Colonel M Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 Slapping a Con growth would do though. Other than maybe Wendy, no one really has "shitty" Con in Tier 2. Maybe OJ and the possible Echinda, but there aren't too many of them that are a thumbsore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkhead Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 Uhh... since you can't read or comprehend words, my meaning was that units shouldn't change con in class change. Ah, I see what you mean, if certain character swaps to a mage/sage they would have little trouble picking up tomes like Forblaze or Aureola. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dat Nick Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 (edited) Easily solved by the strength/magic split done in FEDS. Whoosh. There goes 95% of your viable reclassable mages. Forblaze/Aureoula aren't that heavy, to begin with. Edited July 14, 2009 by Norton Sez What? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dondon151 Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 and I don't understand how changing a class should change anything but def/res/spd (due to amount of armor) Not just armor, basically anything that's not innate to a person. I don't think str or con should change upon reclass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.