Raven Posted April 16, 2010 Share Posted April 16, 2010 Indeed. Also what I was saying was that catching them all is now a near impossible task to do in a reasonable timeframe, unless, to put it bluntly, you have no friends/life etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ike-Mike Posted April 16, 2010 Share Posted April 16, 2010 Also, why are you people thinking so deeply about a slogan? The games never put a gun to your head and say "You WILL get all the pokemon". Hell, your reward for doing so is a fucking diploma. The games didn't, but the merchandise and advertising back then certainly did. Although from what I recall last time we had a discussion, I just find what is fun to be radically different than you do, so perhaps it would be difficult to reconcile our views on the matter. Pretty much. I see 'content' in a "Why should I play this game?" rather than "How much stuff did they manage to put in this time?" kind of way and "Because you can do the same as before, but in larger quantities." certainly isn't a good answer for me. Moreover too large quantities make me feel like the devs put in the stuff just to pad things out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defeatist Elitist Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 (edited) Pretty much.I see 'content' in a "Why should I play this game?" rather than "How much stuff did they manage to put in this time?" kind of way and "Because you can do the same as before, but in larger quantities." certainly isn't a good answer for me. Moreover too large quantities make me feel like the devs put in the stuff just to pad things out. Indeed then. I tend to see content as a "Why should I play this game?" thing too, but I find "being able to do the same as before but in larger qualities" decent, and one of my favorite parts about games is sitting there and going "I could never get through all the options this game has given me, huzzah!" Whereas, as far as I can tell, you would like them to keep it simple, albeit it interesting and probably innovative? I dunno? Of course, I also enjoy many games that are more simple. <3 World of Goo. Edited April 17, 2010 by ZXValaRevan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 (edited) Everything you see in the above picture. <3 Also, evolutions for all of the eeveeevolutions would be sweet. :D Edited May 4, 2010 by Bryan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silith Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 I would love to get Dragonair a new evolution choice where it keeps it's long and slender form. And Luvdisk becomening something ownage at like level 55 (in a certain route?) or something would be nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan Posted May 20, 2010 Share Posted May 20, 2010 I would love to get Dragonair a new evolution choice where it keeps it's long and slender form. I want a different Pikachu Evolution. Raichu = Blegh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momo Posted May 20, 2010 Share Posted May 20, 2010 I want a different Pikachu Evolution. Raichu = Blegh. You shut your mouth. Fatty is the best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan Posted May 20, 2010 Share Posted May 20, 2010 You shut your mouth. Fatty is the best. Not unless Pikachu has already learned all of its moves. Raichu only learns four moves (IIRC, At least in Yellow.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strawman Posted May 21, 2010 Share Posted May 21, 2010 An evolution for Qwillfish! Pufferfish/Blowfish are awesome, so it needs to evolve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewjeo Posted May 21, 2010 Share Posted May 21, 2010 An evolution for Dunsparce. It needs SOMETHING to make it worthwhile. It's probably the most pointless pokemon ever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killer Poleax Posted May 22, 2010 Share Posted May 22, 2010 (edited) Parasect Farfetch'd Delibird Qwilfish Seaking Dunsparce Ledian Furret Jynx Tauros Mr. Mime Electrode Dewgong Cloyster Persian Girafarig Hitmonlee/chan/top Venomoth Arcanine Ninetales Rapidash Sudowoodo Octillery Corsola Sunflora Fearow Dodrio Arbok Sandslash Dugtrio most pokemon who don't have a 3rd stage I'd like to see get another evolution, only if they really need it though. Edited May 22, 2010 by Killer Poleax Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salad Utensil Posted May 22, 2010 Share Posted May 22, 2010 An evolution for Dunsparce. It needs SOMETHING to make it worthwhile. It's probably the most pointless pokemon ever. Flitch Hax ftw? Seriously serene's grace is annoying Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewjeo Posted May 22, 2010 Share Posted May 22, 2010 True, I guess that could be annoying. But besides that, it sure seems pretty useless. I think that an evolution for it would do it a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HongLei Posted May 25, 2010 Share Posted May 25, 2010 Seriously pincer has been waiting 8+ years game freak with everynew gen he gets excited because his good buddy scyther got one 8+ years ago and he is sad also I'd like to see a stat boost for everything gen 1-2 because back then gf could have never imagined battling this day and thought charizard would always be a king now butchered by stealth rock Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.