Jump to content

Psych

Member
  • Posts

    3,856
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Psych

  1. If the town consists of Eclipse, Scorri and Prims and any of them are alive after Day 3, then you'll get called out for lurking

    literally any other case and you've suddenly won as scum cause everyone else just lets scum lurk like shit

  2. I just now found this thread

    imo /in as a giant 5-man hydra of the strongest players on the site: Prims, BBM, Paperblade, eclipse, and Psych.

    I don't have a real opinion on who the strongest players are so don't read into the first part of that list seriously.

    yes

    i'm not here to win i'm here to make friends

    prims for best model

    *gasps and shudders*

    well at least Psych will get that playerslot modkilled. :3

    excuse u i will also fake claim sk

    Not before killing at least two people of his alliance by accident/impulse

    prims i luv u

  3. Blitzcrank is a support typically. Top lane is reserved mostl for fighters and tanks or people who can sustain and are durable to survive jungle ganks. Start out with Garen or Cho'gath but someone like Tryndamere is also good even if he isn't that tanky.

  4. ugh fuck you Vhaltz for trying to make this stupid wagon a thing

    Might as well claim now before he gets me mislynched. I'm a neighbour maker; I can choose one user each night to gain OC with the following day. I've a shot each of vig + active bomb in my hand, though with this claim I don't expect to last long enough to use it because scum's probably gonna be all over my ass.

    And no, even if I try to use my role on scum, it'll still work, as Elie confirmed earlier.

    Now can we please lynch Vhaltz already?

    This is really the only post I can make from my phone but I call bullshit, this is the same as my role. I can give OC between me and a target. Let me get back to reading

  5. Opinions about everybody right now. My lynch preference is Psych but I'm 99% sure that a wagon won't be going by the end of the phase. However I feel like I'm in the same position with Kay right now so I'm gonna Unvote. I will probably wind up going with the wagon I most agree with in the next two or three hours.

    ##Unvote

    Would like to lynch:

    Psych: Weak vote with untrue information as its backing. In the same post though he shows some minor understanding of the situation so skimming might be a reason. Would like to hear who else he thinks is scum.

    Where did I say something untrue? Were you lying at the time you made those posts or did you not want the town to claim cards so the mafia might know what they're working against?

  6. Wow.

    You guys are never happy. You are constantly asking me a gazillion questions about every single read, call me scummy whenever I'm not answering some question and when I answer them then I'm padding content because my explanations outweigh my scumhunting content which is NATURAL considering that almost all of the game has something to complain about or to ask wrt me. I'm also scum apparently for being active as a consequence of having so many things to answer. Everything is a scumtell, fucking yay.

    There's no way I can fix anything if people are absolutely consumed by confirmation bias.

    I called Kay out for parking because:

    1) I like D1 wagon-building analysis as a result of wanting to be able to catch scum D1, and coasting through this part of the phase is common for scum. Hell if I know what her post frequency meta is out of one game where I only saw her play D1 with a protection role.

    2) I didn't find anybody else to be more likely to be scum at that point, nor now, and I wanted to push the case further with the little I had. I found most active posters to be some degree of town, and those that I didn't find town I lined up the scummy things they did in my head and found possible townie motivation behind them. Psych and Kay are the only two I've found doing things that are pro-scum and I don't see town doing. See: Poly and Randa.

    I'm amazed that scorri feels the need to point out my lack of a followup on Kay when there have been no posts by Kay since I made it and I actually DID follow it up with the votepark callout, whether it is invalidated by meta or not doesn't change the fact that I DID follow up on it.

    Suddenly coming up with "his votehop on me was bad for several reasons" as one of her only reasons to suspect me is terrible because:

    1) she clearly understood my case back when it happened and admitted to being at fault.

    2) she is actively avoiding giving reasons why it is bad. One should explain why things are scummy and not bad, but scorri is avoiding giving reasons for anything altogether.

    Not to mention that there was no excuse for that last post to not include a vote on me unless she doesn't want to be associated with my flip.

    I want to vote scorri but I realize that this is probably frustration speaking so I'm holding it until I cool my head a little.

    What did I do that's pro scum? I'm not trying to get an easy vote on the bandwagon, i'm not voting you, i'm not doing anything detrimental to the town, and i'm certainly not trying to throw out easy ways to get info yet repealing my stance while still being open for later "incase anyone else wants to share cards"

    Kay is basically a more active Rein which is still nothing so i'm not really surprised by her activity. She usually doesn't respond much until she gets a couple votes

  7. Psych's meta is that he reads the thread by ctrl+fing the word "Psych"

    also he claimed limited access so I'm not really sure what to think, would like an updated post from him.

    It'd be bad to say this is true, but admittedly that's like 30% how I play mafia

    @Poly: I don't have thoughts about any Vhaltz voters I haven't already talked about. As is I find Vhaltz a headache to read because there's simultaneously some Townie Shit and some Scummy Shit and I'm inclined to just see if he gets shot at night or not. Want to keep my eye on BBM and Kay though.

    Biggest prims crumb I ever saw, he's vig guys

    I still say we lynch Kay. Her only contribution to the thread is putting down a policy lynch vote over talking about self-meta and lurking out the rest of the day until maybe deadline. Her only comments on other players are newbie chastising (which makes up over 50% of her only content post) and throwing criticism on scorri which took no effort since I had already worded that same thing myself, hell, she uses the same "noncommittal" term which I don't think has been significantly prevalent in the last few mafia games. It is literally a no effort post.

