Darros Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 ....hey guys. I kind of forgot this existed, and now I'm going a guilt trip, don't mind me. <_< >_> I'm kind of getting slight spy vibes from Slayer, since he proposed the failed mission and put himself on it, but it might also be because he knows he's a resistance operative too.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paperblade Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 ... Oh wait, Slayer was the leader there. Okay, never mind what I said above about Kevin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zkirsche Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 I still don't trust anyone who voted yes on Team 1.4 when they weren't on said team, especially Kevin Well, we can't all be spies, and I was semi-comfortable with that team. Although admittedly, I didn't realise that the choice order went in the order of the list of players. If I did, I would've said no just so I could test my team out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanarkin Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 I'm kind of getting slight spy vibes from Slayer, since he proposed the failed mission and put himself on it, but it might also be because he knows he's a resistance operative too.. I wasn't going to go in it, but some people suggested for me to go so yeah. Its not like i forced my way in it (eventhough i was the leader so technically i didn't have to force it). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darros Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 I wasn't going to go in it, but some people suggested for me to go so yeah. Its not like i forced my way in it (eventhough i was the leader so technically i didn't have to force it). I suppose. I mean no leader is gonna say "I don't trust myself so I'm not going on the mission.". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanarkin Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 I suppose. I mean no leader is gonna say "I don't trust myself so I'm not going on the mission.". Its not so much i didn't trust my self, but i wanted most people to be in agreeance with the mission, since it was forced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tables Posted September 8, 2011 Author Share Posted September 8, 2011 Bump. Very few votes on this mission so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tables Posted September 9, 2011 Author Share Posted September 9, 2011 (edited) Mission Proposal 3.1 by Paperkitty Team: zorbees, Pariah, Radiant Kitty, Paperkitty, arachnidsGrip Yes: Radiant Kitty, Kiku-Ichimonji, zorbees No: Darros, Snikitty, Pariah, Kirsche, Clipseykitty, SlayerX, Paperkitty, arachnidsGrip Result: Yes - 2, No - 9 Proposal Fails. arachnidsGrip is the new leader Just for reference, yes, the leader does wrap back around to Darros after this. Edited September 9, 2011 by Tableskitty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zorbees Posted September 9, 2011 Share Posted September 9, 2011 tables i sent a yes vote <.< Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tables Posted September 9, 2011 Author Share Posted September 9, 2011 (edited) Actually, having checked my messages, I simply forgot to update the spreadsheet. Oops. Edited September 9, 2011 by Tableskitty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psych Posted September 9, 2011 Share Posted September 9, 2011 I'm thinking me, Pariah, Darros. Maybe Paper. I can't think of a 5th though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant Dragon Posted September 9, 2011 Share Posted September 9, 2011 Am I the only one that doesn't trust Pariah? What has she done here after subbing in for Balcerzak, anyway? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psych Posted September 9, 2011 Share Posted September 9, 2011 Am I the only one that doesn't trust Pariah? What has she done here after subbing in for Balcerzak, anyway? Yes, but if Bal was "clear" then that means Pariah is "clear". The two are mutually exclusive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant Dragon Posted September 9, 2011 Share Posted September 9, 2011 Since when was Balcerzak clear? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanarkin Posted September 9, 2011 Share Posted September 9, 2011 I don't think Bal was cleared. More like he was trusted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kay Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 Am I the only one that doesn't trust Pariah? What has she done here after subbing in for Balcerzak, anyway? I'm sorry, guys, I just haven't really been paying enough attention to this game. It should help that I've died in all the others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriemhild Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 I trust zak almost solely because of mission 1.4. As zorbees pointed out earlier, sabotaging Mission 1 is actually a very good move for the Spies, unlike in the previous Resistance. One guy will be suspected among a group of four people while the other three remain hidden among a group of seven people. zak would definitely have sabotaged the mission if he were chosen. But he didn't, and unlike zorbees, he didn't try to claim that the people being sent on Mission 1 (except Reinfleche who was inactive) were cleared because of this. So, yeah, I really think zak is Resistance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paperblade Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 ... Except we know that there was at least one spy on 1.4 because the spies upvoted it and before you go "omg paper what if you're spy and lying and they're all resistance," keep in mind that there were 4 downvotes, and one of those was Rein, who was on the mission. So, uh, if we were all spies, we would have upvoted the shit out of that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriemhild Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 It was 1.4. I voted Yes because I didn't want a forced 1.5 and the team seemed fine to me. I'm sure there were others that felt the same way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zorbees Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 (edited) paper, 4 people downvoted it. Some of those 4 people could have been spies. EDIT: I'm not following your 1.4 logic either. The spies didn't know whether or not the mission would pass and if their votes would matter. You can't say "The spies would upvote the mission because it would pass anyways and they want to blend in" because the spies wouldn't know if it would pass if they downvoted. EDIT2: I also am suspicious of Proto for the complete turnaround in your logic and ideals, as if i recall correctly, you were the one arguing with me about mission 1.4. I don't know you too well so I don't know if something like this is normal for you, but I do find it suspicious. Edited September 10, 2011 by zorbees Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriemhild Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 paper, 4 people downvoted it. Some of those 4 people could have been spies. EDIT: I'm not following your 1.4 logic either. The spies didn't know whether or not the mission would pass and if their votes would matter. You can't say "The spies would upvote the mission because it would pass anyways and they want to blend in" because the spies wouldn't know if it would pass if they downvoted. EDIT2: I also am suspicious of Proto for the complete turnaround in your logic and ideals, as if i recall correctly, you were the one arguing with me about mission 1.4. I don't know you too well so I don't know if something like this is normal for you, but I do find it suspicious. Yes, I was arguing about that. But in case you forgot, I wanted to see just how far you would keep arguing to claim that the people being sent on 1.4 must have been Resistance (cept Reinfleche) because Spies would have sabotaged it. Since you were sent on the mission yourself, I suspected that as a Spy, you might have cooperated just to clear yourself. I completely agreed with your logic that Spies SHOULD have sabotaged Mission 1.4 if they had the opportunity to do so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paperblade Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 I know that, zorbees, I'm just saying it's illogical to trust Bal based on 1.4 passing, unless Proto is suggesting that Rein is the spy and idled (which is certainly possible) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 ITT: People talk badly about me when I didn't do it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant Dragon Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 Psych, what's your reasoning for including Darros in this mission? I know it's not the same as mine was (I wanted him to actually say something). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psych Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 Honestly, when I put I was thinking about including him, I had a piece of logic I really liked, and now, a few days later, I can't for the life of me remember what it was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.