General Spoon

He did that so that everybody would have an even about of votes on them.

Very well, I will enlighten you. We're lynching the whole town. Make sense now?

That isn't everybody but yourself Ulki.

Hah. I've finished a role PM.

Oh wait, nevermind. My apologies. Carry on then.

I fail to see what you're trying to do there Balcerzak. Why would the mafia advocate EVERYBODY dying? It seems you're only trying to kill certain people. Unfortunately, I have already voted for you, so there is little more I can do.

Okay, I'm going to start writing up role PMs now. Then I'll make the train route, and finish setting up the forum. By the time I'm done with that, it should be time to start the game.

Hey everybody, just vote for everyone. Nobody will win, but nobody will lose either.

My votes aren't going to change anytime soon.

Can we just end this in a tie already?

While, I was starting to suspect it after the first three were like that, but I felt that something that major couldn't have been overlooked.

Snike How about this. Since THIS discussion isn't going anyplace, let's try this one. What do you guys think is cheaper. Killing the mafia off in this fashion, or killing the mafia off based on the fact that THEY'RE RIGHT NEXT TO EACHOTHER on Bizz's list?

Wait a minute. I think this idea may work. We just all do this, and everybody dies. Only possible flaw is a mafia blitzing the votes. Ether Bizz BK-201 General Spoon Lightning Balcerzak Ulki Core Ninji Hikarusa The Dragonslayer WoMC

$10 says you only did that after I pointed out your oversight. Pay up.

Dracohon. Lack of townie slots to slip into seems to have been an oversight.

Here is a link to the thread.

Also, you showed me that link earlier. I was bringing it up again. How does the partly dead percentages work? I assume that lynching causes 100% death, and that night kills with no 100% dominant wolf cause partial death in relation to the chance of being the dominant wolf. Are these partial death percentages additive?

What is the reasoning behind not allowing us to claim our player number? I mean, there IS reasoning behind this, and its not just tacked on, right?

If it helps, its kinda like how quantom mechanics can only give you a probability of something.

http://puzzle.cisra.com.au/2008/quantumwerewolf.html Look what I dug up Fayt!

I'm sure the game might sort itself out. Maybe.

General Spoon

Well, 2 is a good idea if we can decide to trust somebody.

In the event that Mike isn't really wall, I'm going to keep my vote on him until after anybody who might be the real wall has had sufficient time to counterclaim.

Wait, I thought that it was standard to fight Sabrina first. I'm going to continue to do it wrong though.