    I'm also fine with lynching Psych, he demonstrated having read the thread by saying I'm trying to avoid being misunderstood (which is a character trait and I do this all the time regardless of alignment), yet came up with an entirely fake reason to vote Randa. I've seen him lurking around at least twice since his last post and there's nothing else to be seen from him. Feels like he's just trying to take advantage of the wagon on loud me to coast past D1 on minimal content.

    Cuts, putting this out

    Apparently i'm still in thread if i leave it up on my phone in the background. Also I didn't vote you so not really sure how that's me coasting on a bandwagon

    The_Band_Wagon_%281953_film%29_DVD_boxar

    Don't put words in my mouth. Go read post 128. I said that I would still be willing to share the information. At no point have I said otherwise. I said I know why others don't want to, but I am still willing to share that information.

    And just a quick question to poly. What else would you have me post on? I was sleeping for the majority of the discussion about Vhaltz and when I woke up he was in L-2 while I'm suspicious of a mayor in this setup. And apparently I need to go fix my votal chart.

    I know you said you were still up for doing it, but it was basically a reaction test to see town opinions on doing so. You almost immediately withdrew the idea as soon as someone was opposed, yet said you would still do it, as if that would earn you credit if we do it later one. That's pretty much not having a strong opinion and just trying to please people so you don't looking scummy later on if we have to claim cards.

    For the record I am sick right now. I slept for nearly 13 hours. I was working on my post when I was prodded.
    I can't remember if I already stated this but one of the major reasons that I don't like Kay right now is making Green Poet. Seems like hurrying a lynch before we even looked into to anybody else yet. Which seems Anti-Town to me.

    And in my honest opinion my scum ranks go:
    Neko
    Kay
    Vhaltz
    Psych
    Prims

    I prodded Neko about 20 hours ago. Still have seen any content from him. He said he's post today hasn't and its getting on my nerves.
    The issue that I have with Prims is that he hasn't really been doing much since the votes came off of him. And aside from that he is like SB in my mind.
    Vhaltz I'm still waffling on. I see and understand the cases made against him. However they aren't something I would act on right now.
    And Psych irks me because he seems like he's trying make a case where there isn't one. And to get that he is using untrue information.

    This is what we call OMGUS, since i'm pretty sure i'm not pulling these quotes out of my ass

    I haven't commented on the Eury thing so far because I can understand the points given against her but disagree that they necessarily make her scum. Pretty much agree with Shinori here.

    Although wrt Shinori it irks me that the only thing he adds onto the SB case is "waffling" when he clearly states it as such himself and only spends one sentence on each nullread (one of which was the player he was currently voting and it makes sense that he'd explain why he's switching). It certainly doesn't give me the feeling that he's abusing waffles to pad his posts if that's what you were trying to imply, so why does the waffling make him scum?

    Also missed this yesterday

    ##FoS: Psych

    His Randa vote is based entirely on the false claim that he jump-switched his opinion wrt SB's suggestion, painting it as a completely unexplained 180ยบ. There's like no logical explanation for town to do this (unless they're not really playing the game, but his side-comment on me makes me feel like he was reading alright). Is there some Psych meta thing I'm missing?

    There's also been like half the activity rate while I was sleeping than there was the other night, which leads me to think that somebody is likely to be voteparking scum coasting past midD1 and directly into deadline. Kay fits the voteparking profile and there's scum intent to be had by sitting there (reinforcing her case on me would mean exposing herself to criticism at an important D1 juncture before consolidation) so I'm currently feeling pretty good about my Kay case/vote.

    Speaking of deadline, it happens at like 6-7 AM my time and it's impossible for me to be around then, I'll stick around until 1:00-1:30 AM but not much longer than that.

    Kay > Psych >> Poly (would lynch over null/townreads but don't think he's very likely to be scum atm, so uninterested otherwise) > rest > Eury/SB >> kirsche.

    Just for the record, that's my point. There is no logical reason for town to pull their opinion that quickly unless they just wanted to make it seem like they were trying to do something to get quick info and fit in, which scum wants.

  8. So anybody want to speculate on what each deck holds?

    Not at all a worthwhile train of thought.

    Weird counter point to take right after

    It probably isn't worth it, but it did give me another idea.

    Thoughts on everyone claiming what cards they used in the previous night every day? We wouldn't get that info from anyone who got nightkilled and it would force scum to lock in fakeclaims early, so I think it has it's merits. Could be extended to deck chosen too, I guess.

    Pretty obvious they'd be able to play cards and kill

    I'm up with it too, but there's no rule stating that scum can't use cards and kill simultaneously, that I could see at least.

    Another post inc

    Honestly I'd guess that he was asking for why you disagree with saying what cards we used.

    Personally the more I've thought about it, the more I think it's less useful than people think. It's giving away information about what's in your hand and also what deck you drew from, and also I feel like unless your card gives actual useful information, it's not worth giving out that info.

    As for Vhaltz's comments, I agree that I gave a fairly noncommittal read on Prims. And there's a reason for that. It's because I don't think there's enough information in the game yet for me to give a solid read on anyone. Especially not someone that I always have a hard time reading. Basically, I don't trust my read on him enough to warrant a vote, but I was asked to explain my thoughts on him, so I did.

    I'm surprised how quickly Randa flopped on the sharing cards idea and it looks like he was trying to throw that out there and get some town opinions. Seems super scummy to me to flop that quickly. I just don't like these rapid fire point of view changes. ##Vote Randa

    I don't like Vhaltz because it seems like he keeps trying to specifically state what he meant so no one misunderstands him while at the same time blowing things up out of proportion. Basically some pretty scummy ways of coming up with evidence of nothing there and defending himself at the same time.

×
×
  • Create New...