Der Kommissar
-
Posts
388 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Der Kommissar
-
-
The title of this topic really does a good job of highlighting part of the problem.
POOP YOU
-
DAAAH! TOO MANY LEETLE MEN IN THIS CLUB!
MY WORD!!! IT'S A COMMUNIST!!!
HURRY, GET THE FIRE AXE!
GO AHEAD! HIT ME! I DARE YOU!
-
It's probably because the staff has developed a deep-seated hatred for seeing that thread at the top of FftF. We had a similar situation on FESS about some retarded pirate thread. A decent number of members were tired of it being stupid shit and livened it up with spengbabs. Much butthurt was to be had and laughed at.
That was funny for awhile, but then whatever good conversation was going on in the Nightmare Restaurant thread was ruined in the process. Damn you all.
U mad?
-
DAAAH! TOO MANY LEETLE MEN IN THIS CLUB!
-
It's probably because the staff has developed a deep-seated hatred for seeing that thread at the top of FftF. We had a similar situation on FESS about some retarded pirate thread. A decent number of members were tired of it being stupid shit and livened it up with spengbabs. Much butthurt was to be had and laughed at.
-
It honestly looks pretty stupid to me.
As a psychfag, I have a special place in my heart for hating hypnosis and the effects it can produce.
-
Every time I read the topic title I laugh.
You're not alone. I mean, I've seen some pathetic things in my time, but...
-
There are easier ways to deal with the flu than having a weakened version pumped into your body for a literal training exercise.
Uh...no there is not. By definition.
-
CHINA HAS BEEN GENEROUS
-
This place has truly gone to shit.
It was a short fall.
-
Now walk it out now walk it out now walk it out now walk it out
It doesn't affect my attitudes towards vaccines because I'm not a moron. I also don't believe that Jews did 9/11 or that the NWO as ruled by Space Illuminati is coming.
-
Sure is broken image here in this post.
-
-
Lastly, German Man... I checked up on the definition of evidence. It's not what you pass it off as.
1 a : an outward sign : indication b : something that furnishes proof : testimony; specifically : something legally submitted to a tribunal to ascertain the truth of a matter
2 : one who bears witness; especially : one who voluntarily confesses a crime and testifies for the prosecution against his accomplices
^^ It is submitted to a tribunal, or in other words, the thing or person that must compile the evidence... Hm... interesting...
^^^ I guess the second one is more hard core legal stuff. This one fits into my former posts too though... slightly.
Playing semantic children's games with a googled dictionary definition lends no credence to your idiotic claim that evidence is something "personal." I'm sure even you can tell the difference between evidence presented to a judicial tribunal, which is often obviously ambiguous and readily manipulated by lawyers to support their position, from evidence for things such as natural selection or the force of gravity, which involve objective phenomena and mathematics. I'm pretty sure you're being intentionally disingenuous at this point.
I'm not interested in continuing this discussion with you in this thread, because unlike yourself, I'm not going to nitpick with Jyosua's post in an attempt to continue what passes for debate with you ad infinitum. I invite you to create a discussion centered around this elsewhere, if you want, so that I can continue stomp on your balls at my leisure without feeling like I'm directly shitting on a staff ruling.
-
You think evidence has to be objectively verifiable?!
Evidence is, by definition, objectively verifiable.
The universe for starters is pretty damn marvelous wouldn't you agree? Well how did it get here?I just called you out on begging the question in lieu of evidence, and you're going to do it anyway?
There's no REAL EVIDENCE [...]Concession accepted.
But which one do atheists latch onto? Natural creation.The theories which atheists turn to to explain the universe are irrelevant to creationist "theories" lacking any sort of objective evidence whatsoever, which is the whole point of this discussion.
Now once again, EVIDENCE IS PERSONAL PROOF.Using caps lock will not make you correct.
I'm just saying that there's no sense in you shouting for objective proof when on the flip side, you lack the same thing, objective proof.I'm considering putting in a support ticket for the auto-suspension of anyone who fails to understand that the person making the claim presents the evidence. You can't prove a negative, you moron, this has been explained to you probably over a dozen times and yet you persist. It's magnificent, in a laugh-at-the-retard sort of way.
-
It seems Esau has sadly beaten me to the punch yet again, so I'll make my reply brief.
sigh* Like I said, you're doing the same thing. What is evidence? Since you can't answer that question, I will do it for you. Evidence is personal proof,Wrong. Evidence is objectively verifiable phenomena. Personality does not enter at any point.
You're ignoring what could be evidence of a God, just like Christians ignore the evidence that there might not be a God.Provide objective data (you know, evidence) that is directly linked to god or GTFO. You and others have been challenged with this before, only to sidestep or beg the question. It is ridiculous to defend blind faith as at all reasonable, and equally ridiculous to equate logical dismissal of something for which no evidence exists with blind faith.
You're simply coming up with beliefs that are more acceptable in the age we live in.I'm choosing not to put faith in something for which no objective evidence exists, and which is on its face absurd.
What if the jolly fat man was real?What if birds flew out of my ass?
-
dat sip
-
Counter Strike: Source is indeed quite devious.
-
As is typical for you, the barb flew over your head. I'm mocking your constant "LOOK AT ME! I'M A MARTYR PERSECUTED BY THE EEEEEEEVIL ATHEISTS!" behavior.
-
Ironic that you mention this as if you're not doing the same thing.[...] Atheists do the same thing.
Wrong. This has been explained to you before, so I've got to assume you're either borderline retarded, willfully ignorant, butthurt, or a combination thereof. Lack of belief in the absence of evidence is rational thought in motion. It's absurd to assume the existence of a sapient, all-powerful invisible man of whom no evidence has or does exist, but who magically created everything. Based on your line we should take the hallucinations and delusions of schizophrenics seriously.
That's all there is to it.
-
This is no big deal.
Though frankly, Spoon, if you don't think scissors make a decent improvised weapon, then you have a serious deficiency in imagination.
-
Don't forget your crucifix.
-
The replies in this thread are delicious. It's quite easy to tell the morons from the people who believe knowledge is a good thing.
Jyosua raises a good point, though(!). Higher quality standards in education are called for, and we shouldn't be trying to force everyone into a university - trade classes should be brought back/expanded upon. Choice in general, as quanta mentioned, could use augmenting. We also need rid of this frankly idiotic tenant of No Child Left Behind that gives bad schools LESS money. However, class length is a problem when you're trying to communicate new ideas, and lengthier classes leaves more room for thorough explanations, questions, and in-class work over homework.
-
Someone choosing to believe in ghosts because they like them better is no less idiotic than Christians (or Muslims, or Jews, or Hindus, or...) believing in their imaginary friend over Odin or Zeus or Ra or Quetzalcoatl or the God-Emperor of Mankind.
2012
in Entertainment
Posted
Mocking use of images is strictly my purview, Esau. I'm sure you have my credentials.