PuffPuff Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 (edited) Dat Rules (borrowed/stolen from Integrity) - Ratings are assumed to be on Normal. - Votes need some explanation regarding their gameplay performance to be counted. If somebody has already given good reason for a score +/- half a point from yours, you can decide not to explain your score, but I always encourage personal reasoning. Incredibly low scores or high scores without proper justification will not be counted. Don't put in some random text thinking it'd count as justification. Put in at least a little thought and give REAL reasoning. +/- ≤1 point extra regarding personality/appearance is encouraged, but no more. If you exercise your bias privileges, please do so explicitly. Also, if your vote is already a 10/10 or greater than 9 and you give a full point of bias, The score may not exceed 10! - Numerical votes out of 10, or something proportional to it. Make it easy to calculate for my sake. - Every ranking phase ends from 2100 to 2200 EST. Every ranking phase starts from 2200 EST to 2300 EST. Do the math if you are in another timezone! - I will insist you do not use the "Not X" reason on any character, where X is another unit. If you do, your vote will be thrown out. - "Recruits X" or "takes you to X chapter" arguments are explicitly banned. C'mon, people, this shouldn't need to be a rule. That's not gameplay performance. - Assume that the character in question is being recruited. - Similar to the "Recruits X" rule, do not use "He Comes with a Free Weapon" as an argument. - I withhold the privilege to tell you your rating is bogus and demand you revise it if it breaks any of the above. I will not throw out votes anonymously, you will be informed and given a chance to revise. Alm: 9.59 Ruka: 7.89 -Good Str -Good HP -Good Def -Bad Speed, Luck, and Skill Because of his bad Speed, it is advised to make him a Merc, Sword/Demon fighter. Otherwise, he's mediocre. 6.5/10 Edited June 15, 2012 by アイネ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppy Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 Dat Rules (borrowed/stolen from Integrity) - Ratings are assumed to be on Normal. - Votes need some explanation regarding their gameplay performance to be counted. If somebody has already given good reason for a score +/- half a point from yours, you can decide not to explain your score, but I always encourage personal reasoning. Incredibly low scores or high scores without proper justification will not be counted. Don't put in some random text thinking it'd count as justification. Put in at least a little thought and give REAL reasoning. +/- ≤1 point extra regarding personality/appearance is encouraged, but no more. If you exercise your bias privileges, please do so explicitly. Also, if your vote is already a 10/10 or greater than 9 and you give a full point of bias, The score may not exceed 10! - Numerical votes out of 10, or something proportional to it. Make it easy to calculate for my sake. - Every ranking phase ends from 2100 to 2200 EST. Every ranking phase starts from 2200 EST to 2300 EST. Do the math if you are in another timezone! - I will insist you do not use the "Not X" reason on any character, where X is another unit. If you do, your vote will be thrown out. - "Recruits X" or "takes you to X chapter" arguments are explicitly banned. C'mon, people, this shouldn't need to be a rule. That's not gameplay performance. - Assume that the character in question is being recruited. - Similar to the "Recruits X" rule, do not use "He Comes with a Free Weapon" as an argument. - Rate the character based on his/her performance without the Rainbow Potion, Maturity Drop or Bond Drop - I withhold the privilege to tell you your rating is bogus and demand you revise it if it breaks any of the above. I will not throw out votes anonymously, you will be informed and given a chance to revise. May wanna remove the bolded rule since those don't exist in FE2! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Purple_Knight Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 7/10 decent demon fighter , but crappy at everything else because of his mediocre speed . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PuffPuff Posted June 15, 2012 Author Share Posted June 15, 2012 May wanna remove the bolded rule since those don't exist in FE2! Thanks. =) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikado Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 BAMF. His best class is Mercenary, but he probably can be awesome in any class. Sure he's slow, but he makes it up with is durability. Best villager out of the three and probably the best non-Alm unit in Alm's party. 10/10 Plus, GreyxClea FTW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Hardin Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 (edited) He has some speed issues but ultimately should turn out fine. 8/10 Also does the infinite promotion loop count in ratings? Edited June 15, 2012 by Emperor Hardin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agile Tit-Tyrant Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 Not awful like Robin. But Cliff is still better. But he has good strength and can hold his own defensively 6.5/10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quirino Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 (edited) Bad bases and growths except for strength + HP. His promotion options are limited if you want him to stay useful. At least he doesn't have to gain levels before his first promotion. Better than Robin, worse than Cliff. Best promotion option is arguably mercenary, the good strength + HP growth combined with the class speed of mercenary makes him a reasonably durable hard hitter. Statistically, he'd also make a decent soldier/armor, but Luka's already there. I made him a cavalier my latest playthrough but I dropped him in chapter 3 because of his nonexistent speed, with a weapon equipped he even GOT doubled and he's not THAT durable either :/ So I don't suggest that. 5.5/10 edit: should repeated battles (like the shrines) be included in the rating? I never do those, so I may rate some characters a bit different than those who do repeated battles. Edited June 15, 2012 by Quirino Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mekkah Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 He's okay, but it takes a little too long to get him going and he can't always be what he wants. 6/10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byte2222 Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 Not bad. Better than Robin, not as good as Cliff, decent bases, instant promotion, suspect resistance. 6/10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riariadne Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 Overall pretty solid but nothing special at all. 6.5/10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arvilino Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 Worth using, the Mercenary Classes speed base stat take care of his low speed growth and his high strength growth make him rather useful. He could also be a Paladin/Gold Knight if you don't mind his speed being a bit on the lower side. 6.5/10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PuffPuff Posted June 20, 2012 Author Share Posted June 20, 2012 Tallied. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.