Kriemhild Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 Also Zorbees, going to mission proposal x.5 is bad. Really bad. You should not be making plans for it. It's not a bad idea. Zorbees is making the proposal and I trust that he'll send the right people. Somewhat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darros Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 I think most candidates should be discussed before giving plans from X.3 onwards... This is to avoid having to go to a forced mission five. I was poked in a PM. I didn't have tine to discuss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanarkin Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 It's not a bad idea. Zorbees is making the proposal and I trust that he'll send the right people. Somewhat. Its a bad idea because we are being forced in the 5 proposal. There is no 100% fail-safe team that we can send. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paperblade Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 How is that different from an x.4 mission in that there is no fail-safe team we can send Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darros Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 Well, the x.5 mission is forced. What if zorbees is a spy and deliberately puts people on it who will sabotage it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant Dragon Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 Proposal 5 is only a problem if the leader that mission happens to be a Spy. Otherwise, it's little different from any of the others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zorbees Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 If going to x.5 was so bad, everyone would just vote yes on x.4, essentially making x.4 the new x.5. Proposal x.5 is never a problem in and of itself. I am assuming that the spies aren't all bunched together in the leader order (because seriously, if a situation came where the spies had control over 4/5 of the proposals, that would probably not be fair to the resistance), so we should have at least 3 resistance members per 5 proposals. If you fear that a spy has control over the x.5 proposal, you obviously shouldn't let it get that far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 I'm voting no, because I don't like rushed teams (even if I'm on it). Two requests: 1. Can the rest of you don't put me on a mission, unless you are absolutely, positively sure that the others are Resistance? Any spy who winds up on a mission with me will be more than happy to sabotage, and blame me. 2. I want at least two members from the failed proposal on the next mission. We had at least one spy, and I'd like to use this mission to weed him out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kay Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 Voting no, since I don't trust Slayer, I'm not sure what to think of Snike or Psych, and Darros not including himself on his own mission seems a bit odd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriemhild Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 Proposal 5 is only a problem if the leader that mission happens to be a Spy. Otherwise, it's little different from any of the others. Even if the leader is a Spy, we have the right to question him on his choices so he can't just fit a Spy in on purpose without any logical reasoning. Unless it's the final mission. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tables Posted September 14, 2011 Author Share Posted September 14, 2011 ...I am assuming that the spies aren't all bunched together in the leader order (because seriously, if a situation came where the spies had control over 4/5 of the proposals, that would probably not be fair to the resistance)... The spies are entirely random. On the one hand, being bunched together might mean a mission can be forced to fail. On the other hand, it means they only strongly influence perhaps 2 missions in the game, instead of potentially making assignments-to-fail at sporadic times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriemhild Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 I Eat Tables, when are you going to replace 3.2's zorbees with Kirsche in the second post? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tables Posted September 14, 2011 Author Share Posted September 14, 2011 I don't know what you're talking about Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tables Posted September 14, 2011 Author Share Posted September 14, 2011 Good going guys, it's been less than 14 hours and I have all but one vote in already. I'll wait out the last vote as it hasn't been time yet and it might be close, but either way, good to see activity rising again. Until I disappear back to uni in a few weeks . Things should be quiet enough at first to keep running the game though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanarkin Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 voted no. I don't trust darros, his participation in the game has been really low. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tables Posted September 14, 2011 Author Share Posted September 14, 2011 That's everyone, folks! Mission Proposal 3.3 by Darros Team: zorbees, Pariah, Radiant Kitty, Paperkitty, arachnidsGrip Yes: Lol No: Darros, Snikitty, zorbees, Kay, Kirsche, Radiant Kitty, ClipseyKitty, Kiku-Ichimonji, SlayerX, Paperkitty, arachnidsGrip, Result: Yes - 0, No - 11 Proposal Fails. Snikitty is the new leader Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriemhild Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 That's everyone, folks! Mission Proposal 3.3 by Darros Team: zorbees, Pariah, Radiant Kitty, Paperkitty, arachnidsGrip ... I have just been reminded that I should propose. Tables, will you marry me? ##Give the Plans to: Eclipse, SlayerX, Paperblade, Snike, and Psych Screw using the current display names :P I'm starting to wonder if you're doing this on purpose... ...probably trying to send a subtle message to the Resistance members to go with 3.1's team Also, I should remind you guys that if we can send a Spy-less team for Mission 3, we auto-win the game. And if we fail, we'd be forced to go through Mission 5 (if we succeed 4), and selecting six Resistance members isn't going to be easy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tables Posted September 14, 2011 Author Share Posted September 14, 2011 (edited) XD I can tell you exactly why it's happening. I've just automated part of the spreadsheet to update the yes/no columns and vote counts automatically, but not the who's on the mission box (by automatically I mean I put X's by the person on the mission and Yes/No once they vote). I'ma going to update that now too. So is this better? Mission Proposal 3.3 by Darros Team: Snikitty, ClipseyKitty, SlayerX, Paperkitty, arachnidsGrip, Yes: No: Darros, Snikitty, zorbees, Kay, Kirsche, Radiant Kitty, ClipseyKitty, Kiku-Ichimonji, SlayerX, Paperkitty, arachnidsGrip, Result: Yes - 0, No - 11 Proposal Fails. Snikitty is the new leader Edited September 14, 2011 by Tableskitty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snike Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 ##Give plans to: Snikitty, zorbees, Psych, Radiant Kitty, Kay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 Uhh. . .Psych? Again? Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanarkin Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 ##Give plans to: Snikitty, zorbees, Psych, Radiant Kitty, Kay I'd like to know why... You know promote discussion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psych Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 Uhh. . .Psych? Again? Why? Why is Snike a safer bet then I am? It's just as possible he's a spy and then knows it's an easy sabotage and can easily pass off the blame to me or Paper. Wasn't that what you said would happen with you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snike Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 I see Darros, Proto, Slayer, and Lightning, who is now you, as possible spies, and, with Kevin and Papermole being on the sabotaged mission earlier, I went with Psych over them, since we already have 40% of the failed mission on board. The other two I believe to be resistance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 Congratulations, that's the first explanation that makes sense. For that bout of logic, I'll vote yes on this mission. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snike Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 Previous post was directed at eclipse. @Me going on the mission: There was a pool of five I had to pick from, and I decided to put my name along with Radiant's on the mission. FMPOV, it's 20% less of a risk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.