Goonachu Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 Instead of choosing west or east & playing them the whole game:(which would be awesome btw.) What if they pulled what they did in Radiant Dawn where some chapters you control the West army, and some you can control the East? Occasionally fighting each other. If so, what would be good ideas for that system of a story? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostyFireMage Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 Or like in Gaiden where you controlled both Alm's army and Celica's army? I would like that honestly, it would make for a nice change of pace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 Maybe the reason we've seen two versions of the lord is that we have some sort of split/twins to the throne stuff. Customize two avatars each heroes for the two sides! (Very very unlikely but it would be kinda neato with this choice thing) But yeah anything like Gaiden is good in my book. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Replica Model Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 (edited) That would be interesting. IS has done that in Advance Wars Dual Strike (in campaign mode)with two separate player phases but that's meant for multiplayer on the same cartridge but who does that anyway? It's like the Orange Star and Blue Moon armies vs. Black Hole. Edit: Woops, I read the whole thing wrong. Ignore this. My bad. Edited March 30, 2015 by Replica Model Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magical Glace Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 So FE10 part 3. It was okay but it favored a shitlord too much, so long as every lord gets equal playtime overall, I'm fine. FE10 had the better of its lords fade to the background after a while. I wouldn't mind equality and I'm sure others can agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draco Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 I would prefer this over just choosing one side for the whole game. I'd like if there were some charactors that appear in an East chapter or something, and if you don't recruit them there, they show up later in a West chapter. Or a few characters that are exclusive to one side. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saladus Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 (edited) No. If choices are supposed to be if's (Harhar) big thing, then no, you shouldn't be able to use a large portion (if any) of the non-aligned factions' units regardless of route. And no, don't have another case of ''Let's all be friends against the final boss'' (Radiant Dawn). Go play Der Langrisser to see how to handle warring playable armies. Edited March 30, 2015 by Saladus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NekoKnight Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 I'd rather have a more focused story, using only one side. I don't like rotating teams such as we had in FE10. If this is going to be a Fire Emblem with significant choices to be made, there will be enough variety already, not to mention all the possibilities for interesting maps/objectives. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.