a hammer cutting off his chance to answer. Ofc I wasn't just saying I was fine with his lynch so early in the phase. That's all.

I kinda like the new look besides the Discord box being on every page of the forums now -w- Anyway, what I was about to post over an hour ago: I have no idea. Mack's EoD doesn't make sense for scum, so I'm dropping that, you've answered my questions and I don't see any merit in the townslip issue, and I think all of the problems with Elie are the result of his lack of time. Right now, Marth is confirmed, BBM and Mack look town from last EoD, I think you and Bartozio are town, and I'm going to be working from there. Because I had questions on him? Er, no, I wasn't, I openly said I wasn't voting because he had 4 votes and I wanted to give him more time to reply? Also, as a side point I noticed while rereading:

Not really, he's answered the questions I had pretty satisfyingly. I disagree with the Elie vote, however, simply because the case against him can pretty much be answered by his being just that busy. Related, I don't think he'd be this quiet regardless of alignment unless he absolutely couldn't be around. And explain why I'm that different today? (Especially since I just see people actually agreeing with a lot of what I said once they actually get it, whether they saw I said it or not)

did you just legitimately imply the rand would be rigged

Fair. About my vote? I'm saying that it seems you're saying my vote makes sense in the context of my play, what about the reasoning? It's just a strange thing to say about it tbh, doesn't the reasoning/basis of a vote matter more than if it fits in the context of someone's play, whatever exactly that means? True. But why? He gave his town read before Pika came back and there still were people scumreading him, why would it have looked bad for Mack to vote along with them then? Even then, his town read on Pika was even shallower, I don't see why scum wouldn't have gone along with that wagon and tried to get it ahead of the one on what was almost certainly their strongest role.

Nah. What if i'm scum that tried to stick to a weak townie/bussable teammate and avoided consolidating to not have to lynch the Godfather/Role Thief or look bad, if/when they flipped? While taking the time to just say they'd vote Michelaar ahead if necessary? I genuinely felt Mack was worse, of course, and ended up busy and was still typing a post at phase end, but I don't like this read. My vote makes sense with my play, not on its own merits? My refusal to consolidate just doesn't help to read me, it can't be seen as my being stubborn/confident town or scum trying to avoid the wagons? This is wrong too, he took (weak) stances on both players and had both as town when he could easily have joined the wagon on Pika. And why is it fencesitting with him but a NAI refusal to consolidate with me? Refa's 4/6 of the way to Maj as I finish typing this, so I'll hold back, but I wouldn't mind that lynch today pending how he responds. Actually unsure about voting Mack now.

@Pika_pika42 If that wagon doesn't build, and I honestly doubt it will, would you vote Michelaar over yourself?

It's that nothing after was any less suspicious, but yes. And his recent one/two-line opinions list is not worth much either. I've talked about the joke vote thought, but okay.