Junkhead Posted April 25, 2010 Share Posted April 25, 2010 Unfortunately, it IS pretty innacurate...where did Silith exactly get this? Because I highly doubt a woman would even be 14 Con? That's saying as big as Dorcas, Oswin and even bigger than Boyd, Ike and Zelgius, and Zelgius and Oswin have an armor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mousefire Posted April 25, 2010 Share Posted April 25, 2010 So apparently I have the same constitution as Eliwood Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor Odinson Posted April 25, 2010 Share Posted April 25, 2010 (edited) I think it should be based on your body fat-to-mass ratio rather than pure weight itself. Since muscle do weigh more than fat and a person, while overweight on numbers, could actually have very little body fat and is completely jacked for all I care. But then the math could get complicated. (And going by this I'd have 6 con. I could have fun having crit fests while being a Myrm, yay!) Edited April 25, 2010 by Luminescent Blade Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 (edited) Unfortunately, it IS pretty innacurate...where did Silith exactly get this? Because I highly doubt a woman would even be 14 Con? That's saying as big as Dorcas, Oswin and even bigger than Boyd, Ike and Zelgius, and Zelgius and Oswin have an armor. Why wouldn't a woman have 14 con? I've seen a girl taller than I am, and right here in our own forum, we have Harudoku/Utsuho Reiuji who is 197cm (that's 6'6''), much taller than most guys. It's not very common, but it's not impossible, either. Edited April 26, 2010 by Robin Mask Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkhead Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Why wouldn't a woman have 14 con? I've seen a girl taller than I am, and right here in our own forum, we have Harudoku/Utsuho Reiuji who is 197cm (that's 6'6''), much taller than most guys. It's not very common, but it's not impossible, either. Yes, I know this. But even being tall wouldn't be enough to make you have a high Con, Harudoku must indeed be around 14 Con thanks to her height, but she said she isn't overweight or even fat. And by this criteria, the taller and thiner you are, the higher Con you get. Then what can I say about Warriors? They must be pretty heavy thanks to all those muscles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 (edited) Being tall isn't enough to have a really high con, but being tall and having a large build is, even if you don't have very large/well-built muscles. And according to Haru, she has somewhat of a large build, so... Edited April 26, 2010 by Robin Mask Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkhead Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 She said she was well-built and not exactly large built. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 I asked her right when I made that post and she said she has somewhat of a large build. You see, unlike a lot of people, I double check my evidence. My argument is infallible. You lost before I even posted in this topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#!/dev/haru Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 (edited) I have a somewhat bulky build. I'm 6'6", give me a table. >_> Edited April 26, 2010 by Utsuho Reiuji Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parrhesia Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Fifteen, clumsy and shy 15, 5'4, 130 lbs. I'm Con 3. Pretty sure I could carry a sword better than Nino. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstraLunaSol Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 2 Con. Oh wow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liz Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 (edited) That's a fair point. But at the same time, for someone who's 5'11 like me, 180 pounds is considered to be 'healthy' even by the biased BMI standard. And you still don't do anything to address the fact that 200 pounds on a male 5'11" frame may be incredibly overweight for one person (high fat%) and muscular on another. As in, given my really thick frame, I literally cannot weigh less than 175 or so healthily before I start starving myself because I have a lot of muscle and bone mass. But by this scale, I would basically be overweight. (I am of course, but that's because I've put on some weight over the past 3 years since I weighed 180...) apparently, you have the same constitution as a 20 year old 5'8'' female who weighs 110 pounds. that, no matter how you put it, doesn't sound right i highly doubt that i can even do half the things you can do when it comes to strength. when it comes to constitution, you can't only apply weight, since constitution is a sort of overall fitness thing. i've seen more than a few guys who are incredibly fit and low percent fat that always seem to appear overweight on scales such as the BMI because it doesn't account for activity level and muscle mass. this scale has the same problem Edited April 26, 2010 by Champion Cynthia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killer Poleax Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 so I have 8 Con, which is equal to Eddie, Leo and Sothe it could be right, I'm 5'7" about 152-3 lbs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whase Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 okay, now I'm starting to doubt I calculated this right~ I'm 17, meaning -1 I'm 1,92 m and 62.5 kg calculated that to 6.29 feet and 137.8 pound that's +13 ending up in 12 but I'm just a tall skinny guy and I think I could barely even lift a steel sword, iron lance or bronze axe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silith Posted April 26, 2010 Author Share Posted April 26, 2010 WannabeVikafanboy ninja you calculated wrong. First of all yo checked the female tables. The Male tables go up to 6,4. Counting onwards to 6,5 with 238 weight means your con is a whopping 14. The same as me. With that you're the third to be tied for highest Con right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkhead Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Where did you get these again...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Age: 17 Height: 6'2 Weight: 176 pounds Looks like my CON according to this system is 14. ...but I can't lift heavy stuff for crap. I'd give myself like 9 Con at most. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Specta Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 (edited) 16 year old female, 5' 5'' and 117 lbs. That'd make me a 6, eh? Edited April 26, 2010 by Spectakitty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Further proof that either CON means nothing, or this table is silly. Kitty is thus as constitute as Wil, a strapping young man in his prime. wut? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fayt Zelpher Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 16 year old female, 5' 5'' and 117 lbs. That'd make me a 6, eh? Apparently, you have the same constitution as I, who's quite literally twice your size... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkhead Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Like I said earlier, in the previous FEs before FE9 characters also used to have a lower Con. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEST TRYNDAMERE PLAYER Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 12 Con. 19 years old, 6'2, and 210 lbs. Guess I'd have proper con for a Cav Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balcerzak Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Con is either 5 or 6. I'm 5'6", and can't remember what I weigh at the moment, but it traditionally is the area around 120-135. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEnd Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 5'11, 163 pounds, no age mod. 12 con for me. Best basement-dwelling unit ever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NinjaMonkey Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 (edited) WannabeVikafanboy ninja you calculated wrong. First of all yo checked the female tables. The Male tables go up to 6,4. Counting onwards to 6,5 with 238 weight means your con is a whopping 14. The same as me. With that you're the third to be tied for highest Con right now. Er...thanks for that DeludedVikaFangirl! (14 Con eh? Oh well, could be worse I suppose...) Edited April 26, 2010 by NinjaMonkey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.